26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Short-run effect on <strong>pension</strong>er incomes<br />

only to individuals w<strong>it</strong>h less than 30 (or perhaps 35) qualifying years for BSP,<br />

who would be the only ones to have benef<strong>it</strong>ed from them under the current<br />

system.<br />

4.3 Gains and losses over the whole of retirement<br />

<strong>The</strong> previous section discussed how many and <strong>what</strong> type of individuals would<br />

gain from the proposed <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> in terms of <strong>pension</strong> income at the SPA.<br />

However, as described in Chapter 3, the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> and the state <strong>pension</strong><br />

under current legislation are uprated slightly differently through retirement.<br />

Under the current system, the BSP element is uprated by growth in average<br />

earnings through retirement, while the SERPS/S2P element is uprated by price<br />

inflation. Under the proposed system, <strong>pension</strong> income up to the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong><br />

amount would be uprated by average earnings growth, while any add<strong>it</strong>ional<br />

<strong>pension</strong> income above that level would be uprated by CPI inflation. This <strong>mean</strong>s<br />

that total (cash) state <strong>pension</strong> income will grow more quickly under the<br />

proposed system than under the current system. <strong>The</strong>refore, any losses in <strong>pension</strong><br />

income at SPA will be at least partially offset by higher indexation later on, and<br />

those who do not appear to benef<strong>it</strong> from the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> at SPA may<br />

benef<strong>it</strong> from higher income later in retirement.<br />

In this section, we consider whether individuals lose or gain from the proposed<br />

<strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system as a whole over the whole of their life beyond SPA. To do this,<br />

we calculate the ‘present discounted value’ (PDV) of state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements<br />

under the proposed and current <strong>pension</strong> systems. <strong>The</strong> PDV is calculated by<br />

summing the stream of <strong>pension</strong> payments expected from the state from SPA until<br />

death assuming that all individuals die at their age- and sex-specific life<br />

expectancy 49 and discounting future payments using an appropriate discount<br />

rate. 50<br />

Table 4.6 shows <strong>what</strong> proportion of people w<strong>it</strong>h different characteristics would<br />

have a PDV of ent<strong>it</strong>lements under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system that is greater or less<br />

than under the current system, and the <strong>mean</strong> change in the PDV from introducing<br />

the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>; a pos<strong>it</strong>ive value indicates that the PDV of ent<strong>it</strong>lements is<br />

greater under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system than under the current system. This is under<br />

the assumption that individuals continue contributing until they reach SPA.<br />

Across all individuals reaching SPA between 6 April 2016 and 5 April 2020, the<br />

average change in the PDV (i.e. increase in wealth) is £4,013. Only 2% of people<br />

would lose over the whole of their retirement – this is the group who would have<br />

49<br />

Life expectancies are taken from Office for National Statistics, 2009–2011 based cohort life<br />

tables.<br />

50 Table 4.6 assumes a 3% real discount rate. Using a higher discount rate will tend to increase the<br />

value of the current system relative to the proposed system, since under the current system a<br />

greater proportion of the total benef<strong>it</strong>s are received early in retirement. Conversely, using a lower<br />

discount rate will tend to increase the value of the proposed system relative to the current system.<br />

41

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!