26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

same data as <strong>the</strong> results presented <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section, <strong>the</strong> durations<br />

of vowel, preaspiration <strong>and</strong> occlusion are very similar to those <strong>in</strong> Table<br />

4–5. These durations will not be discussed fur<strong>the</strong>r here.<br />

From Table 4–7 it appears that postaspiration duration is much more<br />

constant than is preaspiration duration (i.e., has lower st<strong>and</strong>ard deviations)<br />

<strong>and</strong> is also less variable between word types. For båten type<br />

words, mean postaspiration duration for <strong>the</strong> different <strong>in</strong>formants ranges<br />

from 23 to 32 ms, <strong>and</strong> for vatten type words from 20 to 29 ms. The correspond<strong>in</strong>g<br />

figures for preaspiration are 6–30 ms <strong>and</strong> 12–37 ms. Also, differences<br />

<strong>in</strong> mean postaspiration duration between subjects are fairly<br />

small <strong>in</strong> comparison to preaspiration duration.<br />

4.2.3.4 Phonetic variation <strong>in</strong> word-medial fortis stops<br />

In previous sections, we have seen that various types of friction are<br />

associated with <strong>the</strong> production of preaspiration. In Faroese, for example<br />

(see section 4.3.3), beyond glottal friction, both place of stop articulation<br />

<strong>and</strong> maximal vowel constriction constitute potential sources of friction <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> production of preaspiration. This friction seems to be an active enhancement<br />

of <strong>the</strong> preaspiration noise, ra<strong>the</strong>r than a fortuitous effect or<br />

by-product of speech production.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> CSw data, <strong>the</strong> subjects who preaspirate also tend to produce<br />

friction that can be associated with <strong>the</strong> place of <strong>the</strong> stop closure. However,<br />

<strong>the</strong>se subjects do not seem to produce <strong>the</strong> type of friction that can<br />

be associated with maximal dorsal constriction <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> vowel, as <strong>in</strong> Faroese.<br />

Also, <strong>the</strong> friction produced by <strong>the</strong> CSw subjects does not seem to be<br />

enhanced or prolonged <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> same way as <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> speech of <strong>the</strong> Faroese<br />

subjects.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> CSw data, preaspirations that occur after open <strong>and</strong> mid vowels<br />

are characterised by mostly glottal friction, with only slight friction orig<strong>in</strong>at<strong>in</strong>g<br />

at <strong>the</strong> place of articulation for <strong>the</strong> stop. This is exemplified by <strong>the</strong><br />

production of FS (Figure 4–9) <strong>and</strong> CK (Figure 4–10) of <strong>the</strong> word vattnet<br />

‘<strong>the</strong> water.’ In FS’s case, modal voice offset occurs approximately 45 ms<br />

before full voice offset. Noise spreads gradually down through <strong>the</strong> vowel<br />

spectrum, <strong>in</strong>dicat<strong>in</strong>g that <strong>the</strong> glottis is spread<strong>in</strong>g fairly slowly as it opens.<br />

The time lag between full voice offset <strong>and</strong> onset of stop closure is approximately<br />

30 ms. The total preaspiration duration is <strong>the</strong>refore approxi-<br />

– 127 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!