Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

“normal” unaspirated, voiceless stops. For Halh Mongolian, for example, which Svantesson & Karlsson (2002) have shown has normatively preaspirated stops, two divergent descriptions of the “strong” vs. “weak” contrast exist. According to Svantesson & Karlsson, Ramstedt (1902) described the strong series as postaspirated in word-initial position, and pre- and postaspirated in word-medial position. This description is echoed in Vladimircov (1929), Poppe (1936, 1951) and Sanzheev (1953). However, it seems that there is a more widespread belief that the strong vs. weak contrast is expressed as voiceless vs. voiced stop in all positions. This characterisation of the contrast can be found in, for example, Rudnev (1905), Hattori (1943) and Todaeva (1951). Thus, although Ramstedt had correctly identified the occurrence of preaspirated stops in Halh Mongolian, this did not prevent the less correct description of stops such as simply voiceless unaspirated (contrasting with voiced stops) from gaining ground. The case of Halh Mongolian preaspiration suggests that preaspiration is particularly difficult to detect in impressionistic analysis. It is only through the instrumental analysis of Svantesson & Karlsson that we can confirm that there are preaspirated stops in Halh Mongolian. Since most existing phonematic descriptions of languages are based on impressionistic analyses, including those that make up the bulk of the UPSID data, one may begin to suspect that preaspirated stops are far more frequent in the world’s languages than has hitherto been thought. But even if normatively preaspirated stops occur more frequently than was previously believed, they may still be relatively rare. And, as I have claimed, preaspiration seems to be a subtle, almost evasive phonetic trait that tends to escape detection in auditory analysis. The apparent rarity and elusiveness of preaspirated stops may have to do with the perceptual characteristics of the preaspiration noise. Is it hard to hear preaspiration? And is this the reason for its apparent rarity? These questions are considered in the following section. – 34 –

2.6 Auditory constraints and the rarity of preaspiration The apparent rarity of normative preaspiration in the world’s languages has not received much attention in the literature. One of the few extant accounts that deals with the issue of on an empirical basis is Bladon’s (1986) explanation of the rarity of preaspiration in terms of auditory constraints. Drawing mostly on the research of Delgutte (1980, 1982), Bladon has established a set of general principles of audition. These principles act as constraints on the possible sound patterns of languages. Sound patterns that, in some way, provide good perceptual discriminability are favoured over those that result in poor discriminability. In this way, Bladon tries to explain some general tendencies in the sound patterns in languages. Of the constraints proposed by Bladon, mainly two are of concern here: On/off response asymmetry and Short-term adaptation. As for On/off response asymmetry, Bladon proposes that “spectral changes whose response in the auditory nerve is mainly onset of firing are much more perceptually salient than those producing an offset.” Using preaspiration as an example, Bladon points out that any temporal information for the preaspiration relies entirely on the detection of offsets, rather than onsets, which is poor in terms of salience. Postaspiration, on the other hand, is optimally salient from this point of view, since it is preceded by a silence. And as regards Short-term adaptation, Bladon refers to Delgutte’s (1980, 1982) work, saying that “after a rapid onset of auditory nerve discharge at a particular frequency, there is a decay to a moderate level of discharge even though the same speech sound is continuing to be produced.” Turning to preaspiration again, Bladon notes that, unlike postaspiration, preaspiration is subject to widespread short-term adaptation. This results from the fact that a vowel and a following preaspiration have very similar spectral characteristics and therefore there is little chance of neural recovery before the onset of preaspiration. Thus, preaspiration takes pride of place among Bladon’s examples of sound patterns that are bad for audition. In fact, Bladon describes preaspiration as an “auditory phonetic dinosaur” that could hardly be less – 35 –

2.6 Auditory constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rarity of<br />

preaspiration<br />

The apparent rarity of normative preaspiration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world’s languages<br />

has not received much attention <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature. One of <strong>the</strong> few extant<br />

accounts that deals with <strong>the</strong> issue of on an empirical basis is Bladon’s<br />

(1986) explanation of <strong>the</strong> rarity of preaspiration <strong>in</strong> terms of auditory constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />

Draw<strong>in</strong>g mostly on <strong>the</strong> research of Delgutte (1980, 1982), Bladon<br />

has established a set of general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of audition. These pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

act as constra<strong>in</strong>ts on <strong>the</strong> possible sound patterns of languages. Sound<br />

patterns that, <strong>in</strong> some way, provide good perceptual discrim<strong>in</strong>ability are<br />

favoured over those that result <strong>in</strong> poor discrim<strong>in</strong>ability. In this way, Bladon<br />

tries to expla<strong>in</strong> some general tendencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sound patterns <strong>in</strong> languages.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts proposed by Bladon, ma<strong>in</strong>ly two are of concern<br />

here: On/off response asymmetry <strong>and</strong> Short-term adaptation. As for<br />

On/off response asymmetry, Bladon proposes that “spectral changes<br />

whose response <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> auditory nerve is ma<strong>in</strong>ly onset of fir<strong>in</strong>g are much<br />

more perceptually salient than those produc<strong>in</strong>g an offset.” Us<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration<br />

as an example, Bladon po<strong>in</strong>ts out that any temporal <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

for <strong>the</strong> preaspiration relies entirely on <strong>the</strong> detection of offsets, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

onsets, which is poor <strong>in</strong> terms of salience. Postaspiration, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, is optimally salient from this po<strong>in</strong>t of view, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is preceded by<br />

a silence.<br />

And as regards Short-term adaptation, Bladon refers to Delgutte’s<br />

(1980, 1982) work, say<strong>in</strong>g that “after a rapid onset of auditory nerve discharge<br />

at a particular frequency, <strong>the</strong>re is a decay to a moderate level of<br />

discharge even though <strong>the</strong> same speech sound is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to be produced.”<br />

Turn<strong>in</strong>g to preaspiration aga<strong>in</strong>, Bladon notes that, unlike postaspiration,<br />

preaspiration is subject to widespread short-term adaptation.<br />

This results from <strong>the</strong> fact that a vowel <strong>and</strong> a follow<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration have<br />

very similar spectral characteristics <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>re is little chance of<br />

neural recovery before <strong>the</strong> onset of preaspiration.<br />

Thus, preaspiration takes pride of place among Bladon’s examples of<br />

sound patterns that are bad for audition. In fact, Bladon describes preaspiration<br />

as an “auditory phonetic d<strong>in</strong>osaur” that could hardly be less<br />

– 35 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!