26.07.2013 Views

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>: <strong>what</strong> <strong>does</strong> <strong>it</strong> <strong>really</strong> <strong>mean</strong>?<br />

• those who were employed on relatively low earnings (although still at or<br />

above the LEL) between 1978 and 2001 – these individuals will have accrued<br />

BSP but l<strong>it</strong>tle or no SERPS ent<strong>it</strong>lement;<br />

• those who were carrying out activ<strong>it</strong>ies prior to 2002 that earned ent<strong>it</strong>lement<br />

to BSP but not SERPS – for example, caring for children, caring for sick or<br />

disabled adults, or receiving certain out-of-work benef<strong>it</strong>s;<br />

• those who have been self-employed.<br />

<strong>For</strong> these types of individuals, the proposed system is likely to represent a<br />

windfall gain. As discussed in greater detail in Chapter 4, most of these ‘winners’<br />

are in earlier cohorts.<br />

In add<strong>it</strong>ion, those who have spent periods contracted out of SERPS/S2P will have<br />

the potential to accrue a larger total <strong>pension</strong> than otherwise-identical individuals<br />

who had been contracted in, as they will be able to ‘work off’ these contractedout<br />

years in order to qualify for an increased state <strong>pension</strong> w<strong>it</strong>h no loss of private<br />

<strong>pension</strong> from their years spent contracted out.<br />

Given the trans<strong>it</strong>ion rules proposed in the Wh<strong>it</strong>e Paper, almost no one would see<br />

a significant reduction in their accrued ent<strong>it</strong>lement as a result of the reform. 32<br />

Those whose foundation amount exceeded the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> level in 2016<br />

would have that ent<strong>it</strong>lement ‘protected’. 33 However, there are potentially a large<br />

number of individuals who have not yet reached the SPA who should anticipate<br />

accruing a state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement of more than £146.30 under the current<br />

system and who would, therefore, receive less under the proposed system than<br />

under the current one. As described in Chapter 5, these losers are most heavily<br />

concentrated in later cohorts – those who entered the labour market after (or not<br />

very long before) 2002.<br />

3.5 Changes to <strong>mean</strong>s-tested benef<strong>it</strong>s<br />

<strong>The</strong> current system of <strong>mean</strong>s-tested benef<strong>it</strong>s for <strong>pension</strong>ers includes the <strong>pension</strong><br />

cred<strong>it</strong>, which <strong>it</strong>self is comprised of two components – the <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong><br />

guarantee cred<strong>it</strong> (PCGC) and the <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong> savings cred<strong>it</strong> (PCSC).<br />

<strong>The</strong> PCGC tops up income to a minimum level (£145.40 for a <strong>single</strong> person and<br />

£222.05 for couples in 2013–14), whereas the PCSC was introduced to reward<br />

private saving and has a maximum award of £18.06 (£22.89 for couples). As of<br />

November 2012, 14% of 65- to 69-year-olds claimed the <strong>pension</strong> cred<strong>it</strong> and<br />

32 Some groups who do – those w<strong>it</strong>h fewer than 10 years of contributions and those who would<br />

have received <strong>pension</strong>s based on their spouse’s ent<strong>it</strong>lement who will now only receive a <strong>pension</strong><br />

based on their own contributions – are discussed in Chapter 4.<br />

33 <strong>The</strong> proposed ‘protection’ <strong>does</strong> actually const<strong>it</strong>ute a small reduction in <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements for<br />

this group. This is because state <strong>pension</strong> rights in excess of the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> level will only be<br />

uprated between 2016 and SPA in line w<strong>it</strong>h CPI inflation, rather than average earnings growth, as<br />

would happen under current legislation.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!