Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

is glottal during the first 50 ms. Then, there follows a period of clearly dental friction for about 85 ms before the stop closure is reached. Given its duration, this dental friction cannot be seen as a simple by-product of the stop closure gesture. Rather, as in the preceding example, it seems to be an “enhancement” of the preaspiration friction. s Figure 4–53. Inf. BJ: […sovorðið] slott e[lla…] ‘…some sort of palace or…’ Sometimes, both sources of supralaryngeal friction—the preceding vowel and the following stop—are present in the production of preaspiration. One such example is given in Figure 4–53. The vowel is back and half-open, and the stop is dental. Shortly after glottal abduction is initiated (15–20 ms), a uvular stricture is formed. Some striations are visible, which indicates movement in the uvula. This uvular stricture is maintained for approximately 55 ms. Then a dental stricture is formed, and maintained for approximately 60 ms, until a full dental closure has been made. Preaspiration before affricates invariably involves a period of palatal friction similar to that after close front vowels. In some cases the friction is short and can be seen as a by-product of the closing gesture, e.g. in the example in Figure 4–54. In most cases, though, the friction is more sustained, and is sometimes as long as the period of friction that occurs after the release, as in the example in Figure 4–55. In both examples (4– 54 and 4–55), the affricate is preceded by an open or half-open central vowel, but velar, uvular or pharyngeal friction is not produced. – 166 –

The emphasis here has been on instances in which preaspiration is enhanced through oral friction. However, there are also many cases in which preaspiration is weak or absent. These cases can almost always be attributed to hypo-articulation (Lindblom 1990), and are concomitant with reduced duration in the syllable as a whole. Summarising, we can say that there is a considerable degree of variation in the production of Faroese preaspiration. The friction produced can be purely glottal, but is usually accompanied by a short period of oral friction occurring just before an oral closure is achieved. These short periods of oral friction can be seen as by-products of the stop closure gesture. However, in many cases one observes that a considerably longer supralaryngeal friction is produced as well as, or instead of, glottal friction. h ç Figure 4–54. Subj. SG: […eitt] akke[r.] ‘…an anchor.’ – 167 – h ç Figure 4–55. Subj. MS: [. í] akkers[vík.] ‘In “Anchor bay.”’ The duration of these gestures makes it impossible to see them as fortuitous by-products of the closure gesture. Instead, it seems that the preaspiration is being “enhanced” by a supralaryngeal stricture. Speakers seem to achieve these enhancements by extrapolating either from stop place of articulation or maximal vowel stricture. Such an enhancement can be regarded as a process of fortition, since a weak glottal friction is replaced by a more intense, and thus more audible, oral friction. Finally, in some cases the glottal friction is short and weak or even audibly absent. This behaviour seems to be primarily a hypo-speech effect.

is glottal dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first 50 ms. Then, <strong>the</strong>re follows a period of clearly<br />

dental friction for about 85 ms before <strong>the</strong> stop closure is reached. Given<br />

its duration, this dental friction cannot be seen as a simple by-product of<br />

<strong>the</strong> stop closure gesture. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g example, it seems to<br />

be an “enhancement” of <strong>the</strong> preaspiration friction.<br />

s <br />

Figure 4–53. Inf. BJ: […sovorðið] slott e[lla…] ‘…some sort of palace or…’<br />

Sometimes, both sources of supralaryngeal friction—<strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g<br />

vowel <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g stop—are present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production of preaspiration.<br />

One such example is given <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–53. The vowel is back <strong>and</strong><br />

half-open, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> stop is dental. Shortly after glottal abduction is <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />

(15–20 ms), a uvular stricture is formed. Some striations are visible,<br />

which <strong>in</strong>dicates movement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uvula. This uvular stricture is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />

for approximately 55 ms. Then a dental stricture is formed, <strong>and</strong><br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for approximately 60 ms, until a full dental closure has been<br />

made.<br />

<strong>Preaspiration</strong> before affricates <strong>in</strong>variably <strong>in</strong>volves a period of palatal<br />

friction similar to that after close front vowels. In some cases <strong>the</strong> friction<br />

is short <strong>and</strong> can be seen as a by-product of <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g gesture, e.g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

example <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–54. In most cases, though, <strong>the</strong> friction is more<br />

susta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>and</strong> is sometimes as long as <strong>the</strong> period of friction that occurs<br />

after <strong>the</strong> release, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> example <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–55. In both examples (4–<br />

54 <strong>and</strong> 4–55), <strong>the</strong> affricate is preceded by an open or half-open central<br />

vowel, but velar, uvular or pharyngeal friction is not produced.<br />

– 166 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!