26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>: <strong>what</strong> <strong>does</strong> <strong>it</strong> <strong>really</strong> <strong>mean</strong>?<br />

from the proposed reform over the whole of their life beyond SPA. Only 2%<br />

would lose; this is confined to those w<strong>it</strong>h fewer than 10 years of contributions<br />

and those who lose out from the abol<strong>it</strong>ion of derived <strong>pension</strong>s based on a<br />

partner’s contribution record.<br />

• However, some gains in state <strong>pension</strong> income will be offset by reductions in<br />

<strong>mean</strong>s-tested benef<strong>it</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements, including those arising from the abol<strong>it</strong>ion<br />

of the <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong> savings cred<strong>it</strong>. While 64% of individuals in the lowest<br />

wealth quintile would receive higher <strong>pension</strong> income as a result of the<br />

reforms, only 40% of them would find that their household’s net income<br />

would be higher after taking into account reductions in <strong>mean</strong>s-tested <strong>pension</strong><br />

cred<strong>it</strong>.<br />

Long-run effect of the proposed reforms<br />

In the longer term, the new system will be less generous to just about everyone<br />

than the system that <strong>it</strong> is replacing. This certainly includes anyone born in 1986<br />

or later and potentially includes cohorts born as early as 1966. That is because<br />

the accrual rate will be lower than the combined accrual rate of the basic state<br />

<strong>pension</strong> and state second <strong>pension</strong>, and because almost all the same activ<strong>it</strong>ies<br />

create ent<strong>it</strong>lement under the current regime as under the new one. Particularly<br />

worse off are those who contribute for longer, whether through paid<br />

employment, caring or receiving disabil<strong>it</strong>y-related benef<strong>it</strong>s.<br />

Although the more generous indexation arrangements under the proposed<br />

system would narrow the gap between income under the current and the<br />

proposed system through retirement, most people would have to live to over 100<br />

to be better off overall.<br />

<strong>The</strong> only significant exceptions will be the long-term self-employed and people<br />

who will start to receive cred<strong>it</strong>s to the basic state <strong>pension</strong> (but not the state<br />

second <strong>pension</strong>) under universal cred<strong>it</strong>. However, <strong>it</strong> remains to be seen whether<br />

the self-employed will be asked to pay higher National Insurance contributions,<br />

which could offset this gain.<br />

Wider implications of the proposed reforms<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed reform may encourage private saving for three reasons. First, <strong>it</strong><br />

will result in a reduction in the state <strong>pension</strong> income most younger individuals<br />

can expect, and therefore they may wish to increase their private saving to<br />

compensate for this. Second, the reform should also increase clar<strong>it</strong>y about <strong>what</strong><br />

individuals can expect to get from the state in retirement. This could lead to an<br />

increase in private saving e<strong>it</strong>her if <strong>it</strong> enables individuals to better engage w<strong>it</strong>h<br />

decisions about <strong>pension</strong> saving or if <strong>it</strong> makes individuals more aware of how l<strong>it</strong>tle<br />

they can expect from the state.<br />

<strong>The</strong> new system will be cheaper and simpler than the system <strong>it</strong> is replacing. <strong>The</strong><br />

Department for Work and Pensions estimates that the new <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong><br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!