Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
stop sequences that remain to be discussed are ON lp and lk as well as sequences of nasal + fortis stop. Sequences of these types have a voiceless sonorant only in the Vemdalen and Hede dialects. 1 Thus, for the nasals we have pe ‘lamp,’ fe ‘fifth,’ veer ‘winter,’ bru ‘brown (neut.),’ be ‘the bench’ and bk ‘bench.’ The laterals are voiceless flaps, e.g. jpe ‘help’ and fk ‘people.’ Finally, Table 3–8 summarises the development of ON stops in the Härjedalen dialects as they are described by Reitan, and provides an overview of the way ON stops in different contexts are reflected in terms of voicing conditions. The conventions used in the table are explained in section 3.1 (cf. Table 3–1). 3.5.2 Arjeplog Wallström (1943) describes the dialect of Arjeplog in Northern Sweden. According to his description, a distinguishing mark of the dialect is its collection of preaspirated stops. In Wallström’s account, fortis stops are preaspirated if preceded by a long vowel, e.g. rehp ‘rope,’ søht ‘sweet’ and hk ‘leak.’ Preaspiration occurs more sporadically after short vowels and in his standardised phonetic transcription of the dialect only the preaspirations occurring after long vowels are transcribed. Also, according to Wallström’s description, all sonorants are voiceless before fortis stops. The voicelessness appears to be complete and not partial as in many other dialects. Wallström’s examples include vkn ‘which,’ vr ‘winter’ and bk ‘bench.’ In a recent study of the Arjeplog dialect (using data from the SWEDIA 2000 database; see Ch. 4, section 4.4.4), Stölten (2002) showed that the female speakers of the Arjeplog dialect had longer preaspirations than males. Using the same data, Wretling, Strangert and Schaeffler (2002) investigated the production of fortis stops in the 1 This is according to Reitan (1930:67). Westin (1897) says that voiceless nasals are found in the western part of Härjedalen, as well as Linsäll, which might indicate that voicelessness in nasals has receded in its spread during the 30 odd years that separate Westin’s and Reitan’s studies. Also, Reitan is convinced that voicelessness in sonorants in the dialects of Vemdalen and Hede is a recent phenomenon, and he remarks that he finds that it is particularly noticeable in young informants. However, as we have seen, voicelessness in nasals in the Vemdalen dialect was described by Westin more than 30 years earlier, which undermines Reitan’s claim (cf. Hansson, 1997:54). – 78 –
Arjeplog dialect. Their findings support Wallström’s analysis, and it seems that the dialect has kept its preaspiration patterns intact, unlike the Vemdalen dialect (cf. preceding section). Wretling et al. found that preaspirations in VC sequences were far longer than preaspirations in VC sequences. In VC sequences, durations were fairly evenly distributed between vowel, preaspiration and occlusion. On average, the vowel comprised 35% of the sequence, the preaspiration 34% and the occlusion 31%. The corresponding figures for VC sequences were 30%, 13% and 58%. Thus Wallström’s impression that preaspiration was much more prominent in VC sequences is borne out by instrumental analysis. There is reason to believe that preaspiration and voiceless sonorants in the Arjeplog dialect have come about through contact with the local Saami population. According to Wallström (1943:20), there were relatively few Swedish speakers living in Lappland until the beginning of the 19 th century. In 1799, there were 958 Saami living in the areas of Arjeplog and Arvidsjaur, and only 247 Swedish settlers. Wallström cites evidence (albeit somewhat anecdotal) that many or most of the Swedish settlers seem to have been fluent in Saami at that time. Since the settlement of Swedish speakers in the area is so recent, and since they had such close contact with the Saami language, which had preaspiration and voiceless sonorants, there is good reason to believe that these features have been passed from Saami to the Arjeplog dialect. 3.5.3 The Gräsö dialect Preaspiration in the Gräsö dialect was first noted by Manne Eriksson in his postscript notes to Schagerström’s (1949) description of the dialect in Gräsö (see map in Figure 3-6 in the following section). Eriksson divides the island into two main dialectal areas, Northern and Southern, each of which resembles the dialect directly opposite on the mainland. This reflects the fact that in earlier times communications within the island were more difficult than those across the strait to the mainland. 1 A road connecting the northern and southern parts of the island was not built until the end of the 19 th century. Eriksson also points out that there 1 Gräsö is approximately 4 km from east to west and 25 km from north to south, and is fairly densely forested. – 79 –
- Page 39 and 40: while clusters have developed into
- Page 41 and 42: ted as voiceless unaspirated or pos
- Page 43 and 44: y a middle-aged male speaker. In bo
- Page 45 and 46: ut this is not true of the “stand
- Page 47 and 48: 2.6 Auditory constraints and the ra
- Page 49 and 50: The second criticism of Bladon’s
- Page 51 and 52: in discharge rates in the auditory
- Page 53: number of languages that possess se
- Page 56 and 57: and Lappic (Finno-Ugric). It has be
- Page 58 and 59: For the sake of simplicity and luci
- Page 60 and 61: ‘apple,’ [vh] vatnið ‘the wa
- Page 62 and 63: Table 3-1. Reflexes of Old Norse st
- Page 64 and 65: In the Northern dialect, V is sligh
- Page 66 and 67: Pind’s experiments as well as the
- Page 68 and 69: In Area 2, where Tórshavn is situa
- Page 70 and 71: in VC syllables in their speech, ju
- Page 72 and 73: Table 3-4. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 74 and 75: long vowel followed by a preaspirat
- Page 76 and 77: grams), with the occasional aid of
- Page 78 and 79: quantity system instead of the ON f
- Page 80 and 81: ON flytja). There are no examples o
- Page 82 and 83: Table 3-7. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 84 and 85: whether she thinks that leaving out
- Page 86 and 87: (Hede, Linsäll and Sveg) as well a
- Page 88 and 89: (VC vs. VC). For two pairs (/tak/ v
- Page 92 and 93: do occur systematic linguistic diff
- Page 94 and 95: Gräsö Forsmark Valö S W E D E N
- Page 96 and 97: There are very few examples of clus
- Page 98 and 99: Kökar, in the Åboland archipelago
- Page 100 and 101: one hand, speakers have a tendency
- Page 102 and 103: ecent studies that corroborate thes
- Page 104 and 105: example, in a particular dialect, t
- Page 106 and 107: does not give her segmentation crit
- Page 108 and 109: Scotland and Ireland 1 [hphthk] 2 [
- Page 110 and 111: approximately 140-150 ms in VC syll
- Page 112 and 113: 1. South Saami (Southern & Ume Saam
- Page 114 and 115: 1987a), Estonian (Engstrand & Krull
- Page 116 and 117: Table 3-13. Reflexes of ON postvoca
- Page 118 and 119: and Tórshavn Faroese data were eli
- Page 120 and 121: ducing breathiness into the voice q
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 4-3. An example of a sequenc
- Page 124 and 125: 4.2 Central Standard Swedish (CSw)
- Page 126 and 127: very large, since postaspiration wa
- Page 128 and 129: Several spectrographic examples of
- Page 130 and 131: The data indicate that there is lit
- Page 132 and 133: produced and in 9 cases there were
- Page 134 and 135: To examine effects of syllable stru
- Page 136 and 137: preaspiration for lexically stresse
- Page 138 and 139: durations exceeding 120 ms, preaspi
Arjeplog dialect. Their f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs support Wallström’s analysis, <strong>and</strong> it<br />
seems that <strong>the</strong> dialect has kept its preaspiration patterns <strong>in</strong>tact, unlike <strong>the</strong><br />
Vemdalen dialect (cf. preced<strong>in</strong>g section). Wretl<strong>in</strong>g et al. found that<br />
preaspirations <strong>in</strong> VC sequences were far longer than preaspirations <strong>in</strong><br />
VC sequences. In VC sequences, durations were fairly evenly<br />
distributed between vowel, preaspiration <strong>and</strong> occlusion. On average, <strong>the</strong><br />
vowel comprised 35% of <strong>the</strong> sequence, <strong>the</strong> preaspiration 34% <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
occlusion 31%. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g figures for VC sequences were 30%,<br />
13% <strong>and</strong> 58%. Thus Wallström’s impression that preaspiration was much<br />
more prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong> VC sequences is borne out by <strong>in</strong>strumental analysis.<br />
There is reason to believe that preaspiration <strong>and</strong> voiceless sonorants<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Arjeplog dialect have come about through contact with <strong>the</strong> local<br />
Saami population. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Wallström (1943:20), <strong>the</strong>re were relatively<br />
few Swedish speakers liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Lappl<strong>and</strong> until <strong>the</strong> beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong><br />
19 th century. In 1799, <strong>the</strong>re were 958 Saami liv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> areas of Arjeplog<br />
<strong>and</strong> Arvidsjaur, <strong>and</strong> only 247 Swedish settlers. Wallström cites<br />
evidence (albeit somewhat anecdotal) that many or most of <strong>the</strong> Swedish<br />
settlers seem to have been fluent <strong>in</strong> Saami at that time. S<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> settlement<br />
of Swedish speakers <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> area is so recent, <strong>and</strong> s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>y had<br />
such close contact with <strong>the</strong> Saami language, which had preaspiration <strong>and</strong><br />
voiceless sonorants, <strong>the</strong>re is good reason to believe that <strong>the</strong>se features<br />
have been passed from Saami to <strong>the</strong> Arjeplog dialect.<br />
3.5.3 The Gräsö dialect<br />
<strong>Preaspiration</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gräsö dialect was first noted by Manne Eriksson<br />
<strong>in</strong> his postscript notes to Schagerström’s (1949) description of <strong>the</strong> dialect<br />
<strong>in</strong> Gräsö (see map <strong>in</strong> Figure 3-6 <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section). Eriksson<br />
divides <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>to two ma<strong>in</strong> dialectal areas, Nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> Sou<strong>the</strong>rn,<br />
each of which resembles <strong>the</strong> dialect directly opposite on <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>.<br />
This reflects <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>in</strong> earlier times communications with<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
isl<strong>and</strong> were more difficult than those across <strong>the</strong> strait to <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong>l<strong>and</strong>. 1 A<br />
road connect<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> nor<strong>the</strong>rn <strong>and</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn parts of <strong>the</strong> isl<strong>and</strong> was not<br />
built until <strong>the</strong> end of <strong>the</strong> 19 th century. Eriksson also po<strong>in</strong>ts out that <strong>the</strong>re<br />
1<br />
Gräsö is approximately 4 km from east to west <strong>and</strong> 25 km from north to south, <strong>and</strong> is<br />
fairly densely forested.<br />
– 79 –