COAL - Clpdigital.org
COAL - Clpdigital.org
COAL - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>COAL</strong> TRADE COMPARISONS<br />
BASED ON ILLINOIS REPORT.<br />
The following excerpt from the Illinois coal report<br />
for 1904, besides presenting some interesting<br />
comparisons, shows that conditions in the state<br />
were much better last year than this, and that some<br />
of this year's important events in the trade, particularly<br />
in the matter of legislation, were at least<br />
partially foreseen:<br />
As one of the basic industries of the country.<br />
the business of coal mining continues strong and<br />
active. The year just closed has been in every<br />
respect the most prosperous for the Illinois miners.<br />
This state maintains its lead, notwithstanding the<br />
wonderful development of the past few years, as<br />
the second largest coal producer in the country.<br />
Figures for 1904 indicate an aggregate tonnage in<br />
excess of thirty-seven millions. This total, divided<br />
by the number of coal miners, gives an<br />
average per capita product of but a fraction less<br />
than 1,000 tons, an amount relatively greater than<br />
during any previous period. This showing is the<br />
more remarkable when compared with the per<br />
capjita product of foreign countries. For the<br />
United Kingdom it is 287 tons; Germany. 242 tons;<br />
France, 198 tons; and Belgium, 166 tons. The<br />
disparity in these figures shows that the miners employed<br />
in the United States are vastly more productive<br />
than are their European competitors. The<br />
difference in favor of the miner in America is not<br />
due, it is fair to say, to superior skill as a workman;<br />
on the contrary, it is but just to admit that,<br />
considered from the point of handicraft, the<br />
foreign and particularly the British miner is the<br />
better workman, in fact the best class of pick men<br />
in American mines today come from the British<br />
Isles. The American miner's superiority as a producer<br />
is explained in the fact that better and easier<br />
conditions of mining prevail here; besides, machinery<br />
is utilized to a greater extent in the mining<br />
of coal, as in other industrial departments in this<br />
country, than anywhere else In thicker coal<br />
seams of this state the necessity for the pick miner<br />
seems to have entirely disappeared. Even the<br />
physical exercise formerly required in drilling has<br />
been obviated through the introduction of machines<br />
for that purpose.<br />
The immediate commercial effect of this is shown<br />
in the diminished value of the output, which is most<br />
important when the nation's manufacturing power<br />
is considered. The country having access to the<br />
greatest supply of cheap coal is destined to lead in<br />
the struggle of nations. To this fact more, we<br />
believe, than to any other, can be justly ascribed<br />
the constantly increasing power of the American<br />
nation.<br />
There are employed in the coal mines of Great<br />
Britain nearly 900,000 men. and they produced<br />
last year fully fifty million tons of coal less than<br />
THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN. 43<br />
the 525.000 miners employed in the Uuited States:<br />
while the cost or value of the product, there was<br />
nearly $100,000,000 more. We select Great Britain<br />
for the purpose of comparison because it is the<br />
most advanced of European countries, and until<br />
quite recently was first in the list of manufacturing<br />
nations. Those who have had experience in<br />
both countries know that investments in coal properties<br />
yield very much larger profits there than<br />
here.<br />
Aside from those that are pecuniarily interested<br />
in the coal business, the chief concern of the<br />
humanitarian is the loss of lives incident to the<br />
operation of the mines. Mortality from different<br />
causes seems to keep pace with the volume of production.<br />
The year covered by this report exceeds<br />
all others, the number killed being 157, or 2.S7<br />
per 1,000 employes. This is more than one-half<br />
over the fatal accident rate in the British mines.<br />
The number of non-fatal accidents was 507, an increase<br />
of ninety-seven over the previous year.<br />
According to the table of classified causes, onehalf<br />
of the fatal and non-fatal accidents resulted<br />
from falling coal and rock. It is impossible to<br />
determine the per cent, of accidents listed under<br />
this head, due to the use of powder. Although the<br />
majority of them accrue in the districts where the<br />
method of blasting off the solid prevails. Whatever<br />
the causes, whether they result from the lack<br />
of knowledge in the preparation of blasts, the drilling<br />
of dead holes, the adulteration of explosives,<br />
the accumulation of dust on the roadways, blasting<br />
off the solid, or the indifference or carelessness<br />
of men accustomed to the dangers of the miner's<br />
occupation, the death rate particularly is entirely<br />
too high and some other measures should be tried<br />
to reduce it. It was hoped the law passed by the<br />
last general assembly, limiting the quantity of<br />
powder to be used in any one blast, would diminish<br />
the fatalities heretofore due to that source. The law<br />
has been in force nearly two years and the number<br />
of fatal accidents, instead of diminishing, has,<br />
in fact, increased. Either its requirements have<br />
not been observed by the miners, or the facts are<br />
strangely out of joint with our expectations. Of<br />
several propositions that have been offered, two<br />
are worthy of some consideration. The first, proposed<br />
by representatives of coal operators, is that<br />
the present run of mine system be abolished and<br />
the miners required to under-cut or shear the coal.<br />
To require that all coal be undermined would.<br />
to a very great extent, dispense with the necessity<br />
for powder and naturally avoid the accidents due<br />
to the use of explosives; and that regardless of<br />
whether the present system of paying for mining<br />
coal is to be continued or not. The objections<br />
urged to this plan are two-fold: First, that the<br />
mine run system of this state is provided for by<br />
contract, presumably satisfactory to both interests