26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

while clusters have developed <strong>in</strong>to gem<strong>in</strong>ate stops. Thus <strong>the</strong> preaspirat<strong>in</strong>g<br />

speakers of Goajiro seem to contrast <strong>in</strong>tervocalic preaspirated<br />

stops with <strong>in</strong>tervocalic gem<strong>in</strong>ate stops, much as do speakers of Icel<strong>and</strong>ic.<br />

In Maddieson’s (1984) description of Goajiro, no such stop contrast is<br />

reported. It is possible that a normative stop contrast once existed, but<br />

that it was already disappear<strong>in</strong>g at <strong>the</strong> time of Holmer’s observations <strong>and</strong><br />

later died out completely. Whe<strong>the</strong>r this contrast is upheld by some o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

means (for example through duration) by non-preaspirat<strong>in</strong>g speakers is<br />

unclear.<br />

Ladefoged & Maddieson (1996:73) analysed a record<strong>in</strong>g of a Goajiro<br />

speaker who did not preaspirate consistently but “sometimes used a<br />

breathy voice offset to a vowel that was followed by a long stop.” S<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

<strong>the</strong>re are no durational measurements of <strong>the</strong> stops <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y are not<br />

“tagged” for historical orig<strong>in</strong>, it is impossible to tell whe<strong>the</strong>r or not <strong>the</strong><br />

contrast described by Holmer is upheld.<br />

Accord<strong>in</strong>g to Holmer, a peculiarity <strong>in</strong> Goajiro preaspiration is that<br />

word-<strong>in</strong>itial stops can be preaspirated if <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g word or prefix<br />

ends <strong>in</strong> a vowel. Thus a word like pana, 1 ‘leaf,’ will be produced as<br />

pana utterance-<strong>in</strong>itially, without aspiration, but postvocalically <strong>the</strong><br />

[p] is preaspirated, as <strong>in</strong> unuupana ‘tree leaf’ <strong>and</strong> nupana ‘its<br />

leaf; leaves.’ As Hansson po<strong>in</strong>ts out (1997:32), this pattern is rem<strong>in</strong>iscent<br />

of Fitzgerald’s account of O’odham.<br />

Material suggest<strong>in</strong>g that preaspiration is found <strong>in</strong> Forest Nenets dates<br />

as far back as <strong>the</strong> middle of <strong>the</strong> 19 th century (Hansson 1997:24). Hansson<br />

<strong>in</strong>terprets his sources (Lehtisalo 1947, 1956, 1960; Posti 1954; Marosán<br />

1983) as <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that a long stop <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Tundra Nenets dialect corresponds<br />

to a preaspirated stop <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> Forest Nenets dialect. Given that<br />

Hansson’s sources are competent <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish, <strong>and</strong> are thus familiar with a<br />

language <strong>in</strong> which /h/ can occur <strong>in</strong> any preconsonantal position, it may<br />

be assumed that Forest Nenets allows aspirative sounds only before stops<br />

<strong>and</strong> not before o<strong>the</strong>r consonants. O<strong>the</strong>rwise, <strong>the</strong>se authors would have<br />

analysed <strong>the</strong> pre-occlusive aspiration as /h/, like <strong>the</strong>y would <strong>in</strong> F<strong>in</strong>nish.<br />

1<br />

The double brackets <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>the</strong>se transcriptions are taken from Holmer’s work<br />

(cf. Chapter 3.1).<br />

– 27 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!