Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

ON flytja). There are no examples of tt, kk + j clusters. It is very probable, however, that these clusters have developed in the same way as have stops preceding close front vowels, which according to Ross are produced as [hç], e.g. bhçinthe hill.’ There are three examples of k(k)r clusters. Two have preaspiration, vhkrs ‘most beautiful’ and øhkr ‘your (pl.)’ The third example has no preaspiration, kr ‘fields’ (the dative form, kre, is also cited). Similarly, there is one example of a k(k)l cluster with preaspiration, hk ‘ankle,’ 1 and one without preaspiration, yk ‘keys.’ The word pe ‘apple,’ without preaspiration, is the only example of a p(p)l cluster. As for t(t)l clusters, Ross states that these are reflected as [] or [] 2 , but he provides no examples. From these meagre data we can tentatively infer that for k(k) + r, l clusters, a distinction is made between preaspirated and unaspirated variants—note that it is also possible to have a voiced stop in such clusters, as inthe nails.’ However, it is difficult to infer from these examples whether they reflect the ON distinction between singleton and geminate stops. ON t(t)n, k(k)n clusters are invariably reflected as preaspirated, as in vh ‘the water,’ kvehk ‘come to life’ and rhe ‘rotten (pl.)’ ON pn, however, is usually reflected as [f], e.g. f ‘to open,’ and sometimes as unaspirated [p], e.g. p. ON pt yields [f], e.g. øf ‘bought,’ but ON kt yields [hk], e.g. yhk ‘thought.’ The evidence for preaspiration in ON ks clusters is problematic, since the examples variably have preaspirated and unaspirated stops. Thus we have, for example, vkse ‘grow’ and voks ‘grew’ as well as vhkse and vohks. Taken at face value, this suggests that in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects, preaspiration on such clusters is non-normative. We turn now to voicelessness in sonorants before ON p, t, k. Judging from the examples and comments provided by Ross and Hesselman, the nasal in ON sequences of nasal + p, t, k is invariably reflected as voiced 1 One would expect a flap here, instead of the alveolar lateral, i.e. [hk]. In the original, a flap is denoted with a and an alveolar lateral as a , so this may simply be an oversight. 2 He transcribes these as and , which I interpret as a voiceless alveolar lateral approximant and a voiceless palatal lateral approximant respectively. – 68 –

in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects, as in vir 1 ‘the winter’ and ç ‘to think.’ However, one should keep in mind that these words are unlikely to be direct developments from ON, since most sequences of nasal + stop develop into a long stop in the western dialects of ON (i.e., mp > pp; nt > tt; nk > kk). ON l before p, k is reflected as a voiced flap, e.g. fkm ‘people (dat. pl.)’ and jp ‘to help.’ However, ON lt sequences are reflected as [], e.g. v ‘to fall over, capsize,’ ‘all, everything’ and m ‘old.’ Regarding r before p, t, k, things are less clear. ON rk sequences seem to have a voiced r-sound, e.g. çrun ‘the church’ and mrçe ‘fields,’ although one also finds mh ‘market’ (< ON marknaðr) 2 . As for ON rt, Ross has many examples of both [h] and [], e.g. h ‘heard,’ jo ‘done,’ vh ‘became’ and svh ‘black.’ We also find both jh and j ‘heart,’ as well as oj ‘kind-hearted.’ As with ks clusters, this may suggest that the presence of voiceless sonorants in such sequences is non-normative. The ON lenis stops, b, d, g, (which only occurred in geminates and in clusters) generally seem to be reflected as voiced in intervocalic position in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects. This goes for geminates as well as the simple lenis stops that originate in ON word-medial voiced fricatives. However, Hesselman (1905:11) remarks that in word-final position the lenis stops are voiceless. 3 Since he gives no specific examples, it is not clear what this implies. Possibly, his comment should be interpreted as meaning “utterance-finally and before voiceless consonants.” Otherwise, one has to assume that, for example, a sequence like född i ‘born in’ has a voiceless stop, while the sequence födde ‘bore child’ has a voiced one. To summarise the development of ON stops in the Gudbrandsdalen dialect, Table 3–7 provides an overview of the way ON stops in different contexts are reflected in terms of voicing conditions. For an explanation of the conventions used in this table, cf. section 3.1 (Table 3–1). 1 Keep in mind that these transcriptions are translated as faithfully as possible from the original representation. The seemingly strange transcription r simply represents the sequence rn in the original. 2 Possibly ON marknaðr > Gudbr. *martna, which should turn out as [mhn]. 3 His exact words are: “‘bp, dt, gk’ i slutljud finnes också i […] Gudbrandsdalen […]” – 69 –

ON flytja). There are no examples of tt, kk + j clusters. It is very probable,<br />

however, that <strong>the</strong>se clusters have developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way as<br />

have stops preced<strong>in</strong>g close front vowels, which accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ross are<br />

produced as [hç], e.g. bhç<strong>in</strong> ‘<strong>the</strong> hill.’<br />

There are three examples of k(k)r clusters. Two have preaspiration,<br />

vhkrs ‘most beautiful’ <strong>and</strong> øhkr ‘your (pl.)’ The third example<br />

has no preaspiration, kr ‘fields’ (<strong>the</strong> dative form, kre, is<br />

also cited). Similarly, <strong>the</strong>re is one example of a k(k)l cluster with preaspiration,<br />

hk ‘ankle,’ 1 <strong>and</strong> one without preaspiration, yk ‘keys.’<br />

The word pe ‘apple,’ without preaspiration, is <strong>the</strong> only example of a<br />

p(p)l cluster. As for t(t)l clusters, Ross states that <strong>the</strong>se are reflected as []<br />

or [] 2 , but he provides no examples. From <strong>the</strong>se meagre data we can<br />

tentatively <strong>in</strong>fer that for k(k) + r, l clusters, a dist<strong>in</strong>ction is made between<br />

preaspirated <strong>and</strong> unaspirated variants—note that it is also possible to<br />

have a voiced stop <strong>in</strong> such clusters, as <strong>in</strong> ‘<strong>the</strong> nails.’ However,<br />

it is difficult to <strong>in</strong>fer from <strong>the</strong>se examples whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y reflect <strong>the</strong> ON<br />

dist<strong>in</strong>ction between s<strong>in</strong>gleton <strong>and</strong> gem<strong>in</strong>ate stops.<br />

ON t(t)n, k(k)n clusters are <strong>in</strong>variably reflected as preaspirated, as <strong>in</strong><br />

vh ‘<strong>the</strong> water,’ kvehk ‘come to life’ <strong>and</strong> rhe ‘rotten<br />

(pl.)’ ON pn, however, is usually reflected as [f], e.g. f ‘to<br />

open,’ <strong>and</strong> sometimes as unaspirated [p], e.g. p.<br />

ON pt yields [f], e.g. øf ‘bought,’ but ON kt yields [hk], e.g.<br />

yhk ‘thought.’ The evidence for preaspiration <strong>in</strong> ON ks clusters is<br />

problematic, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> examples variably have preaspirated <strong>and</strong> unaspirated<br />

stops. Thus we have, for example, vkse ‘grow’ <strong>and</strong> voks<br />

‘grew’ as well as vhkse <strong>and</strong> vohks. Taken at face value, this suggests<br />

that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gudbr<strong>and</strong>sdalen dialects, preaspiration on such clusters<br />

is non-normative.<br />

We turn now to voicelessness <strong>in</strong> sonorants before ON p, t, k. Judg<strong>in</strong>g<br />

from <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>and</strong> comments provided by Ross <strong>and</strong> Hesselman, <strong>the</strong><br />

nasal <strong>in</strong> ON sequences of nasal + p, t, k is <strong>in</strong>variably reflected as voiced<br />

1 One would expect a flap here, <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>the</strong> alveolar lateral, i.e. [hk]. In <strong>the</strong><br />

orig<strong>in</strong>al, a flap is denoted with a <strong>and</strong> an alveolar lateral as a , so this may simply be<br />

an oversight.<br />

2 He transcribes <strong>the</strong>se as <strong>and</strong> , which I <strong>in</strong>terpret as a voiceless alveolar lateral<br />

approximant <strong>and</strong> a voiceless palatal lateral approximant respectively.<br />

– 68 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!