Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
ON flytja). There are no examples of tt, kk + j clusters. It is very probable, however, that these clusters have developed in the same way as have stops preceding close front vowels, which according to Ross are produced as [hç], e.g. bhçin ‘the hill.’ There are three examples of k(k)r clusters. Two have preaspiration, vhkrs ‘most beautiful’ and øhkr ‘your (pl.)’ The third example has no preaspiration, kr ‘fields’ (the dative form, kre, is also cited). Similarly, there is one example of a k(k)l cluster with preaspiration, hk ‘ankle,’ 1 and one without preaspiration, yk ‘keys.’ The word pe ‘apple,’ without preaspiration, is the only example of a p(p)l cluster. As for t(t)l clusters, Ross states that these are reflected as [] or [] 2 , but he provides no examples. From these meagre data we can tentatively infer that for k(k) + r, l clusters, a distinction is made between preaspirated and unaspirated variants—note that it is also possible to have a voiced stop in such clusters, as in ‘the nails.’ However, it is difficult to infer from these examples whether they reflect the ON distinction between singleton and geminate stops. ON t(t)n, k(k)n clusters are invariably reflected as preaspirated, as in vh ‘the water,’ kvehk ‘come to life’ and rhe ‘rotten (pl.)’ ON pn, however, is usually reflected as [f], e.g. f ‘to open,’ and sometimes as unaspirated [p], e.g. p. ON pt yields [f], e.g. øf ‘bought,’ but ON kt yields [hk], e.g. yhk ‘thought.’ The evidence for preaspiration in ON ks clusters is problematic, since the examples variably have preaspirated and unaspirated stops. Thus we have, for example, vkse ‘grow’ and voks ‘grew’ as well as vhkse and vohks. Taken at face value, this suggests that in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects, preaspiration on such clusters is non-normative. We turn now to voicelessness in sonorants before ON p, t, k. Judging from the examples and comments provided by Ross and Hesselman, the nasal in ON sequences of nasal + p, t, k is invariably reflected as voiced 1 One would expect a flap here, instead of the alveolar lateral, i.e. [hk]. In the original, a flap is denoted with a and an alveolar lateral as a , so this may simply be an oversight. 2 He transcribes these as and , which I interpret as a voiceless alveolar lateral approximant and a voiceless palatal lateral approximant respectively. – 68 –
in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects, as in vir 1 ‘the winter’ and ç ‘to think.’ However, one should keep in mind that these words are unlikely to be direct developments from ON, since most sequences of nasal + stop develop into a long stop in the western dialects of ON (i.e., mp > pp; nt > tt; nk > kk). ON l before p, k is reflected as a voiced flap, e.g. fkm ‘people (dat. pl.)’ and jp ‘to help.’ However, ON lt sequences are reflected as [], e.g. v ‘to fall over, capsize,’ ‘all, everything’ and m ‘old.’ Regarding r before p, t, k, things are less clear. ON rk sequences seem to have a voiced r-sound, e.g. çrun ‘the church’ and mrçe ‘fields,’ although one also finds mh ‘market’ (< ON marknaðr) 2 . As for ON rt, Ross has many examples of both [h] and [], e.g. h ‘heard,’ jo ‘done,’ vh ‘became’ and svh ‘black.’ We also find both jh and j ‘heart,’ as well as oj ‘kind-hearted.’ As with ks clusters, this may suggest that the presence of voiceless sonorants in such sequences is non-normative. The ON lenis stops, b, d, g, (which only occurred in geminates and in clusters) generally seem to be reflected as voiced in intervocalic position in the Gudbrandsdalen dialects. This goes for geminates as well as the simple lenis stops that originate in ON word-medial voiced fricatives. However, Hesselman (1905:11) remarks that in word-final position the lenis stops are voiceless. 3 Since he gives no specific examples, it is not clear what this implies. Possibly, his comment should be interpreted as meaning “utterance-finally and before voiceless consonants.” Otherwise, one has to assume that, for example, a sequence like född i ‘born in’ has a voiceless stop, while the sequence födde ‘bore child’ has a voiced one. To summarise the development of ON stops in the Gudbrandsdalen dialect, Table 3–7 provides an overview of the way ON stops in different contexts are reflected in terms of voicing conditions. For an explanation of the conventions used in this table, cf. section 3.1 (Table 3–1). 1 Keep in mind that these transcriptions are translated as faithfully as possible from the original representation. The seemingly strange transcription r simply represents the sequence rn in the original. 2 Possibly ON marknaðr > Gudbr. *martna, which should turn out as [mhn]. 3 His exact words are: “‘bp, dt, gk’ i slutljud finnes också i […] Gudbrandsdalen […]” – 69 –
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2 Linking preaspiration and sonor
- Page 31 and 32: The similarity in gestural organisa
- Page 33 and 34: The fact that both preaspiration an
- Page 35 and 36: have normative preaspiration, other
- Page 37 and 38: usually expressed as unaspirated an
- Page 39 and 40: while clusters have developed into
- Page 41 and 42: ted as voiceless unaspirated or pos
- Page 43 and 44: y a middle-aged male speaker. In bo
- Page 45 and 46: ut this is not true of the “stand
- Page 47 and 48: 2.6 Auditory constraints and the ra
- Page 49 and 50: The second criticism of Bladon’s
- Page 51 and 52: in discharge rates in the auditory
- Page 53: number of languages that possess se
- Page 56 and 57: and Lappic (Finno-Ugric). It has be
- Page 58 and 59: For the sake of simplicity and luci
- Page 60 and 61: ‘apple,’ [vh] vatnið ‘the wa
- Page 62 and 63: Table 3-1. Reflexes of Old Norse st
- Page 64 and 65: In the Northern dialect, V is sligh
- Page 66 and 67: Pind’s experiments as well as the
- Page 68 and 69: In Area 2, where Tórshavn is situa
- Page 70 and 71: in VC syllables in their speech, ju
- Page 72 and 73: Table 3-4. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 74 and 75: long vowel followed by a preaspirat
- Page 76 and 77: grams), with the occasional aid of
- Page 78 and 79: quantity system instead of the ON f
- Page 82 and 83: Table 3-7. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 84 and 85: whether she thinks that leaving out
- Page 86 and 87: (Hede, Linsäll and Sveg) as well a
- Page 88 and 89: (VC vs. VC). For two pairs (/tak/ v
- Page 90 and 91: stop sequences that remain to be di
- Page 92 and 93: do occur systematic linguistic diff
- Page 94 and 95: Gräsö Forsmark Valö S W E D E N
- Page 96 and 97: There are very few examples of clus
- Page 98 and 99: Kökar, in the Åboland archipelago
- Page 100 and 101: one hand, speakers have a tendency
- Page 102 and 103: ecent studies that corroborate thes
- Page 104 and 105: example, in a particular dialect, t
- Page 106 and 107: does not give her segmentation crit
- Page 108 and 109: Scotland and Ireland 1 [hphthk] 2 [
- Page 110 and 111: approximately 140-150 ms in VC syll
- Page 112 and 113: 1. South Saami (Southern & Ume Saam
- Page 114 and 115: 1987a), Estonian (Engstrand & Krull
- Page 116 and 117: Table 3-13. Reflexes of ON postvoca
- Page 118 and 119: and Tórshavn Faroese data were eli
- Page 120 and 121: ducing breathiness into the voice q
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 4-3. An example of a sequenc
- Page 124 and 125: 4.2 Central Standard Swedish (CSw)
- Page 126 and 127: very large, since postaspiration wa
- Page 128 and 129: Several spectrographic examples of
ON flytja). There are no examples of tt, kk + j clusters. It is very probable,<br />
however, that <strong>the</strong>se clusters have developed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way as<br />
have stops preced<strong>in</strong>g close front vowels, which accord<strong>in</strong>g to Ross are<br />
produced as [hç], e.g. bhç<strong>in</strong> ‘<strong>the</strong> hill.’<br />
There are three examples of k(k)r clusters. Two have preaspiration,<br />
vhkrs ‘most beautiful’ <strong>and</strong> øhkr ‘your (pl.)’ The third example<br />
has no preaspiration, kr ‘fields’ (<strong>the</strong> dative form, kre, is<br />
also cited). Similarly, <strong>the</strong>re is one example of a k(k)l cluster with preaspiration,<br />
hk ‘ankle,’ 1 <strong>and</strong> one without preaspiration, yk ‘keys.’<br />
The word pe ‘apple,’ without preaspiration, is <strong>the</strong> only example of a<br />
p(p)l cluster. As for t(t)l clusters, Ross states that <strong>the</strong>se are reflected as []<br />
or [] 2 , but he provides no examples. From <strong>the</strong>se meagre data we can<br />
tentatively <strong>in</strong>fer that for k(k) + r, l clusters, a dist<strong>in</strong>ction is made between<br />
preaspirated <strong>and</strong> unaspirated variants—note that it is also possible to<br />
have a voiced stop <strong>in</strong> such clusters, as <strong>in</strong> ‘<strong>the</strong> nails.’ However,<br />
it is difficult to <strong>in</strong>fer from <strong>the</strong>se examples whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y reflect <strong>the</strong> ON<br />
dist<strong>in</strong>ction between s<strong>in</strong>gleton <strong>and</strong> gem<strong>in</strong>ate stops.<br />
ON t(t)n, k(k)n clusters are <strong>in</strong>variably reflected as preaspirated, as <strong>in</strong><br />
vh ‘<strong>the</strong> water,’ kvehk ‘come to life’ <strong>and</strong> rhe ‘rotten<br />
(pl.)’ ON pn, however, is usually reflected as [f], e.g. f ‘to<br />
open,’ <strong>and</strong> sometimes as unaspirated [p], e.g. p.<br />
ON pt yields [f], e.g. øf ‘bought,’ but ON kt yields [hk], e.g.<br />
yhk ‘thought.’ The evidence for preaspiration <strong>in</strong> ON ks clusters is<br />
problematic, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong> examples variably have preaspirated <strong>and</strong> unaspirated<br />
stops. Thus we have, for example, vkse ‘grow’ <strong>and</strong> voks<br />
‘grew’ as well as vhkse <strong>and</strong> vohks. Taken at face value, this suggests<br />
that <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Gudbr<strong>and</strong>sdalen dialects, preaspiration on such clusters<br />
is non-normative.<br />
We turn now to voicelessness <strong>in</strong> sonorants before ON p, t, k. Judg<strong>in</strong>g<br />
from <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>and</strong> comments provided by Ross <strong>and</strong> Hesselman, <strong>the</strong><br />
nasal <strong>in</strong> ON sequences of nasal + p, t, k is <strong>in</strong>variably reflected as voiced<br />
1 One would expect a flap here, <strong>in</strong>stead of <strong>the</strong> alveolar lateral, i.e. [hk]. In <strong>the</strong><br />
orig<strong>in</strong>al, a flap is denoted with a <strong>and</strong> an alveolar lateral as a , so this may simply be<br />
an oversight.<br />
2 He transcribes <strong>the</strong>se as <strong>and</strong> , which I <strong>in</strong>terpret as a voiceless alveolar lateral<br />
approximant <strong>and</strong> a voiceless palatal lateral approximant respectively.<br />
– 68 –