25.07.2013 Views

CHARACTERIZATION OF A BIOMASS MILLING PILOT ... - circe

CHARACTERIZATION OF A BIOMASS MILLING PILOT ... - circe

CHARACTERIZATION OF A BIOMASS MILLING PILOT ... - circe

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Input and output temperature measurement of air and<br />

biomass allow to assess the heat flow spent in<br />

temperature increase.<br />

3.2.2 Input and output air humidity and biomass<br />

moisture content<br />

Moisture content is analyzed by means of initial and<br />

final biomass representative sampling [15]. Input and<br />

output air humidity are also instrumented.<br />

Water evaporation flow per mass unity is calculated<br />

considering the difference between input and output<br />

moisture content of biomass.<br />

On the other side, it is necessary to know the initial<br />

air humidity to assess the heat flow to increase the water<br />

vapour temperature.<br />

3.2.3 Biomass feed rate and air mass flow<br />

An average biomass feed rate is calculated as ratio<br />

between total raw biomass weigtht and the measured<br />

feeding time.<br />

Air volumetric flow is instrumented with an annubar<br />

flowmeter located in a pipe stretch in ausence of<br />

particles.<br />

4 MILLED <strong>BIOMASS</strong> SAMPLING<br />

Milling process characterization includes the analysis<br />

and influence of several variables and operational<br />

parameters in the final properties of milled biomass.<br />

First of all, different sampling methodologies to<br />

obtain a representative sample of the total comminuted<br />

biomass in milling experimental pilot plant are reviewed.<br />

4.1 Coning and quartering procedure.<br />

Once the total volume is milled, a representative<br />

sample can be obtained using the coning and quartering<br />

procedure. It is a progressive process, from the bulk<br />

volume (A) two quarters are taken (C and D) and they are<br />

divided into quarters again. The final sample is taken<br />

from the last one (G). The process is shown in figure 3.<br />

Figure 3: Coning and quartering procedure [16]<br />

It is a static sampling method where powder is<br />

confined or heaped. In this situation, size segregation<br />

occurs. Fine particles tend to remain at the center of the<br />

heap and coarse ones congregate at the periphery and the<br />

particle size analyse of the sample is disturbed.<br />

4.2 Gravity discharge sampling.<br />

Sampling from flowing powder such as discharging<br />

flow by gravity, the entire stream of powder should be<br />

sampled by traversing the stream, and the sampling<br />

should continue for a long series of short time intervals.<br />

The sampling point is located between cyclone outlet<br />

and screen classifier (e.g. Fig. 6, GS.1). Particles from<br />

grinders are conveyed until cyclone where are collected<br />

and precipitated to screen classifier. Two-way distributor<br />

(e.g. Fig. 4) has been introduced between both<br />

equipments to change the direction flow on discharge to<br />

the sampling outlet.<br />

This sampling method is simple, economic and<br />

allows taking a representative sample of collected<br />

biomass in cyclone. However, finer particles not<br />

collected by cyclone are not represented in this sample.<br />

Figure 4: Two-way distributor<br />

4.3 Isokinetic sampling<br />

The principal standard for direct measurement of<br />

local particle mass flux in most gas-solid flows is<br />

provided by the isokinetic sampling system. The<br />

isokinetic sampling principle requires that the sampling<br />

probe which is aligned with the flow (isoaxial) extracts<br />

airborne particulates at the sampling velocity matching<br />

the original undisturbed local flow velocity.<br />

In practice, the isokinetic sampling is closely<br />

approached but almost impossible to be rigorously<br />

realized. Several problems as the determination of flow<br />

velocity in the presence of significant amount of<br />

particles, the elimination of intrusive effect of the<br />

sampling probe, the interactions between particles and<br />

carrying fluid, the loss of particles to the wall deposition<br />

and particle bounce/reentrainment in the sampling tube<br />

are frequently observed. By these reasons, three types of<br />

sampling (e.g. Fig. 5) can be carried out: isokinetic<br />

(sampling velocity=stream velocity) or two kind of<br />

anisokinetic sampling: over-sucking (sampling<br />

velocity>stream velocity), under-sucking (sampling<br />

velocity< stream velocity).<br />

Figure 5: Isokinetic and non-isokinetic sampling [17]

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!