27.07.2013 Views

COAL - Clpdigital.org

COAL - Clpdigital.org

COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

48 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

cause, devise ways and means to terminate same<br />

as soon as possible and prevent a recurrence. The<br />

inspector peers patiently into every hole and<br />

corner accompanied by tne mine foreman, a con­<br />

scientious fellow that feels the condition of his<br />

mine is stamping a never-to-be eradicated blot on<br />

his managerial escutcheon. "Back along the<br />

butts toward the main entries the room ribs were<br />

mined out clean, I know that to be fact," says the<br />

mine foreman, and the condition of the surface<br />

indicates this. As this guarantees the safety of<br />

the main entry all that can be done is to save the<br />

material and attack chain pillars, ribs and stumps,<br />

working them night and day to reduce the resist­<br />

ance sufficiently and so produce another surface<br />

break. This was done, effectually stopping the<br />

trouble. Months after, a circuitous road was<br />

driven ahead of the ruined part, sufficient barrier<br />

was left, precluding the possibility of the creep<br />

extending in that direction. The foreman is still<br />

there. He has been reassured, the inspector has<br />

proven to the satisfaction of all concerned, that,<br />

had the foreman been the smartest mine manager<br />

in existence he could not have prevented the dis­<br />

aster. "His predecessor never had any trouble of<br />

that nature." suggests some one. "No," said the<br />

inspector, "because the system, up to the time of<br />

his departure, was the proper one; at that time<br />

it should have been altered, which the mine fore­<br />

man had not the authority to do. The shaft, as<br />

you remember, is situated in a vaney, the depth<br />

to the coal being only 100 feet: the method of<br />

mining was double entry, rooms 33 feet centers,<br />

24 feet wide, leaving 9-foot ribs. Under the then<br />

existing conditions this was barely sufficient to<br />

steady the strata and allow the ribs to be drawn.<br />

When this man took charge the entries were at<br />

the point of entering under the surrounding hills,<br />

which added from 400 to 600 feet of strata. Of<br />

course, the method of running w-as not changed to<br />

meet the altered surface conditions and before<br />

the entries reached half way of their destination.<br />

many of the rooms were worked out, nothing but<br />

eoal veils left to resist the awful pressure of hills<br />

nearly tall enough to reach the clouds. Natur­<br />

ally, the ribs succumbed. The new style com­<br />

pensates for all changes of surfaces that may<br />

occur. The foreman was not culpable, but the<br />

method or system was. There have been many<br />

similar cases so it behooves us to look first to<br />

the underground manager's environments before<br />

condemning him for his seeming incompetency."<br />

Previous to commencing development, all the<br />

information concerning the territory, dip, nature<br />

of roof, bottom, depth, etc, that it is possible to<br />

obtain, should find an expression in the finally<br />

adopted plan. This is an axiom among mining<br />

engineers generally, but not always followed.<br />

Often an engineer, to please his employer, will<br />

indorse and incorporate suggestions from him<br />

that he is convinced, by his knowledge of the nature<br />

of the territory, should not be countenanced,<br />

yet lacking the courage of his convictions they<br />

become part and parcel of the scheme to the future<br />

monetary loss of those he has patronized and the<br />

detraction of his own character as an efficient<br />

engineer. To a large number of operators any<br />

scheme of mining that necessitates large ribs and<br />

pillars is looked upon as wasteful and costly.<br />

How much more so is one that proves inadequate.<br />

bringing on a creep, burying beyond hope of re­<br />

covery, thousands of tons of coal, not to mention<br />

posts, rails, ties, etc.<br />

The one all-important point to provide for in<br />

room work is sufficient coal for room and rib to<br />

ensure the stability of the working at all stages<br />

of development. In the case cited above one<br />

might ask, why were the rooms not cut down to<br />

21 feet? This would not have prevented the<br />

crash, as 12 feet of rib was not enough. A com­<br />

mon fault of many systems of mining is their<br />

inflexibility, no opportunity is given the superin­<br />

tendent or foreman to exercise his judgment.<br />

Take 33-foot room centers; in a shallow-covered<br />

coal it will answer, but, how foolish to insist that<br />

it is just the thing for all depths as some do.<br />

Should the workings underlie the surface 300 to<br />

600 feet the inevitable result follows, a creep.<br />

Superintendent and foreman see it coming; they<br />

are powerless; to drive rooms less than 21 feet<br />

means a battle with the miners, this is a very<br />

effectual barricade in that direction and the en­<br />

gineer has just as effectually blocked him in the<br />

other.<br />

Let your superintendents have a little swing;<br />

give them a plan pliable in its nature, something<br />

they can bend to fit irregularities, say, 39 foot<br />

centers; on your maps place contours of the sur­<br />

face; say to him, here is a part of our property<br />

where you will have only 100 feet of surface, try<br />

and drive your rooms about 27 feet wide here,<br />

leaving a 12-foot rib. now here are about 250<br />

acres where the depth to the coal increases 300<br />

feet, rooms should je 24 feet wide, ribs 15 feet.<br />

Further over toward the boundary line you will<br />

observe the contours show 400 to 600 feet; rooms<br />

must not be more than 21 feet providing 18-foot<br />

ribs. All these changes can be effected without<br />

change of track or partings. Thus, under nearly<br />

all surface conditions to be met with, generally<br />

speaking, creeps can be prevented. This advice<br />

was given by the inspector in the case cited and<br />

it was adopted. 'this was nearly two years ago<br />

and we have not heard of any creeps since. At<br />

the same time chain pillars were increased from<br />

30 to 45 feet to allow of machine room to be<br />

driven up the center when the entries stumps are<br />

being cleaned out. Besides no rooms are turned<br />

nearer than 150 to 200 feet to the main entries.<br />

(To BE CONTINUED).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!