Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

most of the remaining instances he produces an voiced approximant and not a tap. y k Figure 4–22. Subj. FS: […nog] kyrka [vad] ‘…probably a church, right?’ – 134 – s p Figure 4–23. Subj. MP: [som] snörper a[v…] ‘which closes up…’ Postaspiration duration (measured as mVOT, see section 4.1.2) of postsonorant stops seems to be similar to that in postvocalic contexts. Thus it ranges between 10–40 ms. Generally, the perceptual impression of the release is that of a lenis stop rather than a fortis stop. 4.2.4 Comparison of word-initial and word-medial stops In section 4.2.2.2, results of measurements of postaspiration duration in word-initial fortis stops were discussed. In this section, we compare those findings with those on postaspiration duration in word-medial fortis stops discussed in section 4.2.3.3. The relevant data are displayed in Table 4–9. For all subjects, postaspiration is considerably longer in word-initial fortis stops (i.e. in tennis, till and taverna type words) than in wordmedial fortis stops (båten and vatten type words). This applies irrespective of stress, i.e. tennis and till type words (in which a stressed vowel follows the stop) have similar postaspiration duration as taverna type words (in which an unstressed vowel follows the stop). The latter thus have much longer postaspirations than do word-medial fortis stops that occur before lexically unstressed vowels (båten and vatten types).

Table 4–9. Mean postaspiration duration (in ms; measured as mVOT) of wordinitial and word-medial fortis stops for all four CSw subjects. The words in the leftmost column refer to word types, as explained in the text. GT CK MP FS Po n Po n Po n Po n tennis 44 17 52 43 46 67 58 66 till 38 23 45 38 37 71 50 50 taverna 58 4 40 5 44 16 55 11 båten 27 23 23 31 28 83 32 52 vatten 20 19 21 32 29 37 28 46 These results are similar to those obtained by Löfqvist (1976; see also Löfqvist 1981), who studied the durational characteristics of read nonsense words in frame sentences spoken by 4 Swedish subjects with differing dialectal backgrounds. Table 4–10. An excerpt from Löfqvist’s (1976) findings on occlusion and aspiration duration in nonsense words spoken by 4 Swedish subjects. The equivalent word type categories used for the data in Table 4–9 are given within parentheses. Occl. dur. Postasp. dur. # CV ( tennis) 138 47 # CV ( taverna) 127 32 # VC ( båten) 171–188 15–16 1 An excerpt of Löfqvist’s (1976) findings is presented in Table 4–10. Löfqvist found that fortis stops in word-initial position before a stressed vowel (comparable to our tennis type category) had a mean postaspiration duration of 47 ms. Word-medial stops following a stressed vowel (comparable to our båten type) had a mean postaspiration duration of only 15–16 ms. Word-initial stops before a lexically unstressed vowel 1 Löfqvist separates the nonsense words with this syllable structure into two types, depending on whether they are produced with accent 1 (acute) or accent 2 (grave). Occlusion durations differ somewhat between the two categories: 171 ms for accent 1; 188 ms for accent 2. Aspiration durations are almost identical, though: 16 ms for accent 1; 15 ms for accent 2. – 135 –

Table 4–9. Mean postaspiration duration (<strong>in</strong> ms; measured as mVOT) of word<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

<strong>and</strong> word-medial fortis stops for all four CSw subjects. The words <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

leftmost column refer to word types, as expla<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> text.<br />

GT CK MP FS<br />

Po n Po n Po n Po n<br />

tennis 44 17 52 43 46 67 58 66<br />

till 38 23 45 38 37 71 50 50<br />

taverna 58 4 40 5 44 16 55 11<br />

båten 27 23 23 31 28 83 32 52<br />

vatten 20 19 21 32 29 37 28 46<br />

These results are similar to those obta<strong>in</strong>ed by Löfqvist (1976; see<br />

also Löfqvist 1981), who studied <strong>the</strong> durational characteristics of read<br />

nonsense words <strong>in</strong> frame sentences spoken by 4 Swedish subjects with<br />

differ<strong>in</strong>g dialectal backgrounds.<br />

Table 4–10. An excerpt from Löfqvist’s (1976) f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs on occlusion <strong>and</strong><br />

aspiration duration <strong>in</strong> nonsense words spoken by 4 Swedish subjects. The<br />

equivalent word type categories used for <strong>the</strong> data <strong>in</strong> Table 4–9 are given with<strong>in</strong><br />

paren<strong>the</strong>ses.<br />

Occl. dur. Postasp. dur.<br />

# CV ( tennis) 138 47<br />

# CV ( taverna) 127 32<br />

# VC ( båten) 171–188 15–16 1<br />

An excerpt of Löfqvist’s (1976) f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs is presented <strong>in</strong> Table 4–10.<br />

Löfqvist found that fortis stops <strong>in</strong> word-<strong>in</strong>itial position before a stressed<br />

vowel (comparable to our tennis type category) had a mean postaspiration<br />

duration of 47 ms. Word-medial stops follow<strong>in</strong>g a stressed vowel<br />

(comparable to our båten type) had a mean postaspiration duration of<br />

only 15–16 ms. Word-<strong>in</strong>itial stops before a lexically unstressed vowel<br />

1 Löfqvist separates <strong>the</strong> nonsense words with this syllable structure <strong>in</strong>to two types, depend<strong>in</strong>g<br />

on whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong>y are produced with accent 1 (acute) or accent 2 (grave). Occlusion<br />

durations differ somewhat between <strong>the</strong> two categories: 171 ms for accent 1;<br />

188 ms for accent 2. Aspiration durations are almost identical, though: 16 ms for<br />

accent 1; 15 ms for accent 2.<br />

– 135 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!