Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
have normative preaspiration, o<strong>the</strong>rs have normative postaspiration <strong>and</strong><br />
<strong>in</strong> some cases one f<strong>in</strong>ds normatively unaspirated stops. CSw sets itself<br />
apart from <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r dialects <strong>in</strong> terms of aspiration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se medial stops.<br />
In CSw, such stops are frequently preaspirated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> speech of some<br />
<strong>in</strong>formants, while o<strong>the</strong>rs tend to preaspirate much less or hardly at all.<br />
Therefore, <strong>the</strong> preaspiration found <strong>in</strong> CSw can be said to be nonnormative.<br />
That is, <strong>the</strong> absence of preaspiration <strong>in</strong> CSw does not lead to<br />
a pronunciation that is considered deviant, even though preaspiration is a<br />
regular feature for many speakers.<br />
One might wonder whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> concept of free variation could not<br />
replace non-normative <strong>in</strong> this discussion. Indeed, <strong>the</strong> two terms have<br />
very similar connotations. However, note that non-normative variation<br />
does not necessarily imply that <strong>the</strong> variation is free. In <strong>the</strong> data on CSw<br />
(discussed <strong>in</strong> greater detail <strong>in</strong> Ch. 4), <strong>the</strong>re is one speaker who is particularly<br />
prone to produc<strong>in</strong>g fortis stops with preaspiration. In fact, this<br />
speaker almost always produces such stops with preaspiration. For this<br />
speaker, <strong>the</strong>n, it is difficult to say that preaspiration <strong>in</strong> fortis stops <strong>in</strong> her<br />
speech has “free” variation. At <strong>the</strong> same time, her preaspirations are not<br />
normative, s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong>re are speakers who regularly produce fortis stops<br />
with little or no preaspiration. However, if <strong>the</strong> reader feels that “free variation”<br />
covers this sort of variation, <strong>the</strong>n <strong>the</strong> terms are <strong>in</strong>terchangeable.<br />
2.4 The geographical distribution of<br />
preaspiration<br />
Hansson (1997) gives a detailed overview of <strong>the</strong> literature on reported<br />
occurrences of preaspiration. The follow<strong>in</strong>g account of <strong>the</strong> known<br />
geographical distribution of preaspiration draws heavily on Hansson’s<br />
study. In some cases I try to evaluate <strong>the</strong>se reports <strong>in</strong> terms of whe<strong>the</strong>r<br />
<strong>the</strong> language <strong>in</strong> question is an hC-cluster type or a preaspiration type language,<br />
as well as whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> preaspiration should be considered normative<br />
or non-normative. Also, some languages not <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> Hansson’s<br />
overview are discussed.<br />
Outside Europe, <strong>the</strong>re are very few languages <strong>in</strong> which preaspiration<br />
has been reported to occur. A total of 15 languages are discussed here,<br />
but <strong>in</strong> very few of <strong>the</strong>se cases can we reliably conclude that what is be<strong>in</strong>g<br />
– 23 –