Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education
Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education
Full Report - Center for Collaborative Education
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 10. Characteristics of LEP Students Changing Program Enrollment from in an ELL Program to<br />
Not in an ELL Program. BPS, SY2006-SY2007<br />
Total Making Change 2,536<br />
% Male 58.5%<br />
% Low Income 1 87.3%<br />
Native Language<br />
% Spanish 59.3%<br />
% Cape Verdean Creole 6.2%<br />
% Chinese languages 6.3%<br />
% Haitian Creole 8.1%<br />
% Portuguese 2.0%<br />
% Somali 1.8%<br />
% Vietnamese 6.3%<br />
% Other languages 9.9%<br />
English Language Proficiency 2<br />
% MEPA Level 1 5.1%<br />
% MEPA Level 2 13.6%<br />
% MEPA Level 3 38.5%<br />
% MEPA Level 4 42.8%<br />
% Mobile 3 6.1%<br />
% SWD 4 42.0%<br />
Note: Red indicates those characteristics where there is over-representation relative to the overall<br />
LEP population; 1 Percent eligible <strong>for</strong> free or reduced price lunch; 2 The Massachusetts English<br />
Proficiency Assessment is a test of English language proficiency in reading, writing, listening, and<br />
speaking required of all LEP students in Massachusetts. In SY2006, it provided results in 4 levels<br />
of per<strong>for</strong>mance (see Chapter VI <strong>for</strong> a fuller discussion of MEPA); 3 Percent of students who<br />
changed schools between October and June of a given school year; 4 Percent designated as a<br />
student with disabilities (SWD). Includes only students ages 6+ in K-12.<br />
almost recovered through new enrollments and<br />
changes in de-designation. But that year, the second<br />
decline took place when 2,536 LEP students in<br />
ELL programs were transferred into general education<br />
programs, causing ELL programs to, again, lose<br />
one-third of its students. In this change, general<br />
education programs grew while ELL programs<br />
declined.<br />
Table 10 shows characteristics of the students making<br />
the transfer away from programs <strong>for</strong> ELLs between<br />
SY2006 and SY2007. This transfer accounted<br />
<strong>for</strong> 91.0% of the total decline in LEP students in<br />
ELL programs observed in that period; the rest was<br />
due to transfers, dropouts, and graduations. Of<br />
the 2,536 students who transferred, 54.6% were in<br />
Grade 3 or lower. The largest proportion of the students<br />
who transferred (42.8%) were at the higher<br />
levels of English proficiency (Level 4) although close<br />
to 20% were at MEPA Levels 1 and 2 (Table 10). 7<br />
Of the LEP students transferred out of ELL programs<br />
in SY2007, 42% were students who were designated<br />
as LEP-SWDs. Of the latter, the majority (93.4%)<br />
were students who were previously designated<br />
LEP-SWD and were attending ELL programs. Relative<br />
to the characteristics of the overall enrollment<br />
of ELLs in BPS, these transferring students show<br />
over-representation of males, of Spanish and Vietnamese<br />
speakers, of students at the highest MEPA<br />
per<strong>for</strong>mance levels, and the proportion designated<br />
as SWDs.<br />
32 Improving <strong>Education</strong>al Outcomes of English Language Learners in Schools and Programs in Boston Public Schools