the origin of daniel's four empires scheme re ... - Tyndale House
the origin of daniel's four empires scheme re ... - Tyndale House
the origin of daniel's four empires scheme re ... - Tyndale House
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LUCAS: Daniel's Four Empi<strong>re</strong>s Scheme 197<br />
contain quite a lot <strong>of</strong> early material, this is difficult to isolate<br />
from acc<strong>re</strong>tions that occur<strong>re</strong>d during <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> mainly oral<br />
transmission until it was written down in <strong>the</strong> third to sixth<br />
centuries AD, and also from additions and changes introduced in<br />
<strong>the</strong> ninth century, when <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong> was an upsurge <strong>of</strong> literary<br />
activity once <strong>the</strong> disruptions caused by <strong>the</strong> Arab invasion had<br />
subsided. For this <strong>re</strong>ason any attempt to <strong>re</strong>construct <strong>the</strong><br />
development <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrianism can produce only provisional<br />
<strong>re</strong>sults. A <strong>re</strong>cent detailed study is that <strong>of</strong> Boyce. She concludes<br />
that: 31<br />
The<strong>re</strong> is no trace in Zoroaster's own utterances <strong>of</strong> any fixed<br />
chronology, or any speculation about <strong>the</strong> world-age in which<br />
Frasho.Ke<strong>re</strong>ti will be brought to pass; but in <strong>the</strong> Gathas, as in <strong>the</strong><br />
Christian gospels, <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong> is a sense <strong>of</strong> urgency, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> things<br />
being at hand.<br />
Zoroaster spoke <strong>of</strong> 'th<strong>re</strong>e times': <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> C<strong>re</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong> time<br />
<strong>of</strong> mixtu<strong>re</strong> (<strong>the</strong> struggle between good and evil), and, following<br />
<strong>the</strong> Frasho.Ke<strong>re</strong>ti (<strong>the</strong> 'making wonderful' in which c<strong>re</strong>ation is<br />
<strong>re</strong>sto<strong>re</strong>d to its <strong>origin</strong>al perfect state), Eternity, which was later<br />
called <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Separation because <strong>the</strong>n good is separated<br />
from evil for ever. A detailed chronology seems to have come<br />
into being only with <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zurvanites, a sect that<br />
appea<strong>re</strong>d in late Achaemenian times. The earliest datable<br />
<strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>nce to <strong>the</strong>m is a fragment <strong>of</strong> Theopompos (<strong>four</strong>th century<br />
BC) p<strong>re</strong>served by Plutarch. 32 It is generally believed that<br />
Zurvanism was influenced by Babylonian astrology, especially<br />
by its speculations about <strong>re</strong>cur<strong>re</strong>nt 'g<strong>re</strong>at years' that <strong>re</strong>peat<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves throughout time. The Zurvanites believed in a<br />
‘world-year' divided into periods <strong>of</strong> 1,000 years. The texts<br />
vary as to <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world-year. Some give it as 9,000<br />
years (th<strong>re</strong>e times th<strong>re</strong>e being a favou<strong>re</strong>d number in<br />
Zoroastrianism), o<strong>the</strong>rs as 12,000 years (cor<strong>re</strong>sponding to <strong>the</strong><br />
twelve months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calendar year). Boyce 33 thinks that<br />
_________________________<br />
31<br />
Boyce, History <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrianism I 233. What follows summarizes <strong>the</strong><br />
discussion on 229-46.<br />
32<br />
Plutarch, Isis and Osiris 47. For <strong>the</strong> G<strong>re</strong>ek text and an English translation<br />
see F. C. Babbit (ed.), Plutarch: Moralia V (Tondon, Loeb 1984) 115.<br />
33<br />
Boyce, History <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrianism II 231ff., discusses Zurvanism.