Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Table 3–7. Reflexes of ON stops in the Vågå variety of the Gudbrandsdalen dialect in terms of voicing conditions. (Further explanation in text and discussion of Table 3–1.) ON examples 1 Gudbrandsd. tala ~ dala + mata = * átta ~ odda vanta ~ vanda (mn) = hjalpa (lr+pk) = * elta ~ elda (lr) epli (pk+rl) = vatna (nlr) * keypti (pt and pn only) fricative vaxa (x only) /= 3.4.3 Trønder Norwegian Moxness (1997) investigated the occurrence of preaspiration in the Trønder variety of Norwegian, spoken in the Trøndelag region, which stretches to the north and south of the city of Trondheim (see map, Figure 1–1). Having noted (unexpectedly) that Trønder speakers tended to preaspirate their fortis stops, Moxness set out to quantify Trønder preaspiration. She used 10 speakers of the Trønder dialect, 5 male and 5 female. As test words, she used 18 monosyllabic and 18 disyllabic (mostly nonsense) words. For each group, she had 9 words with CVC(V) structure and 9 words with a CVC(V) structure, testing 3 vowels (/i/, /a/ and /u/) and three medial stops (/p/, /t/ and /k/). The initial consonant was always /p/. The resulting test words thus included (mostly nonsense) words such as: /pip/, /puta/, /pat/ and /pika/. A total of 2,160 tokens were produced. Although not stated specifically, it seems that the words were produced in isolation (i.e., not in a frame sentence). 1 Glossary: tala ‘to speak,’ dala ‘valleys (gen.),’ mata ‘to feed,’ átta ‘eight,’ odda ‘points (obl.),’ vanta ‘to need,’ vanda ‘problem (obl.),’ hjalpa ‘help,’ elta ‘to chase,’ elda ‘fires (gen.),’ epli ‘apple,’ vatna ‘waters, lakes (gen.),’ keypti ‘bought,’ vaxa ‘to grow.’ – 70 –
According to the segmentation criteria set up by Moxness (ibid:14), preaspiration is the “interval from the offset of periodicity to the end of friction/beginning of the complete closure for C2 [i.e., the stop].” However, from the individual examples discussed one must infer that complete aperiodicity was not a criterion for marking the onset of preaspiration. Thus it is not clear to which extent the period of breathy voice before the onset of voiceless aspiration is included in Moxness’s measurements of preaspiration duration. Moxness’s findings show that speakers of the Trønder dialect do tend to preaspirate, and as in the case of most other Nordic languages, the preaspirations are longer in VC than in VC syllables. For all speakers pooled, the mean duration of preaspiration in VC syllables was 23.9 ms, whereas in VC syllables it was 15.0 ms. A considerable gender difference was observed in the degree of differentiation between syllable types with regard to preaspiration. For the males, mean preaspiration duration in VC syllables was 22.4 ms, and 18.3 in VC syllables. The corresponding figures for the females were 25.4 ms and 11.5 ms. Thus the females seem to use preaspiration as a correlate of stops in VC syllables to a much greater degree than in VC syllables, whereas the males make far less of a distinction between syllable types. Comparable gender differences in durational differentiation have been observed by, e.g., Wassink (1999), Ericsdotter & Ericsson (2001), and Simpson (2001, 2002). The preaspiration durations cited above also reveal that mean preaspiration in VC syllables for females is 3 ms longer than for males. Although small (and probably imperceptible), this difference is significant at p
- Page 31 and 32: The similarity in gestural organisa
- Page 33 and 34: The fact that both preaspiration an
- Page 35 and 36: have normative preaspiration, other
- Page 37 and 38: usually expressed as unaspirated an
- Page 39 and 40: while clusters have developed into
- Page 41 and 42: ted as voiceless unaspirated or pos
- Page 43 and 44: y a middle-aged male speaker. In bo
- Page 45 and 46: ut this is not true of the “stand
- Page 47 and 48: 2.6 Auditory constraints and the ra
- Page 49 and 50: The second criticism of Bladon’s
- Page 51 and 52: in discharge rates in the auditory
- Page 53: number of languages that possess se
- Page 56 and 57: and Lappic (Finno-Ugric). It has be
- Page 58 and 59: For the sake of simplicity and luci
- Page 60 and 61: ‘apple,’ [vh] vatnið ‘the wa
- Page 62 and 63: Table 3-1. Reflexes of Old Norse st
- Page 64 and 65: In the Northern dialect, V is sligh
- Page 66 and 67: Pind’s experiments as well as the
- Page 68 and 69: In Area 2, where Tórshavn is situa
- Page 70 and 71: in VC syllables in their speech, ju
- Page 72 and 73: Table 3-4. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 74 and 75: long vowel followed by a preaspirat
- Page 76 and 77: grams), with the occasional aid of
- Page 78 and 79: quantity system instead of the ON f
- Page 80 and 81: ON flytja). There are no examples o
- Page 84 and 85: whether she thinks that leaving out
- Page 86 and 87: (Hede, Linsäll and Sveg) as well a
- Page 88 and 89: (VC vs. VC). For two pairs (/tak/ v
- Page 90 and 91: stop sequences that remain to be di
- Page 92 and 93: do occur systematic linguistic diff
- Page 94 and 95: Gräsö Forsmark Valö S W E D E N
- Page 96 and 97: There are very few examples of clus
- Page 98 and 99: Kökar, in the Åboland archipelago
- Page 100 and 101: one hand, speakers have a tendency
- Page 102 and 103: ecent studies that corroborate thes
- Page 104 and 105: example, in a particular dialect, t
- Page 106 and 107: does not give her segmentation crit
- Page 108 and 109: Scotland and Ireland 1 [hphthk] 2 [
- Page 110 and 111: approximately 140-150 ms in VC syll
- Page 112 and 113: 1. South Saami (Southern & Ume Saam
- Page 114 and 115: 1987a), Estonian (Engstrand & Krull
- Page 116 and 117: Table 3-13. Reflexes of ON postvoca
- Page 118 and 119: and Tórshavn Faroese data were eli
- Page 120 and 121: ducing breathiness into the voice q
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 4-3. An example of a sequenc
- Page 124 and 125: 4.2 Central Standard Swedish (CSw)
- Page 126 and 127: very large, since postaspiration wa
- Page 128 and 129: Several spectrographic examples of
- Page 130 and 131: The data indicate that there is lit
Accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>the</strong> segmentation criteria set up by Moxness (ibid:14),<br />
preaspiration is <strong>the</strong> “<strong>in</strong>terval from <strong>the</strong> offset of periodicity to <strong>the</strong> end of<br />
friction/beg<strong>in</strong>n<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> complete closure for C2 [i.e., <strong>the</strong> stop].”<br />
However, from <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividual examples discussed one must <strong>in</strong>fer that<br />
complete aperiodicity was not a criterion for mark<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> onset of preaspiration.<br />
Thus it is not clear to which extent <strong>the</strong> period of breathy voice<br />
before <strong>the</strong> onset of voiceless aspiration is <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Moxness’s<br />
measurements of preaspiration duration.<br />
Moxness’s f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show that speakers of <strong>the</strong> Trønder dialect do<br />
tend to preaspirate, <strong>and</strong> as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> case of most o<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Nordic</strong> languages,<br />
<strong>the</strong> preaspirations are longer <strong>in</strong> VC than <strong>in</strong> VC syllables. For all speakers<br />
pooled, <strong>the</strong> mean duration of preaspiration <strong>in</strong> VC syllables was<br />
23.9 ms, whereas <strong>in</strong> VC syllables it was 15.0 ms. A considerable gender<br />
difference was observed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> degree of differentiation between syllable<br />
types with regard to preaspiration. For <strong>the</strong> males, mean preaspiration<br />
duration <strong>in</strong> VC syllables was 22.4 ms, <strong>and</strong> 18.3 <strong>in</strong> VC syllables. The<br />
correspond<strong>in</strong>g figures for <strong>the</strong> females were 25.4 ms <strong>and</strong> 11.5 ms. Thus<br />
<strong>the</strong> females seem to use preaspiration as a correlate of stops <strong>in</strong> VC syllables<br />
to a much greater degree than <strong>in</strong> VC syllables, whereas <strong>the</strong> males<br />
make far less of a dist<strong>in</strong>ction between syllable types. Comparable gender<br />
differences <strong>in</strong> durational differentiation have been observed by, e.g.,<br />
Wass<strong>in</strong>k (1999), Ericsdotter & Ericsson (2001), <strong>and</strong> Simpson (2001,<br />
2002).<br />
The preaspiration durations cited above also reveal that mean<br />
preaspiration <strong>in</strong> VC syllables for females is 3 ms longer than for males.<br />
Although small (<strong>and</strong> probably imperceptible), this difference is significant<br />
at p