26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive Summary<br />

A significant reform of the UK’s state <strong>pension</strong> system is currently being enacted.<br />

From 2016–17, the basic state <strong>pension</strong> and state second <strong>pension</strong> will be replaced<br />

by a new <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> for everyone below the state <strong>pension</strong> age (SPA). This<br />

will bring an end to earnings-related state <strong>pension</strong> accrual in the UK. This marks<br />

the latest step on a long, tortuous and rather circular journey – a journey that<br />

started in the early 1970s w<strong>it</strong>h a basic state <strong>pension</strong> worth about £145 a week (in<br />

current earnings terms) and that has finally ended up in much the same place.<br />

<strong>The</strong> major difference between the 1974 system and the proposed new system is<br />

that the new system will be essentially universal, w<strong>it</strong>h considerably more<br />

extensive cred<strong>it</strong>ing of unpaid activ<strong>it</strong>ies than was available in 1974.<br />

Short-run effect of the proposed reform<br />

We have been able to use a unique data set combining lifetime National<br />

Insurance contribution histories w<strong>it</strong>h detailed micro data from the English<br />

Long<strong>it</strong>udinal Study of Ageing to look at who will benef<strong>it</strong> from these reforms<br />

among the first generations of those reaching SPA from 2016. Of those living in<br />

England who will h<strong>it</strong> state <strong>pension</strong> age between 6 April 2016 and 5 April 2020,<br />

we estimate that:<br />

• 18% of individuals (6% of men and 44% of women) would gain from the<br />

retrospective cred<strong>it</strong>ing of activ<strong>it</strong>ies that, at the time, only gave ent<strong>it</strong>lement to<br />

the basic state <strong>pension</strong> or to a low level of SERPS. This includes periods of<br />

self-employment, and periods of caring activ<strong>it</strong>ies, childcare or low earnings<br />

before 2002.<br />

• Overall, 35% of men and 61% of women (43% of individuals) would see their<br />

<strong>pension</strong> income at SPA increased as a result of the proposed reform. Many of<br />

these individuals will be benef<strong>it</strong>ing from the abil<strong>it</strong>y to ‘work off’ previous<br />

periods of contracting out.<br />

• 19% of individuals (21% of men and 14% of women) will find that the<br />

income they can expect at the state <strong>pension</strong> age under the proposed system is<br />

lower than they could have achieved under the current system.<br />

• <strong>The</strong> average change in <strong>pension</strong> income at SPA across all individuals is an<br />

increase of £2.74; 7% of men and 26% of women would see an increase of at<br />

least £10 per week.<br />

• Gains are largest among those who have spent periods out of the labour<br />

market caring for children and those who have had long periods of selfemployment.<br />

<strong>The</strong> average gain among women is £5.23 per week; the average<br />

gain among those who have had more than 10 years in self-employment is<br />

£7.51 per week.<br />

• Taking into account the more generous indexation of the state <strong>pension</strong> in<br />

retirement under the proposed system, 98% of individuals would benef<strong>it</strong><br />

1<br />

© Inst<strong>it</strong>ute for Fiscal Studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!