Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
(comparable to our taverna type) had an intermediate mean postaspiration duration of 32 ms. Löfqvist also found that the duration of the occlusion was longer for stops that followed a stressed vowel than for stops that followed an unstressed vowel. Thus, aspirations tended to be shortest when the occlusions were long. Given this tendency, Löfqvist leans towards attributing this difference in degree of aspiration to differences in closure duration. He says: […] one can argue that the loss of aspiration in Swedish voiceless stops in certain positions is due to an increase in the duration of the oral closure. This is evident from the fact that closure duration is longer for the unaspirated allophones and also because the interval from implosion to peak glottal opening can vary without any concomitant changes in aspiration for these sounds; the glottis is still in a position suitable for voicing to occur at the release since the glottal opening and closing gestures are executed during the occlusion. (Löfqvist 1976:29) This explanation yields a specific prediction. There should be an inverse relationship between closure duration and postaspiration duration in the CSw spontaneous data. Specifically, this relationship should be evident when one plots postaspiration duration against closure duration for stops in båten and vatten type words. However, Figures 4–24 and 4– 25 show that this prediction is not borne out by the data. In Figure 4–24, postaspiration duration is plotted against closure duration for all intervocalic stops in båten type words, and in Figure 4–25 for vatten type words. In both figures, results from all subjects (GT, CK, MP and FS) are pooled. Keep in mind, here, that postaspiration duration in these CSw data is measured as mVOT, not just VOT (see section 4.1.2), and thus the aspiration durations reported are generally longer than in Löfqvist’s study. In neither word type is there any correlation between closure duration and postaspiration duration. For båten type words r 2 = 0.0302 and for vatten type words r 2 = 0.0027. In fact, postaspiration durations seem to be fairly constant across different closure durations for both word types. Note also that the closure durations reported by Löfqvist are far greater than the closure durations in our CSw data. This is almost cer- – 136 –
tainly due to the fact that the CSw data are from unscripted (spontaneous) speech while Löfqvist’s data are from read nonsense words embedded in frame sentences. These durational differences between the two studies yield an interesting comparison. Löfqvist proposes that mean occlusion durations of 138 ms (word-initial stops) induce postaspirations that are relatively long (x¯ = 47 ms) while mean occlusion durations of 171–188 ms induce postaspirations that are quite short (x¯ = 15–16 ms). However, closure durations in båten type words in the CSw data, which seldom exceed 120 ms and are thus much shorter than the word-initial stops in Löfqvist’s experiment, still do not have any significant degree of aspiration. So, not only is there no inverse correlation between postaspiration duration and closure duration, but the short closure durations in the CSw should yield far greater postaspirations than those observed as well. Postaspiration dur. (ms) 120 80 40 0 – 137 – r 2 = 0.0302 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Closure duration (ms) Figure 4–24. Postaspiration duration plotted against closure duration for wordmedial fortis stops in båten type words. Results for all subjects are pooled. Postaspiration dur. (ms) 120 80 40 0 r 2 = 0.0027 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 Closure duration (ms) Figure 4–25. Postaspiration duration plotted against closure duration for wordmedial fortis stops in vatten type words. Results for all subjects are pooled. Three outlying data points are not displayed.
- Page 98 and 99: Kökar, in the Åboland archipelago
- Page 100 and 101: one hand, speakers have a tendency
- Page 102 and 103: ecent studies that corroborate thes
- Page 104 and 105: example, in a particular dialect, t
- Page 106 and 107: does not give her segmentation crit
- Page 108 and 109: Scotland and Ireland 1 [hphthk] 2 [
- Page 110 and 111: approximately 140-150 ms in VC syll
- Page 112 and 113: 1. South Saami (Southern & Ume Saam
- Page 114 and 115: 1987a), Estonian (Engstrand & Krull
- Page 116 and 117: Table 3-13. Reflexes of ON postvoca
- Page 118 and 119: and Tórshavn Faroese data were eli
- Page 120 and 121: ducing breathiness into the voice q
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 4-3. An example of a sequenc
- Page 124 and 125: 4.2 Central Standard Swedish (CSw)
- Page 126 and 127: very large, since postaspiration wa
- Page 128 and 129: Several spectrographic examples of
- Page 130 and 131: The data indicate that there is lit
- Page 132 and 133: produced and in 9 cases there were
- Page 134 and 135: To examine effects of syllable stru
- Page 136 and 137: preaspiration for lexically stresse
- Page 138 and 139: durations exceeding 120 ms, preaspi
- Page 140 and 141: mately 70 ms. Just before the stop
- Page 142 and 143: noise becomes audibly postalveolar
- Page 144 and 145: As regards nasal + fortis stop sequ
- Page 146 and 147: most of the remaining instances he
- Page 150 and 151: The CSw data have shown that word-i
- Page 152 and 153: golf ‘golf,’ in which the utter
- Page 154 and 155: o Figure 4-35. Subj. GT: […tv]
- Page 156 and 157: word-initial lenis stop preceded by
- Page 158 and 159: (i.e., short mVOffT and long mVOT).
- Page 160 and 161: make it easier to refer to stops in
- Page 162 and 163: [mh] ‘food’ is used, and for fu
- Page 164 and 165: clear stop correlate, 26 (7%) had a
- Page 166 and 167: All subjects considered, for lenis
- Page 168 and 169: Figure 4-45(a) plots preaspiration
- Page 170 and 171: cluster and 2 instances with a kt c
- Page 172 and 173: 4.3.2.5 Postaspiration duration Ins
- Page 174 and 175: closure gesture. As the escape chan
- Page 176 and 177: fricative constriction cannot be at
- Page 178 and 179: is glottal during the first 50 ms.
- Page 180 and 181: 4.3.4 Summary and discussion As reg
- Page 182 and 183: from the preaspiration noise itself
- Page 184 and 185: Many instances of word-medial forti
- Page 186 and 187: In the Gräsö dialect, the sonoran
- Page 188 and 189: that the presence of a voiceless na
- Page 190 and 191: of this type as well. Remarkably, t
- Page 192 and 193: On the whole, the fortis vs. lenis
- Page 194 and 195: 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 120 100 80 60
- Page 196 and 197: Icelandic listeners, even though th
(comparable to our taverna type) had an <strong>in</strong>termediate mean postaspiration<br />
duration of 32 ms.<br />
Löfqvist also found that <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong> occlusion was longer for<br />
stops that followed a stressed vowel than for stops that followed an unstressed<br />
vowel. Thus, aspirations tended to be shortest when <strong>the</strong> occlusions<br />
were long. Given this tendency, Löfqvist leans towards attribut<strong>in</strong>g<br />
this difference <strong>in</strong> degree of aspiration to differences <strong>in</strong> closure duration.<br />
He says:<br />
[…] one can argue that <strong>the</strong> loss of aspiration <strong>in</strong> Swedish voiceless<br />
stops <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> positions is due to an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> duration of <strong>the</strong><br />
oral closure. This is evident from <strong>the</strong> fact that closure duration is<br />
longer for <strong>the</strong> unaspirated allophones <strong>and</strong> also because <strong>the</strong> <strong>in</strong>terval<br />
from implosion to peak glottal open<strong>in</strong>g can vary without any<br />
concomitant changes <strong>in</strong> aspiration for <strong>the</strong>se sounds; <strong>the</strong> glottis is still<br />
<strong>in</strong> a position suitable for voic<strong>in</strong>g to occur at <strong>the</strong> release s<strong>in</strong>ce <strong>the</strong><br />
glottal open<strong>in</strong>g <strong>and</strong> clos<strong>in</strong>g gestures are executed dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> occlusion.<br />
(Löfqvist 1976:29)<br />
This explanation yields a specific prediction. There should be an <strong>in</strong>verse<br />
relationship between closure duration <strong>and</strong> postaspiration duration<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> CSw spontaneous data. Specifically, this relationship should be<br />
evident when one plots postaspiration duration aga<strong>in</strong>st closure duration<br />
for stops <strong>in</strong> båten <strong>and</strong> vatten type words. However, Figures 4–24 <strong>and</strong> 4–<br />
25 show that this prediction is not borne out by <strong>the</strong> data. In Figure 4–24,<br />
postaspiration duration is plotted aga<strong>in</strong>st closure duration for all<br />
<strong>in</strong>tervocalic stops <strong>in</strong> båten type words, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> Figure 4–25 for vatten type<br />
words. In both figures, results from all subjects (GT, CK, MP <strong>and</strong> FS)<br />
are pooled. Keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d, here, that postaspiration duration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong>se CSw<br />
data is measured as mVOT, not just VOT (see section 4.1.2), <strong>and</strong> thus<br />
<strong>the</strong> aspiration durations reported are generally longer than <strong>in</strong> Löfqvist’s<br />
study. In nei<strong>the</strong>r word type is <strong>the</strong>re any correlation between closure<br />
duration <strong>and</strong> postaspiration duration. For båten type words r 2 = 0.0302<br />
<strong>and</strong> for vatten type words r 2 = 0.0027. In fact, postaspiration durations<br />
seem to be fairly constant across different closure durations for both<br />
word types.<br />
Note also that <strong>the</strong> closure durations reported by Löfqvist are far<br />
greater than <strong>the</strong> closure durations <strong>in</strong> our CSw data. This is almost cer-<br />
– 136 –