26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

suited for communicative purposes. This, he claims, is reflected <strong>in</strong><br />

UPSID, <strong>in</strong> which “from <strong>the</strong> 317 languages […] preaspiration is attested<br />

<strong>in</strong> only 2 or 3.” 1<br />

Bladon’s account is conv<strong>in</strong>c<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> has <strong>in</strong>tuitive appeal for those<br />

that feel, as I do, that preaspiration is a fairly unobtrusive phonetic feature<br />

that tends to escape detection. However, his claims should not be<br />

viewed uncritically, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re are problems with his approach.<br />

First, Bladon relies on UPSID for <strong>in</strong>formation on <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />

occurrence of <strong>the</strong> sound pattern [h] + stop (i.e. pre-occlusive aspirations).<br />

As was discussed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section, a problem with UPSID is its<br />

possible underestimation of <strong>the</strong> frequency of preaspiration occurrence. A<br />

more serious problem is <strong>the</strong> fact that UPSID does not conta<strong>in</strong> any <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

regard<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency of occurrence of hC clusters. 2 The auditory<br />

constra<strong>in</strong>ts Bladon proposes should apply to any VhC sequence, not<br />

only to sequences <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong> h-sound happens to get classified as preaspiration<br />

(cf. discussion <strong>in</strong> section 2.1). It is <strong>in</strong> this way that <strong>the</strong> frequency<br />

of occurrence of pre-occlusive aspirations—i.e., h-sounds <strong>in</strong> hC<br />

clusters <strong>and</strong> preaspirations—is underestimated (see also Hansson (1997:9).<br />

For comparison, consider if one were <strong>in</strong>vestigat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> frequency of<br />

occurrence of pre- <strong>and</strong> post-affricated [t], e.g., [t] <strong>and</strong> [t]. UPSID tells<br />

us that 41% of languages have [t], but no pre-affricated stop [t] whatsoever<br />

is found—it is not even part of <strong>the</strong> UPSID segment <strong>in</strong>ventory. We<br />

cannot conclude from this that <strong>the</strong> sequence [t] is auditorily <strong>in</strong>ept. The<br />

reason why [t] does not show up <strong>in</strong> UPSID is not that it does not occur<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> languages of <strong>the</strong> world, but ra<strong>the</strong>r that when it does occur, l<strong>in</strong>guists<br />

seem to analyse it as a cluster <strong>in</strong>stead of a pre-affricate “segment.”<br />

1 Bladon used a version of <strong>the</strong> UPSID database that conta<strong>in</strong>ed phonological <strong>in</strong>ventories<br />

from 317 languages (cf. Maddieson 1984). In <strong>the</strong> updated UPSID (Maddieson &<br />

Precoda 1989), which has <strong>in</strong>ventories from 451 languages, only one language has<br />

preaspiration.<br />

2 It is difficult to obta<strong>in</strong> reliable estimates on how many languages allow hC clusters.<br />

The ones I am aware of <strong>in</strong>clude F<strong>in</strong>nish, Menom<strong>in</strong>i, Taba, some varieties of Spanish<br />

(esp. American), Arabic (as well as many languages that have borrowed from Arabic,<br />

e.g. Urdu, Persian <strong>and</strong> Turkish), many of <strong>the</strong> Algonquian languages, Comanche <strong>and</strong><br />

Mono, as well as some Oto-Manguean languages. This list is hardly exhaustive. My<br />

hunch is that <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>in</strong> which pre-occlusive aspirations are most appropriately<br />

analysed as clusters outnumber <strong>the</strong> languages <strong>in</strong> which <strong>the</strong>y are most appropriately<br />

analysed as preaspirated stops.<br />

– 36 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!