Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
2.2 L<strong>in</strong>k<strong>in</strong>g preaspiration <strong>and</strong> sonorant<br />
voicelessness<br />
A phenomenon that seems to be <strong>in</strong>timately l<strong>in</strong>ked with preaspiration<br />
is voicelessness <strong>in</strong> sonorants preced<strong>in</strong>g a stop, commonly referred to as<br />
sonorant devoic<strong>in</strong>g. Several authors have treated this subject from different<br />
angles (cf., e.g., Pétursson (1976) for a physiological perspective,<br />
Thrá<strong>in</strong>sson (1978) for a phonological perspective <strong>and</strong> Hansson (1997)<br />
for a historical perspective). It is a strik<strong>in</strong>g fact that most of <strong>the</strong> <strong>Nordic</strong><br />
languages that contrast preaspirated stops with unaspirated ones also tend<br />
to contrast sequences of (at least partially) voiceless sonorant + stop with<br />
voiced sonorant + stop (voic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> stop varies). This is so <strong>in</strong>, for example,<br />
Sou<strong>the</strong>rn Icel<strong>and</strong>ic, Tórshavn Faroese <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Nor<strong>the</strong>rn Gräsö<br />
dialect of Swedish. It is no less strik<strong>in</strong>g that both Scots-Gaelic <strong>and</strong> most<br />
Saami languages, which have preaspirated stops, also have such voiceless<br />
sonorants.<br />
This has a direct parallel <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> way sonorants are produced when<br />
<strong>the</strong>y follow stops, i.e. stop + sonorant clusters. Many languages that have<br />
an aspirated <strong>and</strong> an unaspirated stop series may also have a dist<strong>in</strong>ction<br />
between voiced <strong>and</strong> (partially) voiceless sonorants follow<strong>in</strong>g a stop.<br />
Often, <strong>the</strong> phonological analysis of a language makes this less than explicit.<br />
Such an analysis may <strong>in</strong>dicate that a contrast is made between a<br />
voiced unaspirated stop followed by a voiced sonorant <strong>and</strong> a voiceless<br />
aspirated stop followed by a voiced sonorant, e.g., English /blænd/ bl<strong>and</strong><br />
vs. /plænd/ planned. The pronunciation, though, will typically contrast a<br />
sequence of a voiced occlusion + voiced sonorant with a voiceless occlusion<br />
+ (partially) voiceless sonorant, [blænd] vs. [pænd]. 1 The parallel<br />
with voiceless sonorants preced<strong>in</strong>g stops is obvious, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> terms of<br />
articulatory organisation <strong>the</strong> two are very similar. Voice onset is delayed<br />
relative to stop release to produce a voiceless sonorant after a stop, <strong>and</strong><br />
voice offset is made to occur earlier relative to stop closure to produce a<br />
voiceless sonorant before a stop.<br />
1 The exact nature of this contrast depends on such factors as phonetic context, speaker<br />
<strong>and</strong> dialect. This example can be said to apply <strong>in</strong> voiced contexts (e.g. when <strong>the</strong><br />
preced<strong>in</strong>g word ends with a vowel) <strong>in</strong> middle-class London English.<br />
– 17 –