26.07.2013 Views

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Several spectrographic examples of postaspirated stops are given <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> follow<strong>in</strong>g section on preaspiration <strong>and</strong> sonorant devoic<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> word<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

fortis stops.<br />

4.2.2.3 <strong>Preaspiration</strong> duration <strong>and</strong> sonorant voicelessness<br />

The data on preaspiration before word-<strong>in</strong>itial fortis stops <strong>in</strong> Central<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard Swedish (CSw) are a subset of <strong>the</strong> data on word-<strong>in</strong>itial fortis<br />

stops analysed <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> preced<strong>in</strong>g section. In all, 147 occurrences of postvocalic,<br />

word-<strong>in</strong>itial fortis stops were analysed (<strong>the</strong>se are found <strong>in</strong><br />

sequences such as bara tittar, jag kommer, med palmer) 1 . Of <strong>the</strong>se, 38<br />

were from subject CK, 18 from GT, 45 from MP <strong>and</strong> 46 from FS.<br />

The data <strong>in</strong>dicate that for three of <strong>the</strong> four speakers, CK, GT <strong>and</strong><br />

MP, <strong>the</strong>re was almost no tendency for preaspiration before word-<strong>in</strong>itial<br />

fortis stops. FS had a slight preaspiration before such stops <strong>in</strong> 21 of <strong>the</strong><br />

46 occurrences, usually consist<strong>in</strong>g of a breathy voice offset rang<strong>in</strong>g<br />

between approximately 10–35 ms. Thus, although a slight tendency to<br />

preaspirate such stops was observed, it was not <strong>the</strong> dom<strong>in</strong>ant pattern, <strong>and</strong><br />

was hardly noticeable <strong>in</strong> auditory analysis when it did occur.<br />

v h h <br />

Figure 4–5. Subj. FS: […] vi till<br />

täl[tet…] ‘…we (come) to <strong>the</strong> tent…’<br />

1 In some function words, word-f<strong>in</strong>al consonants are almost never realised <strong>in</strong> spontaneous<br />

speech. For example, <strong>the</strong> first person pronoun jag is typically pronounced as [j]<br />

or [j] <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> preposition med ‘with’ is pronounced as [m] or [m], even when <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g word beg<strong>in</strong>s with a vowel. Therefore, <strong>the</strong>se are treated as not hav<strong>in</strong>g a f<strong>in</strong>al<br />

consonant <strong>in</strong> this analysis.<br />

– 116 –<br />

h <br />

Figure 4–6. Subj. FS: […] här<br />

tenn[is] ‘…here tennis’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!