25.07.2013 Views

the origin of daniel's four empires scheme re ... - Tyndale House

the origin of daniel's four empires scheme re ... - Tyndale House

the origin of daniel's four empires scheme re ... - Tyndale House

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LUCAS: Daniel's Four Empi<strong>re</strong>s Scheme 197<br />

contain quite a lot <strong>of</strong> early material, this is difficult to isolate<br />

from acc<strong>re</strong>tions that occur<strong>re</strong>d during <strong>the</strong> period <strong>of</strong> mainly oral<br />

transmission until it was written down in <strong>the</strong> third to sixth<br />

centuries AD, and also from additions and changes introduced in<br />

<strong>the</strong> ninth century, when <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong> was an upsurge <strong>of</strong> literary<br />

activity once <strong>the</strong> disruptions caused by <strong>the</strong> Arab invasion had<br />

subsided. For this <strong>re</strong>ason any attempt to <strong>re</strong>construct <strong>the</strong><br />

development <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrianism can produce only provisional<br />

<strong>re</strong>sults. A <strong>re</strong>cent detailed study is that <strong>of</strong> Boyce. She concludes<br />

that: 31<br />

The<strong>re</strong> is no trace in Zoroaster's own utterances <strong>of</strong> any fixed<br />

chronology, or any speculation about <strong>the</strong> world-age in which<br />

Frasho.Ke<strong>re</strong>ti will be brought to pass; but in <strong>the</strong> Gathas, as in <strong>the</strong><br />

Christian gospels, <strong>the</strong><strong>re</strong> is a sense <strong>of</strong> urgency, <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> end <strong>of</strong> things<br />

being at hand.<br />

Zoroaster spoke <strong>of</strong> 'th<strong>re</strong>e times': <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> C<strong>re</strong>ation, <strong>the</strong> time<br />

<strong>of</strong> mixtu<strong>re</strong> (<strong>the</strong> struggle between good and evil), and, following<br />

<strong>the</strong> Frasho.Ke<strong>re</strong>ti (<strong>the</strong> 'making wonderful' in which c<strong>re</strong>ation is<br />

<strong>re</strong>sto<strong>re</strong>d to its <strong>origin</strong>al perfect state), Eternity, which was later<br />

called <strong>the</strong> time <strong>of</strong> Separation because <strong>the</strong>n good is separated<br />

from evil for ever. A detailed chronology seems to have come<br />

into being only with <strong>the</strong> rise <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Zurvanites, a sect that<br />

appea<strong>re</strong>d in late Achaemenian times. The earliest datable<br />

<strong>re</strong>fe<strong>re</strong>nce to <strong>the</strong>m is a fragment <strong>of</strong> Theopompos (<strong>four</strong>th century<br />

BC) p<strong>re</strong>served by Plutarch. 32 It is generally believed that<br />

Zurvanism was influenced by Babylonian astrology, especially<br />

by its speculations about <strong>re</strong>cur<strong>re</strong>nt 'g<strong>re</strong>at years' that <strong>re</strong>peat<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves throughout time. The Zurvanites believed in a<br />

‘world-year' divided into periods <strong>of</strong> 1,000 years. The texts<br />

vary as to <strong>the</strong> length <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> world-year. Some give it as 9,000<br />

years (th<strong>re</strong>e times th<strong>re</strong>e being a favou<strong>re</strong>d number in<br />

Zoroastrianism), o<strong>the</strong>rs as 12,000 years (cor<strong>re</strong>sponding to <strong>the</strong><br />

twelve months <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> calendar year). Boyce 33 thinks that<br />

_________________________<br />

31<br />

Boyce, History <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrianism I 233. What follows summarizes <strong>the</strong><br />

discussion on 229-46.<br />

32<br />

Plutarch, Isis and Osiris 47. For <strong>the</strong> G<strong>re</strong>ek text and an English translation<br />

see F. C. Babbit (ed.), Plutarch: Moralia V (Tondon, Loeb 1984) 115.<br />

33<br />

Boyce, History <strong>of</strong> Zoroastrianism II 231ff., discusses Zurvanism.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!