27.07.2013 Views

COAL - Clpdigital.org

COAL - Clpdigital.org

COAL - Clpdigital.org

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

28 THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN.<br />

hard times, more severe than the 1893 panic, will<br />

lie on us in a few years. With the ruling stable<br />

industrial conditions, disregarding the coal trade<br />

which has only barely started to recovery from<br />

over-production, the wise labor leader will avoid<br />

wild demands.<br />

A report of the board of trade on strikes and<br />

lockouts in the United Kingdom in the year 1904<br />

just issued, shows that 354 labor disputes were<br />

recorded during the year, involving about 87,000<br />

work people, or less than 1 per cent, of the indus­<br />

trial population of the country, exclusive of agri­<br />

cultural iaborers and seamen. The disputes, old<br />

and new. which were presented for arbitration and<br />

settlement in 1904, resulted in the loss of about<br />

1.450,000 working days. More than two-fifths of<br />

the disputes arose in the mining and quarrying<br />

industries. The average annual number of labor<br />

disputes in the five years from 1899 to 1903 was<br />

568. The average number of work people affected<br />

was 184,000. and the average duration of the dis­<br />

putes was 3.125,000 days. In the five preceding<br />

years, from 1894 to 1898, the average annual num­<br />

ber of disputes was 835; the average number of<br />

work people affected, 254,000, and the average dura­<br />

tion of the disputes 8,927,000 days. The principal<br />

cause of the labor difficulties in 1904, as in pre­<br />

vious years ,was the wage question.<br />

There are many unemployed in Great Britain at<br />

the present time, and great unrest prevails among<br />

the cotton workers because of dissatisfaction with<br />

the scale of wages paid, but misunderstandings<br />

between employers and employes seem to be di­<br />

minishing, and to be more readily adjusted.<br />

Whether or not this is merely a passing phase of<br />

the labor situation in the United Kingdom or an<br />

indication of growing good will between the em­<br />

ployers and the wage earners can only be deter­<br />

mined by future developments.<br />

* * *<br />

MR. HERMAN JUSTI, COMMISSIONER, Illinois Coal<br />

Operators Association, delivered on Labor Day at<br />

Joliet, 111., an address reproduced elsewhere in<br />

this issue, on the system of joint trade agree­<br />

ments, taking the ground that they are the means,<br />

when properly employed, of elevating labor, re­<br />

warding capital and promoting industrial peace.<br />

Whilst Mr. Justi has dealt exhaustively with the<br />

subject before, his newest address is refreshing in<br />

its vigorous and fair treatment of this important<br />

issue. "When properly employed." is the saving<br />

clause or key which forestalls contest and this<br />

is never lost sight of in Mr. Justi's address. His<br />

ideas do not contemplate such agreements as those<br />

in the window glass trade which were among the<br />

telling factors bringing the American Window<br />

Glass Co. to grief. The life of these agreements<br />

was prolonged by adding recklessly to wages and<br />

curtailing production, the two movements a sure<br />

road to the pitfall. Then it is too patent how<br />

over-confidence-in the trade agreement relationship<br />

led to Homestead, how it has held countless num­<br />

bers of skilled and unskilled workers abroad<br />

to idleness or to hand-to-mouth existence through<br />

effort in other lines. Mr. Justi rightly sees good<br />

in the joint agreement only when properly em­<br />

ployed.<br />

* * *<br />

THERE ARE RENEWED RUMORS that the president's<br />

next message to congress will include a recom­<br />

mendation for a department of mining. The in­<br />

dustry of mining has become a tremendous affair<br />

in the United States, and the mineral production<br />

of 1900 was valued at $1,600,000,000. This nation<br />

leads in coal, iron and zinc, is second only to the<br />

Witwatserand in gold and next to Mexico in the<br />

output of silver. Why not a department of mining?<br />

UNITED STATES THE<br />

WORLD'S <strong>COAL</strong> POWER.<br />

Europe's coal deposits, including England, Scotland,<br />

Ireland and Wales, cover not exceeding 15,000<br />

square miles, and will cease to yield in 250 years<br />

a,t present rates of production. The United<br />

States, with Alaska and the Philippines yet to<br />

hear from, has 250,000 square miles of coal area,<br />

producing 325,000,000 tons yearly. This vast deposit<br />

can safely be relied on to last 7,000 years<br />

if the annual production remains the same. The<br />

United States is already producing 32 per cent.<br />

of the world's coal supply, although it has only<br />

6 per cent, of the world's population. That coal<br />

exists in large quantities in Alaska and the Philippines<br />

is known though, as yet, reliable estimates<br />

of possible yield are not available. Still, enough<br />

is known to justify the belief that the yield will<br />

tie enormous. Moreover, no one has yet the right<br />

to say that the United States proper has not still<br />

undiscovered coal fields within its area. Control<br />

of the world's coal means, if desired, control of the<br />

world's peace.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!