26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2.2 L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration <strong>and</strong> sonorant<br />

voicelessness<br />

A phenomenon that seems to be <strong>in</strong>timately l<strong>in</strong>ked with preaspiration<br />

is voicelessness <strong>in</strong> sonorants preced<strong>in</strong>g a stop, commonly referred to as<br />

sonorant devoic<strong>in</strong>g. Several authors have treated this subject from different<br />

angles (cf., e.g., Pétursson (1976) for a physiological perspective,<br />

Thrá<strong>in</strong>sson (1978) for a phonological perspective <strong>and</strong> Hansson (1997)<br />

for a historical perspective). It is a strik<strong>in</strong>g fact that most of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong><br />

languages that contrast preaspirated stops with unaspirated ones also tend<br />

to contrast sequences of (at least partially) voiceless sonorant + stop with<br />

voiced sonorant + stop (voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> stop varies). This is so <strong>in</strong>, for example,<br />

Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Icel<strong>and</strong>ic, Tórshavn Faroese <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Gräsö<br />

dialect of Swedish. It is no less strik<strong>in</strong>g that both Scots-Gaelic <strong>and</strong> most<br />

Saami languages, which have preaspirated stops, also have such voiceless<br />

sonorants.<br />

This has a direct parallel <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way sonorants are produced when<br />

<strong>the</strong>y follow stops, i.e. stop + sonorant clusters. Many languages that have<br />

an aspirated <strong>and</strong> an unaspirated stop series may also have a dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />

between voiced <strong>and</strong> (partially) voiceless sonorants follow<strong>in</strong>g a stop.<br />

Often, <strong>the</strong> phonological analysis of a language makes this less than explicit.<br />

Such an analysis may <strong>in</strong>dicate that a contrast is made between a<br />

voiced unaspirated stop followed by a voiced sonorant <strong>and</strong> a voiceless<br />

aspirated stop followed by a voiced sonorant, e.g., English /blænd/ bl<strong>and</strong><br />

vs. /plænd/ planned. The pronunciation, though, will typically contrast a<br />

sequence of a voiced occlusion + voiced sonorant with a voiceless occlusion<br />

+ (partially) voiceless sonorant, [blænd] vs. [pænd]. 1 The parallel<br />

with voiceless sonorants preced<strong>in</strong>g stops is obvious, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />

articulatory organisation <strong>the</strong> two are very similar. Voice onset is delayed<br />

relative to stop release to produce a voiceless sonorant after a stop, <strong>and</strong><br />

voice offset is made to occur earlier relative to stop closure to produce a<br />

voiceless sonorant before a stop.<br />

1 The exact nature of this contrast depends on such factors as phonetic context, speaker<br />

<strong>and</strong> dialect. This example can be said to apply <strong>in</strong> voiced contexts (e.g. when <strong>the</strong><br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g word ends with a vowel) <strong>in</strong> middle-class London English.<br />

– 17 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!