26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>: <strong>what</strong> <strong>does</strong> <strong>it</strong> <strong>really</strong> <strong>mean</strong>?<br />

Box 5.2. Effect of the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> and abol<strong>it</strong>ion of <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong><br />

savings cred<strong>it</strong> on James’s income in retirement<br />

<strong>The</strong> following example describes a hypothetical individual, James, born in<br />

1986. As described in Box 5.1, he accrues 45 years of cred<strong>it</strong>s to the BSP (or the<br />

<strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>) through self-employment.<br />

Under the current <strong>pension</strong> system, James’s state <strong>pension</strong> income at SPA will be<br />

£109 per week. James has saved into a private <strong>pension</strong> and he expects to receive<br />

£25 a week of income from these savings. James receives £7 of PCGC and £2 of<br />

PCSC. <strong>For</strong> every add<strong>it</strong>ional £1 of private saving, he has £1 of PCGC w<strong>it</strong>hdrawn,<br />

but he gets an extra 60p of PCSC, giving him some incentive to save privately.<br />

Under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> system, James’s state <strong>pension</strong> income at SPA<br />

would instead be £146.30, and his private <strong>pension</strong> income would take him well<br />

above the PCGC level. He would receive no top-up to his income from the PCGC<br />

(the PCSC would no longer exist). His marginal incentive to save into a private<br />

<strong>pension</strong> would therefore be improved: instead of 60p of extra income from each<br />

extra £1 of saved income, James would expect to keep all of the add<strong>it</strong>ional<br />

income. (However, the higher level of state <strong>pension</strong> income he expects to get<br />

under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system may decrease his incentive to save privately.)<br />

Box 5.3. Effect of the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> on Zach’s income in retirement<br />

<strong>The</strong> following example describes a hypothetical individual, Zach, born in 1986.<br />

As described in Box 5.1, he accrues 30 years of cred<strong>it</strong>s to the BSP and S2P (or<br />

the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>) through earnings.<br />

Under the current <strong>pension</strong> system, Zach’s state <strong>pension</strong> income at SPA will be<br />

£156.80 per week, taking him just over the maximum income threshold for<br />

PCSC eligibil<strong>it</strong>y. He will therefore expect to keep any income he receives from<br />

his private <strong>pension</strong> saving – none of <strong>it</strong> will be w<strong>it</strong>hdrawn through <strong>mean</strong>s-tested<br />

benef<strong>it</strong>s.<br />

Under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> system, as Zach has only 30 years of ent<strong>it</strong>lement,<br />

his <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement of £125.40 will fall below the level of the<br />

PCGC. He will have his income topped up by the government to the PCGC level<br />

of £141.10. However, for each £1 of income that he receives from his private<br />

savings, he will face the w<strong>it</strong>hdrawal of £1 of his PCGC ent<strong>it</strong>lement. He therefore<br />

will have no incentive to save privately for retirement.<br />

<strong>The</strong> above discussion implic<strong>it</strong>ly assumes that all those who would be eligible for<br />

PC would take <strong>it</strong> up. In real<strong>it</strong>y, take-up is not 100%; DWP estimates that, although<br />

in 2009–10 between 73% and 80% of those eligible for <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong> guarantee<br />

cred<strong>it</strong> actually claimed <strong>it</strong>, only 43–48% of those eligible for the savings cred<strong>it</strong><br />

claimed <strong>it</strong>. 65 <strong>For</strong> individuals who might qualify for PCSC but do not intend to take<br />

65 Department for Work and Pensions, 2013f.<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!