26.07.2013 Views

APPLYING THERMOECONOMICS TO THE ANALYSIS OF ... - circe

APPLYING THERMOECONOMICS TO THE ANALYSIS OF ... - circe

APPLYING THERMOECONOMICS TO THE ANALYSIS OF ... - circe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 1. Fuel-Product Table of the food chain (GJ)<br />

0 F 1 F 2 F 3 F 4<br />

F 5<br />

F Total<br />

P0 80 7 15 13.5 0 115.5<br />

P1 0 0 60 0 0 0 60<br />

P2 5 0 0 51.5 3.5 0 60<br />

P3 0 0 0 0 0 1.9 1.9<br />

P4 0 0 0 0 0 3.1 3.1<br />

P5 3.6 0 0 0 0 0 3.6<br />

Total 8.6 80 67 66.5 17 5<br />

Equations (3) and (5) allow computing the production cost. These equations could be also used to decompose the<br />

costs considering the different types of resources. The resource cost vector can be separated into two parts:<br />

fossil biomass<br />

fossil<br />

C0 = C0 + C 0 , where the cost due to fossil fuels in terms of energy resources is C 0 = (0, E02, E03, E04,0)<br />

, and<br />

biomass<br />

the cost due to biomass is C 0 = ( E01,0,0,0,0)<br />

, therefore the production cost due to fossil fuel could be computed as:<br />

fossil<br />

CP= *<br />

P<br />

fossil<br />

C0<br />

(8)<br />

and in the same way the production cost due to biomass is:<br />

biomass<br />

CP= *<br />

P<br />

biomass<br />

C0<br />

(9)<br />

Similar expressions could be used to compute the unitary production cost.<br />

Table 2. Efficiency and production costs of the processes for the base case<br />

Fossil Fuels Biomass Total<br />

Process κ P c (GJ/GJ) P C (GJ) P c (GJ/GJ) P C (GJ) P c (GJ/GJ) C P (GJ)<br />

1 1.33 0.00 0.00 1.33 80.00 1.33 80.00<br />

2 1.12 0.12 7.00 1.33 80.00 1.45 87.00<br />

3 35.00 11.06 21.01 36.14 68.67 47.20 89.68<br />

4 5.48 4.49 13.91 1.51 4.67 5.99 18.58<br />

5 1.39 9.70 34.92 20.37 73.33 30.07 108.25<br />

Total 13.43 35.50 80.00 115.50<br />

In table 2 the efficiency values of each system process are shown. The ratio of the total fossil fuel required per<br />

fossil<br />

calorie consumed is approximately 10:1 ( c P,5<br />

= 9.70 ), a clear indicator of the high inefficiency of the current food<br />

chain. Also note that the production of meat (process 3) requires 2.5 times more fossil energy resources (11.06 vs. 4.49)<br />

than the vegetal production (process 4). By far, the most inefficient process (identified by κ ) is the production of meat.<br />

Starting with the base case we will analyze several scenarios, in order to demonstrate the capabilities of the<br />

thermoeconomic approach for the evaluation of the environmental impact of the food system, and for the identification<br />

of potential improvements.<br />

3.2 Recycling biomass residues<br />

Our aim now is to identify and quantify possible optimization options of the food chain system. In the first scenario,<br />

we are going to analyze the effect of recycling 10% of crop residues (2 GJ) and reusing them as fuel in the next process.<br />

The unit consumption of the first process is reduced to κ 1 = 1.29 and the external resources of the second process to<br />

C 02 = 5. We assume that the distribution ratios and the final demand of the system do not change.<br />

Using Eqn. (3) it is possible to compute the production costs. Since biomass energy and the cost distribution matrix<br />

*<br />

P does not change, the production costs due to biomass do not change either.<br />

890

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!