Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
same data as <strong>the</strong> results presented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section, <strong>the</strong> durations<br />
of vowel, preaspiration <strong>and</strong> occlusion are very similar to those <strong>in</strong> Table<br />
4–5. These durations will not be discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r here.<br />
From Table 4–7 it appears that postaspiration duration is much more<br />
constant than is preaspiration duration (i.e., has lower st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations)<br />
<strong>and</strong> is also less variable between word types. For båten type<br />
words, mean postaspiration duration for <strong>the</strong> different <strong>in</strong>formants ranges<br />
from 23 to 32 ms, <strong>and</strong> for vatten type words from 20 to 29 ms. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />
figures for preaspiration are 6–30 ms <strong>and</strong> 12–37 ms. Also, differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> mean postaspiration duration between subjects are fairly<br />
small <strong>in</strong> comparison to preaspiration duration.<br />
4.2.3.4 Phonetic variation <strong>in</strong> word-medial fortis stops<br />
In previous sections, we have seen that various types of friction are<br />
associated with <strong>the</strong> production of preaspiration. In Faroese, for example<br />
(see section 4.3.3), beyond glottal friction, both place of stop articulation<br />
<strong>and</strong> maximal vowel constriction constitute potential sources of friction <strong>in</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> production of preaspiration. This friction seems to be an active enhancement<br />
of <strong>the</strong> preaspiration noise, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a fortuitous effect or<br />
by-product of speech production.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> CSw data, <strong>the</strong> subjects who preaspirate also tend to produce<br />
friction that can be associated with <strong>the</strong> place of <strong>the</strong> stop closure. However,<br />
<strong>the</strong>se subjects do not seem to produce <strong>the</strong> type of friction that can<br />
be associated with maximal dorsal constriction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vowel, as <strong>in</strong> Faroese.<br />
Also, <strong>the</strong> friction produced by <strong>the</strong> CSw subjects does not seem to be<br />
enhanced or prolonged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> speech of <strong>the</strong> Faroese<br />
subjects.<br />
In <strong>the</strong> CSw data, preaspirations that occur after open <strong>and</strong> mid vowels<br />
are characterised by mostly glottal friction, with only slight friction orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />
at <strong>the</strong> place of articulation for <strong>the</strong> stop. This is exemplified by <strong>the</strong><br />
production of FS (Figure 4–9) <strong>and</strong> CK (Figure 4–10) of <strong>the</strong> word vattnet<br />
‘<strong>the</strong> water.’ In FS’s case, modal voice offset occurs approximately 45 ms<br />
before full voice offset. Noise spreads gradually down through <strong>the</strong> vowel<br />
spectrum, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> glottis is spread<strong>in</strong>g fairly slowly as it opens.<br />
The time lag between full voice offset <strong>and</strong> onset of stop closure is approximately<br />
30 ms. The total preaspiration duration is <strong>the</strong>refore approxi-<br />
– 127 –