Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education
Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education
Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
IN DEPTH:<br />
Absenteeism, Suspensions, Retention, and Dropping Out<br />
In this “in depth” view we focus on the impact of high absenteeism, discipline problems, and<br />
retention in grade, all of which have been well documented in the literature as key individual<br />
factors in dropping out. We compare the median attendance rate, the suspension rate, and<br />
the retention rate of high school students who dropped out and who remained in school in<br />
2009 (Table 30). We found that among LEP students who dropped out in SY2009, the median<br />
attendance was much lower (63.1%) than among those who stayed in school and that<br />
the difference in attendance rate between the two groups was statistically significant. Similarly,<br />
the suspension rate among those LEP students who dropped out was more than twice<br />
that of those LEP students who remained in school and this difference was also significant.<br />
Finally, we examine the rate of retention and found a higher proportion of students retained<br />
in grade among the dropouts than among those who did not drop out; this difference was<br />
also statistically significant. The situation of EP students mirrors that of LEP students.<br />
Table 30. Attendance, Suspension and Retention of High School Dropouts. BPS, SY2009<br />
EP LEP1 Dropped Out Did Not Drop Out Dropped Out Did not Drop Out<br />
Median Attendance Rate 56.8% 87.7% 63.1% 87.1%<br />
Suspension Rate 11.9% 6.6% 6.3% 3.0%<br />
Retention Rate 42.7% 8.8% 34.9% 19.8%<br />
Note: 1 The differences in attendance rates, suspension rates and retention rates between LEPs who dropped out and those<br />
who stayed in school were all found to be statistically significant (p= .000, p=.011 with minimal effect size, and p=.000 with<br />
minimal effect size, respectively).<br />
E What Are the Annual High School<br />
Dropout Rates of English Language<br />
Learners in Different Types of<br />
Schools and Programs?<br />
In this section we consider the differences in the<br />
dropout rates of LEP students in different types of<br />
schools and programs. The presentation of data<br />
is more limited than in other chapters, because<br />
the number of students is relatively small and they<br />
disaggregated across a relatively large number of<br />
programs and school characteristics. There<strong>for</strong>e, in<br />
some cases, we are unable to report findings <strong>for</strong><br />
reasons of confidentiality.<br />
Dropout Rates in Schools of Different Characteristics.<br />
We re-visit first the characteristics of<br />
schools presented earlier and present the dropout<br />
rates <strong>for</strong> LEP high school students at these schools.<br />
As a point of comparison we present the high<br />
school dropout rates <strong>for</strong> all BPS students and <strong>for</strong> all<br />
LEP students (Table 31).<br />
Differences in the poverty rate of schools, the<br />
density of their LEP student enrollment, attainment<br />
of AYP goals and the qualifications of their teachers<br />
were all statistically significant school characteristics<br />
in relation to the dropout rate of LEP high<br />
school students. The dropout rate among students<br />
in schools with a poverty rate between 25% and<br />
75% was almost three times that of schools with<br />
58 Improving <strong>Education</strong>al Outcomes of English Language Learners in Schools and Programs in Boston Public Schools