26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ted as voiceless unaspirated or postaspirated. The development of preaspiration<br />

before sibilants is less consistent. Thus a Common Turkic sequence<br />

of a short vowel <strong>and</strong> a sibilant does not always yield preaspiration,<br />

but at <strong>the</strong> same time it seems clear that a Common Turkic sequence<br />

of a long vowel <strong>and</strong> a sibilant never results <strong>in</strong> preaspiration.<br />

In addition to Western Yugur, Roos also cites examples from both<br />

Tuvan <strong>and</strong> Tofa 1 , which are fairly closely related to Western Yugur but<br />

are spoken <strong>in</strong> Russia, <strong>in</strong> a region northwest of Mongolia. Both Tuvan <strong>and</strong><br />

Tofa have been reported to have “pharyngealised” consonants (cf., e.g.,<br />

Schönig, 1998), <strong>and</strong> Roos po<strong>in</strong>ts out that <strong>the</strong> distribution of pharyngealisation<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se languages corresponds very well with <strong>the</strong> distribution of<br />

preaspiration <strong>in</strong> Western Yugur, so much so that <strong>the</strong>y are bound to reflect<br />

a common orig<strong>in</strong>. In fact, Roos transcribes his Tuvan <strong>and</strong> Tofa examples<br />

(aga<strong>in</strong> taken from several sources) as hav<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration ra<strong>the</strong>r than<br />

some k<strong>in</strong>d of a pharyngealised or glottalised element. For example, for<br />

Tuvan he offers <strong>the</strong> example t ‘grass’ with preaspiration, whereas, for<br />

example, Johanson (1998:98) offers t, with a glottalised stop.<br />

The sentiment that Tuvan <strong>and</strong> Tofa pharyngealisation is misrepresented<br />

is echoed <strong>in</strong> Liberman (1982:126ff; 300f). Like Roos, Liberman<br />

transcribes Tuvan examples with preaspiration ra<strong>the</strong>r than glottalisation.<br />

Fur<strong>the</strong>r, Liberman claims that what has been described as pharyngealisation<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> neighbour<strong>in</strong>g language isolate Ket is also preaspiration. However,<br />

I have no true first-h<strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong>formation confirm<strong>in</strong>g that pharyngealisation<br />

<strong>in</strong> Tuvan, Tofa <strong>and</strong> Ket is actually most appropriately described as<br />

preaspiration.<br />

Lastly, we turn to Halh Mongolian. Mongolian has two stop series,<br />

usually referred to as “strong” <strong>and</strong> “weak” (correspond<strong>in</strong>g to fortis <strong>and</strong><br />

lenis). Svantesson & Karlsson (2002) have shown that <strong>the</strong> “strong” stops<br />

of Ulaanbaatar Halh (i.e., <strong>the</strong> variety spoken <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mongolian capital,<br />

Ulaanbaatar) are preaspirated. They also found that <strong>in</strong> sonorant + stop<br />

sequences, <strong>the</strong> “strong” series is expressed through partial voicelessness<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> sonorant preced<strong>in</strong>g a voiceless stop, while <strong>the</strong> “weak” series has a<br />

fully voiced sonorant before a voiceless stop. Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Svantesson &<br />

Karlsson, preaspiration <strong>in</strong> Ulaanbaatar Halh also occurs on word-<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

1 An alternate name is (Turkic) Karagas.<br />

– 29 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!