Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
noise becomes audibly postalveolar in character, which can be seen as a compromise between the places of articulation of the vowel and the stop. Likewise, in CK’s production of sticker ‘juts out’ (Figure 4–12) a period of breathy voice is followed by palatal friction, as one might expect in the context of a sequence of a close front vowel and a prevelar stop. In Figures 4–13 and 4–14, we see examples of bilabial friction in FS’s production of the words tupp ‘rooster’ and hjortarna ‘the deer (pl.)’. In the first case, the friction can be attributed to the combined effect of rounding and the imminent bilabial closure. In the second case, involving a postalveolar stop closure, the labiality is due only to the rounding of the vowel. p i Figure 4–17. Subj. MP: […den] djupa viken o[ch…] ‘…the deep bay and…’ As we saw in the durational analysis, GT and MP tend not to preaspirate fortis stops to the same degree as do CK and FS. Nevertheless, the voice offset preceding a fortis stop can be a correlate of the fortis vs. lenis distinction in their speech. This can be seen by comparing MP’s production of a fortis stop in Figure 4–15 and a lenis stop in Figure 4–16. In Figure 4–15, the glottis appears to start spreading approximately 25 ms before the oral closure, and one can detect a slight breathiness just before the closure is made. This is in contrast with the transition between vowel and stop in Figure 4–16, in which the vowel retains full modal voice throughout its production. The presence of this slightly early voice – 130 –
offset is perceptually salient when contrasted with a vowel with full modal voice. All the CSw subjects tend to produce friction in the transition phase between a close front vowel and an occlusion. In Figure 4–17, MP produces the sequence djupa viken ‘deep bay.’ In the first word, there is a rapid voice offset before the stop closure that does not cause any breathiness in the vowel. In the second word, the narrow escape channel of the close front vowel causes a friction noise to be produced before the closure of the prevelar stop. The narrow escape channel causes air velocity to increase, which facilitates voice offset. Thus a brief interval of breathiness may be present, which is obscured by the friction noise. It should be noted that such intervals of voiced friction count as preaspiration in the measurements of the CSw data. 4.2.3.5 Postsonorant fortis stops In the CSw data, fortis stops in word-medial, postsonorant position (e.g. in words such as valpar ‘puppies,’ vinter ‘winter’ and björk ‘birch’) are fairly rare. Sequences of nasal + fortis stop are the most common, and the data contain a total of 66 such occurrences in stressed syllables in content words (see Table 4–8). Data from the function words inte ‘not’ and sånt ‘such things’ are not included. For lateral + fortis stop sequences, there are 39 such occurrences (here the function word alltså ‘so, that is’ and the phrase helt enkelt ‘simply’ are excluded). For r-sound + fortis stop there are 21 such occurrences in the data (there are no function words in the data with such sequences). Table 4–8. Frequency of occurrence of sonorant + fortis stop sequences occurring after stressed vowel in content words for the four CSw subjects. Sequences of r-sound + fortis stop do not include /rt/ sequences, which are instead treated as postalveolar stops. GT CK MP FS Total Nasal + fortis stop 8 20 20 18 66 Lateral + fortis stop 6 12 10 11 39 R-sound + fortis stop 1 3 11 6 21 Total 15 35 41 35 126 – 131 –
- Page 92 and 93: do occur systematic linguistic diff
- Page 94 and 95: Gräsö Forsmark Valö S W E D E N
- Page 96 and 97: There are very few examples of clus
- Page 98 and 99: Kökar, in the Åboland archipelago
- Page 100 and 101: one hand, speakers have a tendency
- Page 102 and 103: ecent studies that corroborate thes
- Page 104 and 105: example, in a particular dialect, t
- Page 106 and 107: does not give her segmentation crit
- Page 108 and 109: Scotland and Ireland 1 [hphthk] 2 [
- Page 110 and 111: approximately 140-150 ms in VC syll
- Page 112 and 113: 1. South Saami (Southern & Ume Saam
- Page 114 and 115: 1987a), Estonian (Engstrand & Krull
- Page 116 and 117: Table 3-13. Reflexes of ON postvoca
- Page 118 and 119: and Tórshavn Faroese data were eli
- Page 120 and 121: ducing breathiness into the voice q
- Page 122 and 123: Figure 4-3. An example of a sequenc
- Page 124 and 125: 4.2 Central Standard Swedish (CSw)
- Page 126 and 127: very large, since postaspiration wa
- Page 128 and 129: Several spectrographic examples of
- Page 130 and 131: The data indicate that there is lit
- Page 132 and 133: produced and in 9 cases there were
- Page 134 and 135: To examine effects of syllable stru
- Page 136 and 137: preaspiration for lexically stresse
- Page 138 and 139: durations exceeding 120 ms, preaspi
- Page 140 and 141: mately 70 ms. Just before the stop
- Page 144 and 145: As regards nasal + fortis stop sequ
- Page 146 and 147: most of the remaining instances he
- Page 148 and 149: (comparable to our taverna type) ha
- Page 150 and 151: The CSw data have shown that word-i
- Page 152 and 153: golf ‘golf,’ in which the utter
- Page 154 and 155: o Figure 4-35. Subj. GT: […tv]
- Page 156 and 157: word-initial lenis stop preceded by
- Page 158 and 159: (i.e., short mVOffT and long mVOT).
- Page 160 and 161: make it easier to refer to stops in
- Page 162 and 163: [mh] ‘food’ is used, and for fu
- Page 164 and 165: clear stop correlate, 26 (7%) had a
- Page 166 and 167: All subjects considered, for lenis
- Page 168 and 169: Figure 4-45(a) plots preaspiration
- Page 170 and 171: cluster and 2 instances with a kt c
- Page 172 and 173: 4.3.2.5 Postaspiration duration Ins
- Page 174 and 175: closure gesture. As the escape chan
- Page 176 and 177: fricative constriction cannot be at
- Page 178 and 179: is glottal during the first 50 ms.
- Page 180 and 181: 4.3.4 Summary and discussion As reg
- Page 182 and 183: from the preaspiration noise itself
- Page 184 and 185: Many instances of word-medial forti
- Page 186 and 187: In the Gräsö dialect, the sonoran
- Page 188 and 189: that the presence of a voiceless na
- Page 190 and 191: of this type as well. Remarkably, t
offset is perceptually salient when contrasted with a vowel with full<br />
modal voice.<br />
All <strong>the</strong> CSw subjects tend to produce friction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> transition phase<br />
between a close front vowel <strong>and</strong> an occlusion. In Figure 4–17, MP produces<br />
<strong>the</strong> sequence djupa viken ‘deep bay.’ In <strong>the</strong> first word, <strong>the</strong>re is a<br />
rapid voice offset before <strong>the</strong> stop closure that does not cause any breath<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vowel. In <strong>the</strong> second word, <strong>the</strong> narrow escape channel of <strong>the</strong><br />
close front vowel causes a friction noise to be produced before <strong>the</strong> closure<br />
of <strong>the</strong> prevelar stop. The narrow escape channel causes air velocity<br />
to <strong>in</strong>crease, which facilitates voice offset. Thus a brief <strong>in</strong>terval of breath<strong>in</strong>ess<br />
may be present, which is obscured by <strong>the</strong> friction noise. It should be<br />
noted that such <strong>in</strong>tervals of voiced friction count as preaspiration <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
measurements of <strong>the</strong> CSw data.<br />
4.2.3.5 Postsonorant fortis stops<br />
In <strong>the</strong> CSw data, fortis stops <strong>in</strong> word-medial, postsonorant position<br />
(e.g. <strong>in</strong> words such as valpar ‘puppies,’ v<strong>in</strong>ter ‘w<strong>in</strong>ter’ <strong>and</strong> björk ‘birch’)<br />
are fairly rare. Sequences of nasal + fortis stop are <strong>the</strong> most common,<br />
<strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> data conta<strong>in</strong> a total of 66 such occurrences <strong>in</strong> stressed syllables <strong>in</strong><br />
content words (see Table 4–8). Data from <strong>the</strong> function words <strong>in</strong>te ‘not’<br />
<strong>and</strong> sånt ‘such th<strong>in</strong>gs’ are not <strong>in</strong>cluded. For lateral + fortis stop<br />
sequences, <strong>the</strong>re are 39 such occurrences (here <strong>the</strong> function word alltså<br />
‘so, that is’ <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> phrase helt enkelt ‘simply’ are excluded). For r-sound<br />
+ fortis stop <strong>the</strong>re are 21 such occurrences <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> data (<strong>the</strong>re are no<br />
function words <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> data with such sequences).<br />
Table 4–8. Frequency of occurrence of sonorant + fortis stop sequences<br />
occurr<strong>in</strong>g after stressed vowel <strong>in</strong> content words for <strong>the</strong> four CSw subjects.<br />
Sequences of r-sound + fortis stop do not <strong>in</strong>clude /rt/ sequences, which are<br />
<strong>in</strong>stead treated as postalveolar stops.<br />
GT CK MP FS Total<br />
Nasal + fortis stop 8 20 20 18 66<br />
Lateral + fortis stop 6 12 10 11 39<br />
R-sound + fortis stop 1 3 11 6 21<br />
Total 15 35 41 35 126<br />
– 131 –