Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
‘apple,’ [vh] vatnið ‘<strong>the</strong> water’ <strong>and</strong> [œhkl] ökkli ‘ankle.’ The<br />
clusters pt <strong>and</strong> kt as well as ppt <strong>and</strong> kkt are reflected as sequences of a<br />
voiceless fricative <strong>and</strong> a stop, e.g. [sf] sleppti ‘released’ <strong>and</strong><br />
[vx] vakta ‘to guard.’ However, tk clusters have nei<strong>the</strong>r a fricative<br />
nor preaspiration, but are <strong>in</strong>stead voiceless <strong>and</strong> unaspirated, e.g.<br />
[vks] vitkast ‘become wiser.’ 1<br />
F<strong>in</strong>ally, ON homomorphemic p, t + s <strong>and</strong> x are generally reflected as<br />
sequences of fricative + [s], e.g. [fs] upsir ‘eaves,’ [pls] blessa<br />
‘bless’ <strong>and</strong> [lxs] laxar ‘salmons.’ 2 For x, though, <strong>the</strong>re is an ongo<strong>in</strong>g<br />
trend towards produc<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong>se as [ks] sequences, e.g. [lks] (cf.<br />
Þrá<strong>in</strong>sson & Árnason, 1992). Across a morpheme boundary, e.g. when<br />
attach<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> genitive -s to a noun, <strong>the</strong> general rule is that <strong>the</strong> -s is added<br />
to <strong>the</strong> stem form without affect<strong>in</strong>g it. Thus we get, for example, [hps]<br />
hrapps as <strong>the</strong> genitive of [hp] hrappur ‘scoundrel,’ [ms] mats<br />
from [m] mat ‘estimate’ <strong>and</strong> [lks] laks from [lk] lak ‘bed sheet.’<br />
However, one sometimes hears that <strong>the</strong> vowel <strong>in</strong> such genitives gets<br />
shortened, but <strong>the</strong> stop rema<strong>in</strong>s unaspirated. For [sp] skip ‘ship,’ for<br />
example, <strong>the</strong> genitive can be both [sps] <strong>and</strong> [sps] (<strong>and</strong> actually<br />
even [sfs]). The form **[shps] is not allowed, however.<br />
ON bb, dd, gg are predom<strong>in</strong>antly reflected as voiceless unaspirated,<br />
as <strong>in</strong> [lp] labba ‘walk,’ [vi] vídd ‘width,’ [sk] skuggi ‘shadow,’<br />
<strong>and</strong> [k] rugga ‘to rock.’ Modern Icel<strong>and</strong>ic also has clusters with<br />
lenis stops as <strong>the</strong> first elements, e.g. [npl] nafli ‘navel,’ [f] fellur<br />
‘falls’ <strong>and</strong> [kl] rugla ‘to confuse.’ 3<br />
From <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g discussion we see that <strong>the</strong> presence of preaspiration<br />
on stops <strong>in</strong> postvocalic position before voiced segments goes h<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
h<strong>and</strong> with <strong>the</strong> length of <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g vowel. Preaspirated stops can<br />
1 As Hansson (1997:36) po<strong>in</strong>ts out, such clusters are sometimes produced with<br />
preaspiration, <strong>and</strong> it is not uncommon to hear, for example, [nhkn] notkun ‘use<br />
(noun).’<br />
2 Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>se sequences actually had stops <strong>in</strong> ON is uncerta<strong>in</strong>. Possibly, x <strong>in</strong> words<br />
like lax ‘salmon’ was produced as [xs] while ks <strong>in</strong> þaks ‘roof (gen.)’ (where <strong>the</strong> -s is a<br />
genitive marker, <strong>and</strong> k <strong>and</strong> s thus heteromorphemic) was produced as [ks].<br />
3 In ON, lenis stops seldom preceded r, j, v, l, n. Genitive plural forms of adjectives are<br />
a potential source for such sequences, e.g. tryggra, ‘loyal’ <strong>and</strong> hræddra ‘scared.’<br />
O<strong>the</strong>r examples <strong>in</strong>clude words such as hggva ‘hew,’ <strong>and</strong>, perhaps, uggla ‘owl.’<br />
– 48 –