Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

(comparable to our taverna type) had an intermediate mean postaspiration duration of 32 ms. Löfqvist also found that the duration of the occlusion was longer for stops that followed a stressed vowel than for stops that followed an unstressed vowel. Thus, aspirations tended to be shortest when the occlusions were long. Given this tendency, Löfqvist leans towards attributing this difference in degree of aspiration to differences in closure duration. He says: […] one can argue that the loss of aspiration in Swedish voiceless stops in certain positions is due to an increase in the duration of the oral closure. This is evident from the fact that closure duration is longer for the unaspirated allophones and also because the interval from implosion to peak glottal opening can vary without any concomitant changes in aspiration for these sounds; the glottis is still in a position suitable for voicing to occur at the release since the glottal opening and closing gestures are executed during the occlusion. (Löfqvist 1976:29) This explanation yields a specific prediction. There should be an inverse relationship between closure duration and postaspiration duration in the CSw spontaneous data. Specifically, this relationship should be evident when one plots postaspiration duration against closure duration for stops in båten and vatten type words. However, Figures 4–24 and 4– 25 show that this prediction is not borne out by the data. In Figure 4–24, postaspiration duration is plotted against closure duration for all intervocalic stops in båten type words, and in Figure 4–25 for vatten type words. In both figures, results from all subjects (GT, CK, MP and FS) are pooled. Keep in mind, here, that postaspiration duration in these CSw data is measured as mVOT, not just VOT (see section 4.1.2), and thus the aspiration durations reported are generally longer than in Löfqvist’s study. In neither word type is there any correlation between closure duration and postaspiration duration. For båten type words r 2 = 0.0302 and for vatten type words r 2 = 0.0027. In fact, postaspiration durations seem to be fairly constant across different closure durations for both word types. Note also that the closure durations reported by Löfqvist are far greater than the closure durations in our CSw data. This is almost cer- – 136 –

tainly due to the fact that the CSw data are from unscripted (spontaneous) speech while Löfqvist’s data are from read nonsense words embedded in frame sentences. These durational differences between the two studies yield an interesting comparison. Löfqvist proposes that mean occlusion durations of 138 ms (word-initial stops) induce postaspirations that are relatively long (x¯ = 47 ms) while mean occlusion durations of 171–188 ms induce postaspirations that are quite short (x¯ = 15–16 ms). However, closure durations in båten type words in the CSw data, which seldom exceed 120 ms and are thus much shorter than the word-initial stops in Löfqvist’s experiment, still do not have any significant degree of aspiration. So, not only is there no inverse correlation between postaspiration duration and closure duration, but the short closure durations in the CSw should yield far greater postaspirations than those observed as well. Postaspiration dur. (ms) 120 80 40 0 – 137 – r 2 = 0.0302 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Closure duration (ms) Figure 4–24. Postaspiration duration plotted against closure duration for wordmedial fortis stops in båten type words. Results for all subjects are pooled. Postaspiration dur. (ms) 120 80 40 0 r 2 = 0.0027 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Closure duration (ms) Figure 4–25. Postaspiration duration plotted against closure duration for wordmedial fortis stops in vatten type words. Results for all subjects are pooled. Three outlying data points are not displayed.

(comparable to our taverna type) had an <strong>in</strong>termediate mean postaspiration<br />

duration of 32 ms.<br />

Löfqvist also found that <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong> occlusion was longer for<br />

stops that followed a stressed vowel than for stops that followed an unstressed<br />

vowel. Thus, aspirations tended to be shortest when <strong>the</strong> occlusions<br />

were long. Given this tendency, Löfqvist leans towards attribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />

this difference <strong>in</strong> degree of aspiration to differences <strong>in</strong> closure duration.<br />

He says:<br />

[…] one can argue that <strong>the</strong> loss of aspiration <strong>in</strong> Swedish voiceless<br />

stops <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> positions is due to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong><br />

oral closure. This is evident from <strong>the</strong> fact that closure duration is<br />

longer for <strong>the</strong> unaspirated allophones <strong>and</strong> also because <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval<br />

from implosion to peak glottal open<strong>in</strong>g can vary without any<br />

concomitant changes <strong>in</strong> aspiration for <strong>the</strong>se sounds; <strong>the</strong> glottis is still<br />

<strong>in</strong> a position suitable for voic<strong>in</strong>g to occur at <strong>the</strong> release s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><br />

glottal open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g gestures are executed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> occlusion.<br />

(Löfqvist 1976:29)<br />

This explanation yields a specific prediction. There should be an <strong>in</strong>verse<br />

relationship between closure duration <strong>and</strong> postaspiration duration<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CSw spontaneous data. Specifically, this relationship should be<br />

evident when one plots postaspiration duration aga<strong>in</strong>st closure duration<br />

for stops <strong>in</strong> båten <strong>and</strong> vatten type words. However, Figures 4–24 <strong>and</strong> 4–<br />

25 show that this prediction is not borne out by <strong>the</strong> data. In Figure 4–24,<br />

postaspiration duration is plotted aga<strong>in</strong>st closure duration for all<br />

<strong>in</strong>tervocalic stops <strong>in</strong> båten type words, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–25 for vatten type<br />

words. In both figures, results from all subjects (GT, CK, MP <strong>and</strong> FS)<br />

are pooled. Keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, here, that postaspiration duration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se CSw<br />

data is measured as mVOT, not just VOT (see section 4.1.2), <strong>and</strong> thus<br />

<strong>the</strong> aspiration durations reported are generally longer than <strong>in</strong> Löfqvist’s<br />

study. In nei<strong>the</strong>r word type is <strong>the</strong>re any correlation between closure<br />

duration <strong>and</strong> postaspiration duration. For båten type words r 2 = 0.0302<br />

<strong>and</strong> for vatten type words r 2 = 0.0027. In fact, postaspiration durations<br />

seem to be fairly constant across different closure durations for both<br />

word types.<br />

Note also that <strong>the</strong> closure durations reported by Löfqvist are far<br />

greater than <strong>the</strong> closure durations <strong>in</strong> our CSw data. This is almost cer-<br />

– 136 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!