26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5. Long-Run Effect of the Proposed<br />

Reforms on Pensioner Incomes<br />

In this chapter, we attempt to clarify the long-run impact of the proposed<br />

reforms. <strong>The</strong> important distinction we draw between the ‘long-run’ effect of the<br />

policy (in this chapter) and the ‘short-run’ effect (discussed in Chapter 4) is<br />

between the effects on those who have spent most of their working lives under<br />

the S2P system (‘long-run’) and those who had a significant period under the<br />

SERPS system (‘short-run’). Individuals who started their working lives in 2002<br />

or later (born in 1986 or later) will have spent their entire working lives under<br />

the S2P system, as this was introduced in 2002. This group can, therefore,<br />

certainly be considered as falling w<strong>it</strong>hin our long-run analysis. In add<strong>it</strong>ion, our<br />

conclusions on the long run will also apply to those earlier cohorts who will have<br />

spent a large proportion of their working life under the current system, including<br />

those expecting to accrue at least 31 years of cred<strong>it</strong>able activ<strong>it</strong>ies between 2002<br />

and their SPA. This latter group could include individuals born as early as 1966,<br />

depending on their work histories.<br />

<strong>For</strong> many of our illustrations, we focus on individuals who were aged 16 in 2002;<br />

these people were born in 1986 and will reach SPA in 2054. We examine this<br />

group because they are the first group to have spent their entire working lives<br />

under the S2P system. This group would also spend the vast major<strong>it</strong>y of their<br />

working lives under the proposed system, if <strong>it</strong> is implemented, as currently<br />

planned, in April 2016.<br />

This chapter describes how incomes in retirement (from both state <strong>pension</strong>s and<br />

<strong>mean</strong>s-tested benef<strong>it</strong>s) would differ under the current and proposed systems in<br />

the long run. Sections 5.1–5.3 focus solely on state <strong>pension</strong> income, while Section<br />

5.4 considers <strong>what</strong> impact the proposed reforms will have on income from<br />

<strong>mean</strong>s-tested benef<strong>it</strong>s. Section 5.5 provides a summary.<br />

5.1 How would the level of state <strong>pension</strong> income<br />

received at state <strong>pension</strong> age compare?<br />

Table 3.1 indicated that the vast major<strong>it</strong>y of people who would accrue<br />

ent<strong>it</strong>lement to the proposed <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> would also accrue ent<strong>it</strong>lement to<br />

both the BSP and the S2P under the current system. 51 In this section, we focus on<br />

how accrual of both BSP and S2P compares w<strong>it</strong>h accrual of <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>.<br />

51 Of those getting a qualifying year in 2011, 72% got them via class 1 contributions, which would<br />

also earn S2P ent<strong>it</strong>lement; 18% accrued a qualifying year via cred<strong>it</strong>s, and many of these people<br />

would also have earned a qualifying year to S2P; and 4% accrued a qualifying year through a<br />

combination of cred<strong>it</strong>s and class 1 contributions. Source: DWP 1% sample of the National<br />

Insurance Recording System (NIRS2).<br />

48<br />

© Inst<strong>it</strong>ute for Fiscal Studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!