Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
is glottal during the first 50 ms. Then, there follows a period of clearly dental friction for about 85 ms before the stop closure is reached. Given its duration, this dental friction cannot be seen as a simple by-product of the stop closure gesture. Rather, as in the preceding example, it seems to be an “enhancement” of the preaspiration friction. s Figure 4–53. Inf. BJ: […sovorðið] slott e[lla…] ‘…some sort of palace or…’ Sometimes, both sources of supralaryngeal friction—the preceding vowel and the following stop—are present in the production of preaspiration. One such example is given in Figure 4–53. The vowel is back and half-open, and the stop is dental. Shortly after glottal abduction is initiated (15–20 ms), a uvular stricture is formed. Some striations are visible, which indicates movement in the uvula. This uvular stricture is maintained for approximately 55 ms. Then a dental stricture is formed, and maintained for approximately 60 ms, until a full dental closure has been made. Preaspiration before affricates invariably involves a period of palatal friction similar to that after close front vowels. In some cases the friction is short and can be seen as a by-product of the closing gesture, e.g. in the example in Figure 4–54. In most cases, though, the friction is more sustained, and is sometimes as long as the period of friction that occurs after the release, as in the example in Figure 4–55. In both examples (4– 54 and 4–55), the affricate is preceded by an open or half-open central vowel, but velar, uvular or pharyngeal friction is not produced. – 166 –
The emphasis here has been on instances in which preaspiration is enhanced through oral friction. However, there are also many cases in which preaspiration is weak or absent. These cases can almost always be attributed to hypo-articulation (Lindblom 1990), and are concomitant with reduced duration in the syllable as a whole. Summarising, we can say that there is a considerable degree of variation in the production of Faroese preaspiration. The friction produced can be purely glottal, but is usually accompanied by a short period of oral friction occurring just before an oral closure is achieved. These short periods of oral friction can be seen as by-products of the stop closure gesture. However, in many cases one observes that a considerably longer supralaryngeal friction is produced as well as, or instead of, glottal friction. h ç Figure 4–54. Subj. SG: […eitt] akke[r.] ‘…an anchor.’ – 167 – h ç Figure 4–55. Subj. MS: [. í] akkers[vík.] ‘In “Anchor bay.”’ The duration of these gestures makes it impossible to see them as fortuitous by-products of the closure gesture. Instead, it seems that the preaspiration is being “enhanced” by a supralaryngeal stricture. Speakers seem to achieve these enhancements by extrapolating either from stop place of articulation or maximal vowel stricture. Such an enhancement can be regarded as a process of fortition, since a weak glottal friction is replaced by a more intense, and thus more audible, oral friction. Finally, in some cases the glottal friction is short and weak or even audibly absent. This behaviour seems to be primarily a hypo-speech effect.
- Page 128 and 129: Several spectrographic examples of
- Page 130 and 131: The data indicate that there is lit
- Page 132 and 133: produced and in 9 cases there were
- Page 134 and 135: To examine effects of syllable stru
- Page 136 and 137: preaspiration for lexically stresse
- Page 138 and 139: durations exceeding 120 ms, preaspi
- Page 140 and 141: mately 70 ms. Just before the stop
- Page 142 and 143: noise becomes audibly postalveolar
- Page 144 and 145: As regards nasal + fortis stop sequ
- Page 146 and 147: most of the remaining instances he
- Page 148 and 149: (comparable to our taverna type) ha
- Page 150 and 151: The CSw data have shown that word-i
- Page 152 and 153: golf ‘golf,’ in which the utter
- Page 154 and 155: o Figure 4-35. Subj. GT: […tv]
- Page 156 and 157: word-initial lenis stop preceded by
- Page 158 and 159: (i.e., short mVOffT and long mVOT).
- Page 160 and 161: make it easier to refer to stops in
- Page 162 and 163: [mh] ‘food’ is used, and for fu
- Page 164 and 165: clear stop correlate, 26 (7%) had a
- Page 166 and 167: All subjects considered, for lenis
- Page 168 and 169: Figure 4-45(a) plots preaspiration
- Page 170 and 171: cluster and 2 instances with a kt c
- Page 172 and 173: 4.3.2.5 Postaspiration duration Ins
- Page 174 and 175: closure gesture. As the escape chan
- Page 176 and 177: fricative constriction cannot be at
- Page 180 and 181: 4.3.4 Summary and discussion As reg
- Page 182 and 183: from the preaspiration noise itself
- Page 184 and 185: Many instances of word-medial forti
- Page 186 and 187: In the Gräsö dialect, the sonoran
- Page 188 and 189: that the presence of a voiceless na
- Page 190 and 191: of this type as well. Remarkably, t
- Page 192 and 193: On the whole, the fortis vs. lenis
- Page 194 and 195: 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 120 100 80 60
- Page 196 and 197: Icelandic listeners, even though th
- Page 198 and 199: discussion of possible reasons for
- Page 200 and 201: Table 4-16. The findings of Indrið
- Page 202 and 203: these speakers will henceforth be r
- Page 204 and 205: lenes are often produced with a voi
- Page 206 and 207: Nasal + stop sequences in the Weste
- Page 208 and 209: inte ‘not’ without the final vo
- Page 210 and 211: ange for the remaining subjects is
- Page 212 and 213: For word-medial contexts data are a
- Page 214 and 215: instances may have preaspiration on
- Page 216 and 217: 4.6 Summary and conclusions The sur
- Page 218 and 219: that the ON word-initial lenes have
- Page 220 and 221: dialect in the Åland archipelago.
- Page 222 and 223: clear that ON m, n + p, t, k sequen
- Page 224 and 225: gradual process rather than a leap
- Page 226 and 227: stops that we find in, for example,
is glottal dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> first 50 ms. Then, <strong>the</strong>re follows a period of clearly<br />
dental friction for about 85 ms before <strong>the</strong> stop closure is reached. Given<br />
its duration, this dental friction cannot be seen as a simple by-product of<br />
<strong>the</strong> stop closure gesture. Ra<strong>the</strong>r, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g example, it seems to<br />
be an “enhancement” of <strong>the</strong> preaspiration friction.<br />
s <br />
Figure 4–53. Inf. BJ: […sovorðið] slott e[lla…] ‘…some sort of palace or…’<br />
Sometimes, both sources of supralaryngeal friction—<strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g<br />
vowel <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g stop—are present <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> production of preaspiration.<br />
One such example is given <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–53. The vowel is back <strong>and</strong><br />
half-open, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> stop is dental. Shortly after glottal abduction is <strong>in</strong>itiated<br />
(15–20 ms), a uvular stricture is formed. Some striations are visible,<br />
which <strong>in</strong>dicates movement <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> uvula. This uvular stricture is ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed<br />
for approximately 55 ms. Then a dental stricture is formed, <strong>and</strong><br />
ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed for approximately 60 ms, until a full dental closure has been<br />
made.<br />
<strong>Preaspiration</strong> before affricates <strong>in</strong>variably <strong>in</strong>volves a period of palatal<br />
friction similar to that after close front vowels. In some cases <strong>the</strong> friction<br />
is short <strong>and</strong> can be seen as a by-product of <strong>the</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g gesture, e.g. <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
example <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–54. In most cases, though, <strong>the</strong> friction is more<br />
susta<strong>in</strong>ed, <strong>and</strong> is sometimes as long as <strong>the</strong> period of friction that occurs<br />
after <strong>the</strong> release, as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> example <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–55. In both examples (4–<br />
54 <strong>and</strong> 4–55), <strong>the</strong> affricate is preceded by an open or half-open central<br />
vowel, but velar, uvular or pharyngeal friction is not produced.<br />
– 166 –