COAL - Clpdigital.org
COAL - Clpdigital.org
COAL - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
28 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />
hard times, more severe than the 1893 panic, will<br />
lie on us in a few years. With the ruling stable<br />
industrial conditions, disregarding the coal trade<br />
which has only barely started to recovery from<br />
over-production, the wise labor leader will avoid<br />
wild demands.<br />
A report of the board of trade on strikes and<br />
lockouts in the United Kingdom in the year 1904<br />
just issued, shows that 354 labor disputes were<br />
recorded during the year, involving about 87,000<br />
work people, or less than 1 per cent, of the indus<br />
trial population of the country, exclusive of agri<br />
cultural iaborers and seamen. The disputes, old<br />
and new. which were presented for arbitration and<br />
settlement in 1904, resulted in the loss of about<br />
1.450,000 working days. More than two-fifths of<br />
the disputes arose in the mining and quarrying<br />
industries. The average annual number of labor<br />
disputes in the five years from 1899 to 1903 was<br />
568. The average number of work people affected<br />
was 184,000. and the average duration of the dis<br />
putes was 3.125,000 days. In the five preceding<br />
years, from 1894 to 1898, the average annual num<br />
ber of disputes was 835; the average number of<br />
work people affected, 254,000, and the average dura<br />
tion of the disputes 8,927,000 days. The principal<br />
cause of the labor difficulties in 1904, as in pre<br />
vious years ,was the wage question.<br />
There are many unemployed in Great Britain at<br />
the present time, and great unrest prevails among<br />
the cotton workers because of dissatisfaction with<br />
the scale of wages paid, but misunderstandings<br />
between employers and employes seem to be di<br />
minishing, and to be more readily adjusted.<br />
Whether or not this is merely a passing phase of<br />
the labor situation in the United Kingdom or an<br />
indication of growing good will between the em<br />
ployers and the wage earners can only be deter<br />
mined by future developments.<br />
* * *<br />
MR. HERMAN JUSTI, COMMISSIONER, Illinois Coal<br />
Operators Association, delivered on Labor Day at<br />
Joliet, 111., an address reproduced elsewhere in<br />
this issue, on the system of joint trade agree<br />
ments, taking the ground that they are the means,<br />
when properly employed, of elevating labor, re<br />
warding capital and promoting industrial peace.<br />
Whilst Mr. Justi has dealt exhaustively with the<br />
subject before, his newest address is refreshing in<br />
its vigorous and fair treatment of this important<br />
issue. "When properly employed." is the saving<br />
clause or key which forestalls contest and this<br />
is never lost sight of in Mr. Justi's address. His<br />
ideas do not contemplate such agreements as those<br />
in the window glass trade which were among the<br />
telling factors bringing the American Window<br />
Glass Co. to grief. The life of these agreements<br />
was prolonged by adding recklessly to wages and<br />
curtailing production, the two movements a sure<br />
road to the pitfall. Then it is too patent how<br />
over-confidence-in the trade agreement relationship<br />
led to Homestead, how it has held countless num<br />
bers of skilled and unskilled workers abroad<br />
to idleness or to hand-to-mouth existence through<br />
effort in other lines. Mr. Justi rightly sees good<br />
in the joint agreement only when properly em<br />
ployed.<br />
* * *<br />
THERE ARE RENEWED RUMORS that the president's<br />
next message to congress will include a recom<br />
mendation for a department of mining. The in<br />
dustry of mining has become a tremendous affair<br />
in the United States, and the mineral production<br />
of 1900 was valued at $1,600,000,000. This nation<br />
leads in coal, iron and zinc, is second only to the<br />
Witwatserand in gold and next to Mexico in the<br />
output of silver. Why not a department of mining?<br />
UNITED STATES THE<br />
WORLD'S <strong>COAL</strong> POWER.<br />
Europe's coal deposits, including England, Scotland,<br />
Ireland and Wales, cover not exceeding 15,000<br />
square miles, and will cease to yield in 250 years<br />
a,t present rates of production. The United<br />
States, with Alaska and the Philippines yet to<br />
hear from, has 250,000 square miles of coal area,<br />
producing 325,000,000 tons yearly. This vast deposit<br />
can safely be relied on to last 7,000 years<br />
if the annual production remains the same. The<br />
United States is already producing 32 per cent.<br />
of the world's coal supply, although it has only<br />
6 per cent, of the world's population. That coal<br />
exists in large quantities in Alaska and the Philippines<br />
is known though, as yet, reliable estimates<br />
of possible yield are not available. Still, enough<br />
is known to justify the belief that the yield will<br />
tie enormous. Moreover, no one has yet the right<br />
to say that the United States proper has not still<br />
undiscovered coal fields within its area. Control<br />
of the world's coal means, if desired, control of the<br />
world's peace.