COAL - Clpdigital.org
COAL - Clpdigital.org
COAL - Clpdigital.org
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
(CoNTINl ED FROM JlI.Y 1).<br />
METHODS OF MINE VENTILATION; MINE<br />
FANS, FURNACES, STEAM JETS AND<br />
THEIR RELATIVE ADVANTAGES CON<br />
SIDERED.*<br />
The arrangement of the cut-off is of considerable<br />
importance. There are many engineers who<br />
believe that a V-shaped shutter, sometimes called<br />
the Walker shutter, is an indispensable adjunct<br />
to avoid vibrating in the fan. We have heard<br />
fans that pounded and vibrated so as to shake<br />
the ground, and we have known this defect remedied<br />
by introducing a shutter which was not<br />
always a V-shaped shutter. This trouble may<br />
be due to one of three causes: First, a lack of<br />
proportionment in the fan. Second, a too rapid<br />
and too large expansion of the spiral casing be<br />
ginning at the point of cutoff. Third, abutting<br />
the current against a flat surface, etc.<br />
The velocity of intake at the central opening<br />
or eye of the fan should not exceed 1500 feet per<br />
minute. From this you will see that we favor<br />
double intake fans. The velocity of the periphery<br />
flow or the velocity of air in the spiral conduit<br />
should be a uniform velocity when the casing is<br />
properly expanded. This velocity measured at<br />
the point of cut-off should at least equal the velocity<br />
of the blade tips; or, in other words, the<br />
sectional area of the spiral conduit should be such<br />
that air will at least travel with the fan and not<br />
fall behind it.<br />
In endeavoring to point out some of the principles<br />
that govern the proportions of fans used<br />
to ventilate mines, and by working an example<br />
or two, we hope to give some help to mining<br />
men who are from time to time called to perform<br />
the somewhat bewildering task of selecting<br />
a fan for some particular mine. The formulas<br />
that appear in text books or mining journals have<br />
for their object the simplifying and mak'ng plain<br />
the underlying principles of the fan, yet they are<br />
so complex and complicated in character that the<br />
ordinary mining student cannot grasp them.<br />
Quoting Mr. William Clifford's views: Several of<br />
our mining text books very clearly deHne the<br />
law that resistance of the flow of air in a mine<br />
increases as the square of the quantity or volume,<br />
and this will be shown, as we proceed, to be<br />
A LEADING FACTOR<br />
in fan calculations. One of the simplest formula<br />
and most easily to be understood and one which<br />
has been unanimously accepted by mining engineers<br />
tollows:<br />
U indicates speed of tips of vane in feet per<br />
second.<br />
G indicates 32 2-10, the velocity in feet that a<br />
falling body has acquired at the end of the first<br />
second.<br />
*By I. G. ltoby, of Uniontown, Pa,<br />
THE <strong>COAL</strong> TRADE BULLETIN. 47<br />
.00125 equals the weight of a body of air whose<br />
bulk of water weighs 1 -800th, the relative weight<br />
of air and water commonly assumed in text books.<br />
12 inches equals a foot; the water gauge being<br />
read in inches, 62% Ios. being the weight of one<br />
cubic foot of water; this divided by 12 equals the<br />
weight of a square foot of water 1 inch deep, or<br />
the weight of 144 inches of water.<br />
The water gauge that would be produced by the<br />
above equation of formula is not that which we<br />
may expect to see in a fan drift, but is that oshich<br />
would be produced if the fan and its surrounding<br />
conditions were complete and in perfect adjustment.<br />
The percentage utilized, which we<br />
note reading the water gauge producing this equation<br />
will give the manometric efficiency of our fan.<br />
This efficiency varies in two ways; one depending<br />
upon the mine, and one depending on the construction<br />
of the fan.<br />
Here I must extend my acknowledgment to Mr.<br />
William Clifford for some very important information<br />
and suggestions, which will follow<br />
First: "We will note that the mine will not<br />
allow the column the fan displaces to pass it, the<br />
depression produced by the velocity of the tips of<br />
the blades."<br />
Second: "The fan may produce a false water<br />
gauge higher than the true statistical gauge. High<br />
manometric efficienty by no means of the mine<br />
proves a good fan."<br />
"Three properties in fans present themselves for<br />
consideration, and, in my judgment, they are noted<br />
in the order of their importance.<br />
"(A) Volumetric efficiency, or what is often<br />
termed in text books and mining literature generally<br />
body output: this is the proportion or excess<br />
of the displacement of the fan considered as a revolving<br />
cylinder shown by the volume produced<br />
by a fan.<br />
"(B) The mechanical efficiency is the proportion<br />
of the power applied to drive a fan that is<br />
utilized in producing air and in overcoming resistance<br />
in the mine and drifts, though we must<br />
add in the resistance of the fan itself. (This notation<br />
does not apply to the Capell fan).<br />
"(C) The manometric efficiency is the proportion<br />
of the force of the velocity of the tips of the<br />
vanes considered as a fallen body utilized in producing<br />
actual depression. In ascertaining volumetric<br />
efficiency we take the whole cylindrical<br />
contents, including the shaft and solid members<br />
of the fan wheel and compare the displacements of<br />
the cylinder through one revolution, or preferably<br />
through one minute, with the column of air passed<br />
during the period or time, with the displacement<br />
as a divisor and the column as a dividend.<br />
"It is suggested that in making calculations<br />
the observer or experimenter should be particu-