Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
“normal” unaspirated, voiceless stops. For Halh Mongolian, for example, which Svantesson & Karlsson (2002) have shown has normatively preaspirated stops, two divergent descriptions of the “strong” vs. “weak” contrast exist. According to Svantesson & Karlsson, Ramstedt (1902) described the strong series as postaspirated in word-initial position, and pre- and postaspirated in word-medial position. This description is echoed in Vladimircov (1929), Poppe (1936, 1951) and Sanzheev (1953). However, it seems that there is a more widespread belief that the strong vs. weak contrast is expressed as voiceless vs. voiced stop in all positions. This characterisation of the contrast can be found in, for example, Rudnev (1905), Hattori (1943) and Todaeva (1951). Thus, although Ramstedt had correctly identified the occurrence of preaspirated stops in Halh Mongolian, this did not prevent the less correct description of stops such as simply voiceless unaspirated (contrasting with voiced stops) from gaining ground. The case of Halh Mongolian preaspiration suggests that preaspiration is particularly difficult to detect in impressionistic analysis. It is only through the instrumental analysis of Svantesson & Karlsson that we can confirm that there are preaspirated stops in Halh Mongolian. Since most existing phonematic descriptions of languages are based on impressionistic analyses, including those that make up the bulk of the UPSID data, one may begin to suspect that preaspirated stops are far more frequent in the world’s languages than has hitherto been thought. But even if normatively preaspirated stops occur more frequently than was previously believed, they may still be relatively rare. And, as I have claimed, preaspiration seems to be a subtle, almost evasive phonetic trait that tends to escape detection in auditory analysis. The apparent rarity and elusiveness of preaspirated stops may have to do with the perceptual characteristics of the preaspiration noise. Is it hard to hear preaspiration? And is this the reason for its apparent rarity? These questions are considered in the following section. – 34 –
2.6 Auditory constraints and the rarity of preaspiration The apparent rarity of normative preaspiration in the world’s languages has not received much attention in the literature. One of the few extant accounts that deals with the issue of on an empirical basis is Bladon’s (1986) explanation of the rarity of preaspiration in terms of auditory constraints. Drawing mostly on the research of Delgutte (1980, 1982), Bladon has established a set of general principles of audition. These principles act as constraints on the possible sound patterns of languages. Sound patterns that, in some way, provide good perceptual discriminability are favoured over those that result in poor discriminability. In this way, Bladon tries to explain some general tendencies in the sound patterns in languages. Of the constraints proposed by Bladon, mainly two are of concern here: On/off response asymmetry and Short-term adaptation. As for On/off response asymmetry, Bladon proposes that “spectral changes whose response in the auditory nerve is mainly onset of firing are much more perceptually salient than those producing an offset.” Using preaspiration as an example, Bladon points out that any temporal information for the preaspiration relies entirely on the detection of offsets, rather than onsets, which is poor in terms of salience. Postaspiration, on the other hand, is optimally salient from this point of view, since it is preceded by a silence. And as regards Short-term adaptation, Bladon refers to Delgutte’s (1980, 1982) work, saying that “after a rapid onset of auditory nerve discharge at a particular frequency, there is a decay to a moderate level of discharge even though the same speech sound is continuing to be produced.” Turning to preaspiration again, Bladon notes that, unlike postaspiration, preaspiration is subject to widespread short-term adaptation. This results from the fact that a vowel and a following preaspiration have very similar spectral characteristics and therefore there is little chance of neural recovery before the onset of preaspiration. Thus, preaspiration takes pride of place among Bladon’s examples of sound patterns that are bad for audition. In fact, Bladon describes preaspiration as an “auditory phonetic dinosaur” that could hardly be less – 35 –
- Page 1: Preaspiration in the Nordic Languag
- Page 4 and 5: PhD dissertation November 2002 Depa
- Page 7 and 8: CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS..........
- Page 9: 4.4.4 Preaspiration duration — SW
- Page 12 and 13: the following pages. Thanks also to
- Page 14 and 15: ported, but these should only be ta
- Page 16 and 17: Finally, in Chapter 5, the patterns
- Page 18 and 19: lock (ibid:267; boldface mine). Wea
- Page 20 and 21: closure, decay time of the glottal
- Page 23 and 24: 2 DEFINITION AND TYPOLOGY 2.1 Defin
- Page 25 and 26: and Finnish the word [lhti] ‘bay
- Page 27 and 28: turn into ChV sequences in which V
- Page 29 and 30: 2.2 Linking preaspiration and sonor
- Page 31 and 32: The similarity in gestural organisa
- Page 33 and 34: The fact that both preaspiration an
- Page 35 and 36: have normative preaspiration, other
- Page 37 and 38: usually expressed as unaspirated an
- Page 39 and 40: while clusters have developed into
- Page 41 and 42: ted as voiceless unaspirated or pos
- Page 43 and 44: y a middle-aged male speaker. In bo
- Page 45: ut this is not true of the “stand
- Page 49 and 50: The second criticism of Bladon’s
- Page 51 and 52: in discharge rates in the auditory
- Page 53: number of languages that possess se
- Page 56 and 57: and Lappic (Finno-Ugric). It has be
- Page 58 and 59: For the sake of simplicity and luci
- Page 60 and 61: ‘apple,’ [vh] vatnið ‘the wa
- Page 62 and 63: Table 3-1. Reflexes of Old Norse st
- Page 64 and 65: In the Northern dialect, V is sligh
- Page 66 and 67: Pind’s experiments as well as the
- Page 68 and 69: In Area 2, where Tórshavn is situa
- Page 70 and 71: in VC syllables in their speech, ju
- Page 72 and 73: Table 3-4. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 74 and 75: long vowel followed by a preaspirat
- Page 76 and 77: grams), with the occasional aid of
- Page 78 and 79: quantity system instead of the ON f
- Page 80 and 81: ON flytja). There are no examples o
- Page 82 and 83: Table 3-7. Reflexes of ON stops in
- Page 84 and 85: whether she thinks that leaving out
- Page 86 and 87: (Hede, Linsäll and Sveg) as well a
- Page 88 and 89: (VC vs. VC). For two pairs (/tak/ v
- Page 90 and 91: stop sequences that remain to be di
- Page 92 and 93: do occur systematic linguistic diff
- Page 94 and 95: Gräsö Forsmark Valö S W E D E N
2.6 Auditory constra<strong>in</strong>ts <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> rarity of<br />
preaspiration<br />
The apparent rarity of normative preaspiration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> world’s languages<br />
has not received much attention <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> literature. One of <strong>the</strong> few extant<br />
accounts that deals with <strong>the</strong> issue of on an empirical basis is Bladon’s<br />
(1986) explanation of <strong>the</strong> rarity of preaspiration <strong>in</strong> terms of auditory constra<strong>in</strong>ts.<br />
Draw<strong>in</strong>g mostly on <strong>the</strong> research of Delgutte (1980, 1982), Bladon<br />
has established a set of general pr<strong>in</strong>ciples of audition. These pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />
act as constra<strong>in</strong>ts on <strong>the</strong> possible sound patterns of languages. Sound<br />
patterns that, <strong>in</strong> some way, provide good perceptual discrim<strong>in</strong>ability are<br />
favoured over those that result <strong>in</strong> poor discrim<strong>in</strong>ability. In this way, Bladon<br />
tries to expla<strong>in</strong> some general tendencies <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sound patterns <strong>in</strong> languages.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong> constra<strong>in</strong>ts proposed by Bladon, ma<strong>in</strong>ly two are of concern<br />
here: On/off response asymmetry <strong>and</strong> Short-term adaptation. As for<br />
On/off response asymmetry, Bladon proposes that “spectral changes<br />
whose response <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> auditory nerve is ma<strong>in</strong>ly onset of fir<strong>in</strong>g are much<br />
more perceptually salient than those produc<strong>in</strong>g an offset.” Us<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration<br />
as an example, Bladon po<strong>in</strong>ts out that any temporal <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
for <strong>the</strong> preaspiration relies entirely on <strong>the</strong> detection of offsets, ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />
onsets, which is poor <strong>in</strong> terms of salience. Postaspiration, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />
h<strong>and</strong>, is optimally salient from this po<strong>in</strong>t of view, s<strong>in</strong>ce it is preceded by<br />
a silence.<br />
And as regards Short-term adaptation, Bladon refers to Delgutte’s<br />
(1980, 1982) work, say<strong>in</strong>g that “after a rapid onset of auditory nerve discharge<br />
at a particular frequency, <strong>the</strong>re is a decay to a moderate level of<br />
discharge even though <strong>the</strong> same speech sound is cont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g to be produced.”<br />
Turn<strong>in</strong>g to preaspiration aga<strong>in</strong>, Bladon notes that, unlike postaspiration,<br />
preaspiration is subject to widespread short-term adaptation.<br />
This results from <strong>the</strong> fact that a vowel <strong>and</strong> a follow<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration have<br />
very similar spectral characteristics <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>refore <strong>the</strong>re is little chance of<br />
neural recovery before <strong>the</strong> onset of preaspiration.<br />
Thus, preaspiration takes pride of place among Bladon’s examples of<br />
sound patterns that are bad for audition. In fact, Bladon describes preaspiration<br />
as an “auditory phonetic d<strong>in</strong>osaur” that could hardly be less<br />
– 35 –