26.07.2013 Views

Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education

Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education

Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 10. Characteristics of LEP Students Changing Program Enrollment from in an ELL Program to<br />

Not in an ELL Program. BPS, SY2006-SY2007<br />

Total Making Change 2,536<br />

% Male 58.5%<br />

% Low Income 1 87.3%<br />

Native Language<br />

% Spanish 59.3%<br />

% Cape Verdean Creole 6.2%<br />

% Chinese languages 6.3%<br />

% Haitian Creole 8.1%<br />

% Portuguese 2.0%<br />

% Somali 1.8%<br />

% Vietnamese 6.3%<br />

% Other languages 9.9%<br />

English Language Proficiency 2<br />

% MEPA Level 1 5.1%<br />

% MEPA Level 2 13.6%<br />

% MEPA Level 3 38.5%<br />

% MEPA Level 4 42.8%<br />

% Mobile 3 6.1%<br />

% SWD 4 42.0%<br />

Note: Red indicates those characteristics where there is over-representation relative to the overall<br />

LEP population; 1 Percent eligible <strong>for</strong> free or reduced price lunch; 2 The Massachusetts English<br />

Proficiency Assessment is a test of English language proficiency in reading, writing, listening, and<br />

speaking required of all LEP students in Massachusetts. In SY2006, it provided results in 4 levels<br />

of per<strong>for</strong>mance (see Chapter VI <strong>for</strong> a fuller discussion of MEPA); 3 Percent of students who<br />

changed schools between October and June of a given school year; 4 Percent designated as a<br />

student with disabilities (SWD). Includes only students ages 6+ in K-12.<br />

almost recovered through new enrollments and<br />

changes in de-designation. But that year, the second<br />

decline took place when 2,536 LEP students in<br />

ELL programs were transferred into general education<br />

programs, causing ELL programs to, again, lose<br />

one-third of its students. In this change, general<br />

education programs grew while ELL programs<br />

declined.<br />

Table 10 shows characteristics of the students making<br />

the transfer away from programs <strong>for</strong> ELLs between<br />

SY2006 and SY2007. This transfer accounted<br />

<strong>for</strong> 91.0% of the total decline in LEP students in<br />

ELL programs observed in that period; the rest was<br />

due to transfers, dropouts, and graduations. Of<br />

the 2,536 students who transferred, 54.6% were in<br />

Grade 3 or lower. The largest proportion of the students<br />

who transferred (42.8%) were at the higher<br />

levels of English proficiency (Level 4) although close<br />

to 20% were at MEPA Levels 1 and 2 (Table 10). 7<br />

Of the LEP students transferred out of ELL programs<br />

in SY2007, 42% were students who were designated<br />

as LEP-SWDs. Of the latter, the majority (93.4%)<br />

were students who were previously designated<br />

LEP-SWD and were attending ELL programs. Relative<br />

to the characteristics of the overall enrollment<br />

of ELLs in BPS, these transferring students show<br />

over-representation of males, of Spanish and Vietnamese<br />

speakers, of students at the highest MEPA<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance levels, and the proportion designated<br />

as SWDs.<br />

32 Improving <strong>Education</strong>al Outcomes of English Language Learners in Schools and Programs in Boston Public Schools

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!