A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...
A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...
A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Short-run effect on <strong>pension</strong>er incomes<br />
only to individuals w<strong>it</strong>h less than 30 (or perhaps 35) qualifying years for BSP,<br />
who would be the only ones to have benef<strong>it</strong>ed from them under the current<br />
system.<br />
4.3 Gains and losses over the whole of retirement<br />
<strong>The</strong> previous section discussed how many and <strong>what</strong> type of individuals would<br />
gain from the proposed <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> in terms of <strong>pension</strong> income at the SPA.<br />
However, as described in Chapter 3, the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> and the state <strong>pension</strong><br />
under current legislation are uprated slightly differently through retirement.<br />
Under the current system, the BSP element is uprated by growth in average<br />
earnings through retirement, while the SERPS/S2P element is uprated by price<br />
inflation. Under the proposed system, <strong>pension</strong> income up to the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong><br />
amount would be uprated by average earnings growth, while any add<strong>it</strong>ional<br />
<strong>pension</strong> income above that level would be uprated by CPI inflation. This <strong>mean</strong>s<br />
that total (cash) state <strong>pension</strong> income will grow more quickly under the<br />
proposed system than under the current system. <strong>The</strong>refore, any losses in <strong>pension</strong><br />
income at SPA will be at least partially offset by higher indexation later on, and<br />
those who do not appear to benef<strong>it</strong> from the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> at SPA may<br />
benef<strong>it</strong> from higher income later in retirement.<br />
In this section, we consider whether individuals lose or gain from the proposed<br />
<strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system as a whole over the whole of their life beyond SPA. To do this,<br />
we calculate the ‘present discounted value’ (PDV) of state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements<br />
under the proposed and current <strong>pension</strong> systems. <strong>The</strong> PDV is calculated by<br />
summing the stream of <strong>pension</strong> payments expected from the state from SPA until<br />
death assuming that all individuals die at their age- and sex-specific life<br />
expectancy 49 and discounting future payments using an appropriate discount<br />
rate. 50<br />
Table 4.6 shows <strong>what</strong> proportion of people w<strong>it</strong>h different characteristics would<br />
have a PDV of ent<strong>it</strong>lements under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system that is greater or less<br />
than under the current system, and the <strong>mean</strong> change in the PDV from introducing<br />
the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>; a pos<strong>it</strong>ive value indicates that the PDV of ent<strong>it</strong>lements is<br />
greater under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system than under the current system. This is under<br />
the assumption that individuals continue contributing until they reach SPA.<br />
Across all individuals reaching SPA between 6 April 2016 and 5 April 2020, the<br />
average change in the PDV (i.e. increase in wealth) is £4,013. Only 2% of people<br />
would lose over the whole of their retirement – this is the group who would have<br />
49<br />
Life expectancies are taken from Office for National Statistics, 2009–2011 based cohort life<br />
tables.<br />
50 Table 4.6 assumes a 3% real discount rate. Using a higher discount rate will tend to increase the<br />
value of the current system relative to the proposed system, since under the current system a<br />
greater proportion of the total benef<strong>it</strong>s are received early in retirement. Conversely, using a lower<br />
discount rate will tend to increase the value of the proposed system relative to the current system.<br />
41