Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

from t1 through t8, the productions of all speakers are contained within the norm, and, in a sense, define the norm. Like the CSw preaspirations, the production of raised and fronted variants may be non-normative, but are still not considered deviant in the linguistic community at large. However, an outside observer, observing the language at t1 and t8, with no information about the intervening stages, is likely to describe the change as one in which /a/ has changed into /æ/ or //. kHz 2.6 t 1 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.8 2.6 t 2 – 236 – 0.8 0.4 0.9 0.4 t 3 t 4 0.5 0.9 0.4 t 5 t 6 0.5 0.9 0.4 t 7 t 8 0.5 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.1 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 kHz Figure 5–1. A hypothetical example of an E/C vowel change. Each diamond represents normalised mean F2 (abscissa) and F1 (ordinate) values for a single speaker. The different graphs each represent a sample of a population of speakers at a specific time tn, t1 representing the initial state observed and t8 the final state observed. To make comparisons with the initial state (t1) easier, the mean values at t1 are depicted as grey diamonds in each graph.

The case of preaspiration can be described in the same E/C manner. In CSw today, the scope of phonetic variation with regard to preaspiration is roughly equivalent with stage t3 or t4 in the vowel change example. Note that this does not imply that there is a change in progress. The fact that stage t4 in our hypothetical vowel change is transitory applies to that change and not necessarily to others. As previously indicated, I believe that the relative freedom in the production of voice offset relative to oral closure has been a stable feature of most dialects in Scandinavia for more than a thousand years. In some areas the structure of phonetic variation for these stops has changed. The relative freedom in the timing of voice offset has been restricted to encompass only preaspirated variants or unaspirated variants. In cases in which preaspiration has become normative, the change has been described as one by which, for example, /tt/ becomes /ht/. Again, however, that does not entail that any single speaker at any time has been required to perform a phonological reinterpretation of the stops. A parallel case can be made for postaspiration. Let us now consider voicelessness in nasals before fortis stops. The tendency for anticipatory voice offset in nasals in CSw is much weaker than the preaspiration tendency. However, analogous to the hypocorrective process through which it was suggested that preaspiration became part of the pronunciation norm, it is possible that the relative freedom in the coordination of glottal and supraglottal gestures extended to nasal + fortis stop junctures. As discussed in Chapter 3, an ON sequence of nasal + fortis stop is, in most normatively preaspirating dialects, reflected as a sequence of voiceless (or partially voiceless) nasal followed by a voiceless stop. This indicates that such sequences may have had nasals with non-normative voicelessness in PN, which paralleled non-normative preaspiration. The production of half-voiced, halfvoiceless nasals in the Gräsö dialect demonstrates that normative voicelessness need not involve a completely voiceless nasal. By analogy, it is possible that non-normative voicelessness in nasals involved only partially voiceless nasals in PN. The E/C change scenario exemplified in Figure 5–1 may work equally well for voicelessness in nasals and postaspiration. Like preaspi- – 237 –

from t1 through t8, <strong>the</strong> productions of all speakers are conta<strong>in</strong>ed with<strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> norm, <strong>and</strong>, <strong>in</strong> a sense, def<strong>in</strong>e <strong>the</strong> norm. Like <strong>the</strong> CSw preaspirations,<br />

<strong>the</strong> production of raised <strong>and</strong> fronted variants may be non-normative, but<br />

are still not considered deviant <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> l<strong>in</strong>guistic community at large.<br />

However, an outside observer, observ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> language at t1 <strong>and</strong> t8, with<br />

no <strong>in</strong>formation about <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terven<strong>in</strong>g stages, is likely to describe <strong>the</strong><br />

change as one <strong>in</strong> which /a/ has changed <strong>in</strong>to /æ/ or //.<br />

kHz<br />

2.6<br />

t 1<br />

2.3<br />

2.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

0.8<br />

2.6<br />

t 2<br />

– 236 –<br />

0.8<br />

0.4<br />

0.9<br />

0.4<br />

t 3 t 4<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

0.4<br />

t 5 t 6<br />

0.5<br />

0.9<br />

0.4<br />

t 7 t 8<br />

0.5<br />

2.3<br />

2.0<br />

1.7<br />

1.4<br />

1.1<br />

0.5<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

0.7<br />

0.8<br />

0.9 kHz<br />

Figure 5–1. A hypo<strong>the</strong>tical example of an E/C vowel change. Each diamond represents<br />

normalised mean F2 (abscissa) <strong>and</strong> F1 (ord<strong>in</strong>ate) values for a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

speaker. The different graphs each represent a sample of a population of speakers<br />

at a specific time tn, t1 represent<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial state observed <strong>and</strong> t8 <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

state observed. To make comparisons with <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>itial state (t1) easier, <strong>the</strong> mean<br />

values at t1 are depicted as grey diamonds <strong>in</strong> each graph.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!