Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ... Preaspiration in the Nordic Languages: Synchronic and Diachronic ...

www2.lingfil.uu.se
from www2.lingfil.uu.se More from this publisher
26.07.2013 Views

very large, since postaspiration was approximately only 7–9 ms shorter on average in till type (i.e., function) words than in tennis type (i.e., content) words. 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 GT CK MP FS Figure 4–4. The range of postaspiration durations for word-initial fortis stops for the four CSw subjects. 1 The mean postaspiration duration of initial stops in taverna type words was slightly shorter than in tennis type words for 3 of the 4 subjects, but t-tests do not indicate that the differences are significant. The difference was even smaller than that observed between the tennis type and the till type words (i.e., content vs. function words). It should be noted that there are far fewer tokens for the taverna type words than for the other categories, which affects the significance in the t-tests. There were also differences in mean postaspiration duration between subjects. For tennis type words, subject FS had the highest mean, 58 ms. GT and MP had similar mean durations, 46 and 44 ms respectively. CK 1 The notched box shows the median (central line) and the lower and upper quartiles (lower and upper box boundaries). The box thus comprises 50% of the observed data. The notched area shows the confidence interval around the median. The dotted-line (i.e. whisker) connects the nearest observations within 1.5 IQRs (inter-quartile ranges) of the lower and upper quartiles. The vertical line to the left of the box shows the 90% percentile range. The diamond in that line shows the mean and the 95% confidence interval around the mean. Crosses (+) and circles () indicate outliers, observations more than 1.5 IQRs (near outliers) and 3.0 IQRs (far outliers) from the quartiles. – 114 –

had an intermediate mean of 52 ms. For till type words, this pattern is repeated. FS had the highest mean, 50 ms, GT and MP had the lowest, 38 ms and 37 ms respectively, and CK had an intermediate mean of 45 ms. Table 4–2. Mean postaspiration duration (Po), in ms, for word-initial fortis stops in three different word groups (see text) and for all four CSw subjects. Standard deviations are given within parentheses and the number of tokens in italics. GT CK MP FS Po n Po n Po n Po n tennis 44 (18) 17 52 (11) 43 46 (14) 67 58 (14) 66 till 38 (13) 23 45 (13) 38 37 (14) 71 50 (19) 50 taverna 58 (20) 4 40 (6) 5 44 (13) 16 55 (11) 11 An analysis of the relationship of stop closure duration and postaspiration duration did not reveal any correlation between the two. This is perhaps not surprising, since stop closure duration varies greatly in the present data. One source for this variability is the fact that the context preceding the stops may contain any type of segment, a vowel, a sonorant, a stop or a fricative. Also, since the data are from unscripted (spontaneous) speech, factors such as prominence and speech rate are not controlled for. As a result, closure durations range from being practically absent (which can occur when a word-final nasal precedes a word-initial stop) to extending to several hundred ms. The data do not indicate that there are systematic differences in mean postaspiration duration between the different places of articulation (labial, dental and velar). Again, this is perhaps to be expected, since the material is from spontaneous speech and thus, for example, the number of tokens for each stop category, their stress conditions etc. are not controlled for. Analysis of the stop types with a further breakdown of the material (e.g., into content and function words) does not yield statistically valid results, since each category has such a small number of tokens. These data are therefore not very useful in examining the possible differences in the duration of closure and aspiration between different places of articulation. – 115 –

very large, s<strong>in</strong>ce postaspiration was approximately only 7–9 ms shorter<br />

on average <strong>in</strong> till type (i.e., function) words than <strong>in</strong> tennis type (i.e.,<br />

content) words.<br />

140<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

GT CK MP FS<br />

Figure 4–4. The range of postaspiration durations for word-<strong>in</strong>itial fortis stops<br />

for <strong>the</strong> four CSw subjects. 1<br />

The mean postaspiration duration of <strong>in</strong>itial stops <strong>in</strong> taverna type<br />

words was slightly shorter than <strong>in</strong> tennis type words for 3 of <strong>the</strong> 4<br />

subjects, but t-tests do not <strong>in</strong>dicate that <strong>the</strong> differences are significant.<br />

The difference was even smaller than that observed between <strong>the</strong> tennis<br />

type <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> till type words (i.e., content vs. function words). It should be<br />

noted that <strong>the</strong>re are far fewer tokens for <strong>the</strong> taverna type words than for<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r categories, which affects <strong>the</strong> significance <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> t-tests.<br />

There were also differences <strong>in</strong> mean postaspiration duration between<br />

subjects. For tennis type words, subject FS had <strong>the</strong> highest mean, 58 ms.<br />

GT <strong>and</strong> MP had similar mean durations, 46 <strong>and</strong> 44 ms respectively. CK<br />

1 The notched box shows <strong>the</strong> median (central l<strong>in</strong>e) <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>and</strong> upper quartiles<br />

(lower <strong>and</strong> upper box boundaries). The box thus comprises 50% of <strong>the</strong> observed data.<br />

The notched area shows <strong>the</strong> confidence <strong>in</strong>terval around <strong>the</strong> median. The dotted-l<strong>in</strong>e<br />

(i.e. whisker) connects <strong>the</strong> nearest observations with<strong>in</strong> 1.5 IQRs (<strong>in</strong>ter-quartile ranges)<br />

of <strong>the</strong> lower <strong>and</strong> upper quartiles. The vertical l<strong>in</strong>e to <strong>the</strong> left of <strong>the</strong> box shows <strong>the</strong> 90%<br />

percentile range. The diamond <strong>in</strong> that l<strong>in</strong>e shows <strong>the</strong> mean <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> 95% confidence<br />

<strong>in</strong>terval around <strong>the</strong> mean. Crosses (+) <strong>and</strong> circles () <strong>in</strong>dicate outliers, observations<br />

more than 1.5 IQRs (near outliers) <strong>and</strong> 3.0 IQRs (far outliers) from <strong>the</strong> quartiles.<br />

– 114 –

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!