26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

as laughter dur<strong>in</strong>g production <strong>and</strong> external noise. Subject MG was particularly<br />

prone to produc<strong>in</strong>g fricated stop variants, <strong>and</strong> almost half of his<br />

(<strong>in</strong>tervocalic) word-<strong>in</strong>itial stops were produced <strong>in</strong> this manner. The rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

two subjects produced fricated variants relatively rarely. S<strong>in</strong>ce a<br />

def<strong>in</strong>ite po<strong>in</strong>t for <strong>the</strong> onset of oral closure <strong>and</strong> open<strong>in</strong>g cannot be established<br />

for fricated variants, <strong>the</strong>y cannot be <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> measurements of<br />

aspiration durations. For ES’s read speech data, none of <strong>the</strong> 56 word<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

stop tokens were excluded from analysis.<br />

Table 4–17. Overview of <strong>the</strong> word-<strong>in</strong>itial fortis stop data analysed for <strong>the</strong> four<br />

Western Ål<strong>and</strong> subjects.<br />

Unscripted Read<br />

MG AJ NK Total ES<br />

Stop closure 27 64 76 167 56<br />

Fricative 22 7 2 31 0<br />

Laughter etc. 3 11 10 24 0<br />

Total 52 82 88 222 56<br />

A similar overview of <strong>the</strong> word-medial stop data is given <strong>in</strong> Table 4–<br />

18. In total, 467 tokens of word-medial fortis stops occurred <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> unscripted<br />

data. Of <strong>the</strong>se, 73 were excluded from analysis. In 23 cases, a<br />

complete stop closure was not made <strong>and</strong> a fricative stop variant was produced.<br />

Aga<strong>in</strong>, subject MG produced <strong>the</strong> largest number of fricated stops.<br />

A fur<strong>the</strong>r 32 cases were excluded from analysis because ei<strong>the</strong>r stop or<br />

preced<strong>in</strong>g or follow<strong>in</strong>g vowel were produced such that measurements<br />

were impossible. A total of 18 cases were discarded because of laughter,<br />

external noise, etc. None of ES’s 59 stop tokens was discarded.<br />

F<strong>in</strong>ally, Table 4–19 gives an overview of <strong>the</strong> data analysed for sequences<br />

of nasal + stop + vowel. A total of 196 occurrences of such sequences<br />

were obta<strong>in</strong>ed from <strong>the</strong> unscripted data. Fricative variants are<br />

less common <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se data than <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>tervocalic data. For example,<br />

MG produced a fricated stop variant <strong>in</strong> only 5 of his 62 tokens. However,<br />

it is apparent that <strong>in</strong> 66 of a total of 196 cases were produced <strong>in</strong> such a<br />

way as to make reliable durational measurements impossible. This is due<br />

almost entirely to <strong>the</strong> tendency of <strong>the</strong> subjects to produce <strong>the</strong> negation<br />

– 195 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!