26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

4. Short-Run Effect of the Proposed<br />

Reforms on Pensioner Incomes<br />

<strong>The</strong> proposed reforms have different implications in the short run from in the<br />

long run. This is because the state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements of people retiring in the<br />

next few decades are heavily affected by historic <strong>pension</strong>s legislation, which in<br />

particular treated unpaid activ<strong>it</strong>ies less generously. <strong>The</strong> proposed reforms aim to<br />

‘protect’ <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements that have already been accrued. <strong>The</strong>refore, the<br />

main effect in the very short term is to increase ent<strong>it</strong>lements for some groups,<br />

while leaving other groups’ ent<strong>it</strong>lements largely unchanged. <strong>The</strong>re are, however,<br />

some notable short-term losers, such as those who would have accrued fewer<br />

than 10 years of contributions by 2016; these people would receive no state<br />

<strong>pension</strong> income under the proposed rules unless they were able and chose to pay<br />

voluntary class 3 National Insurance contributions to improve their contribution<br />

records.<br />

In this chapter, we describe who, in the short term, will see their state <strong>pension</strong><br />

rights increased or decreased as a result of the proposed reforms. In particular,<br />

we focus on those who will be reaching SPA between 6 April 2016 and 5 April<br />

2020 – this group includes women born between 6 April 1953 and 5 July 1954<br />

and men born between 6 April 1951 and 5 July 1954. We make use of a unique<br />

data set that links individuals’ NI contribution histories w<strong>it</strong>h detailed survey<br />

information on their socio-demographic characteristics, financial circumstances<br />

and health. We briefly describe the data in Section 4.1.<br />

To make clear how the proposed reforms affect household incomes, we start by<br />

describing how they would affect individuals’ weekly state <strong>pension</strong> income at<br />

SPA (Section 4.2) and the present discounted value of their <strong>pension</strong> income over<br />

the whole of their retirement (Section 4.3). Obviously, for those who expect to be<br />

ent<strong>it</strong>led to some <strong>mean</strong>s-tested benef<strong>it</strong>s after SPA, some of these gains in state<br />

<strong>pension</strong> income will be offset by a reduction in <strong>mean</strong>s-tested ent<strong>it</strong>lement. Section<br />

4.4 therefore discusses how total household income will be affected by these<br />

reforms after taking into account eligibil<strong>it</strong>y for <strong>mean</strong>s-tested <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong> and<br />

the planned abol<strong>it</strong>ion of the savings cred<strong>it</strong> component. Section 4.5 summarises.<br />

4.1 Data<br />

In this chapter, we make use of a unique data set containing detailed household<br />

micro data linked to individual NI records to describe how the first few cohorts of<br />

individuals to retire under the new <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> would be affected by the<br />

reforms. <strong>The</strong> English Long<strong>it</strong>udinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) interviews a<br />

representative sample of the English household population aged 50 and over<br />

every two years – following the same individuals over time. <strong>The</strong> survey asks a<br />

huge range of questions covering – among other things – demographic<br />

characteristics, socio-economic circumstances, wealth, physical and mental<br />

health, social participation and cogn<strong>it</strong>ive function. Survey respondents were also<br />

25<br />

© Inst<strong>it</strong>ute for Fiscal Studies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!