A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...
A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...
A single-tier pension: what does it really mean? - The Institute For ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Proposed reforms<br />
In contrast, under the proposed system, anyone w<strong>it</strong>h a foundation amount of at<br />
least £146.30 will not be able to accrue any more state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement. <strong>For</strong><br />
the individuals just described above, this <strong>mean</strong>s that ne<strong>it</strong>her Zainab nor<br />
Mohammed would be able to accrue any further state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement after<br />
2016, whereas Ava would be able to do so. (Ava would accrue £4.18 of extra state<br />
<strong>pension</strong> income for each add<strong>it</strong>ional year of contributions.) This is desp<strong>it</strong>e the fact<br />
that Mohammed and Ava have essentially paid the same net NI contributions in<br />
the past and will continue to do so in the future, if they both continue to work and<br />
earn the same amount.<br />
<strong>The</strong> apparent inequ<strong>it</strong>y between Mohammed and Ava in their abil<strong>it</strong>y to accrue<br />
further state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lements after 2016 arises from how the government<br />
has chosen to deal w<strong>it</strong>h past contracting out in the Pensions Bill reforms. <strong>The</strong><br />
option chosen <strong>mean</strong>s that the system will move more quickly towards a simple,<br />
easy-to-understand <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong>, in which most new <strong>pension</strong>ers will<br />
receive the full <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> <strong>pension</strong> from the state. However, <strong>it</strong> has the<br />
disadvantage that <strong>it</strong> treats individuals who contracted out in the past differently<br />
from those (otherwise-identical) individuals who contracted in.<br />
Indexation of <strong>pension</strong> rights after 2016<br />
From April 2016, up to £146.30 of individuals’ foundation amount ent<strong>it</strong>lement<br />
will be earnings indexed, while any state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement in excess of<br />
£146.30 will be increased by CPI inflation (this applies both before and after<br />
someone reaches SPA).<br />
Under current legislation, SERPS/S2P ent<strong>it</strong>lements are uprated by inflation after<br />
the SPA but revalued in line w<strong>it</strong>h average earnings growth during working life.<br />
<strong>For</strong> example, in 2016, Mohammed – described above – will get a foundation<br />
amount of £184.00 – equal to his current scheme valuation at that point. Under<br />
the current system, until he reaches the SPA, all of this £184.00 will be uprated<br />
each year in line w<strong>it</strong>h growth in average earnings. However, once he reaches SPA,<br />
his BSP ent<strong>it</strong>lement (£109.00) will continue to be uprated w<strong>it</strong>h average earnings<br />
growth, while his add<strong>it</strong>ional <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement (£75.00) will only be increased<br />
in line w<strong>it</strong>h CPI inflation. Under the <strong>single</strong>-<strong>tier</strong> system, from 2016 onwards<br />
£146.30 of his state <strong>pension</strong> ent<strong>it</strong>lement would be uprated in line w<strong>it</strong>h average<br />
earnings, while the remaining £37.70 would be increased in line w<strong>it</strong>h CPI<br />
inflation. This would continue after he reaches SPA.<br />
Whether specific individuals gain or lose from this change to uprating policy will<br />
depend on exactly how much their foundation amount exceeds £146.30 and how<br />
many years they have left before they reach the SPA.<br />
<strong>The</strong> implications of trans<strong>it</strong>ion<br />
<strong>The</strong> proposed <strong>pension</strong> system will result in a significant windfall increase in the<br />
state <strong>pension</strong> rights of three particular groups:<br />
21