Download

Download Download

map.rks.gov.net
from map.rks.gov.net More from this publisher
25.07.2013 Views

Introduction This report contains findings and recommendations of the vertical functional review of the Kosovo Ministry of Health (MOH) conducted in the period of February to June 2009 as a part of the Functional Review and Institutional Design of Ministries (FRIDOM) project. The review involved interviewing many health sector personnel. The report has been reviewed by the Minister of Health and the new acting PS, but has not been circulated more widely within the MOH. Further work leading to the Institutional Development Plan should include thoroughly testing this report with MOH senior officials and others from the health sector. Note that the information on the organisational structure and the vacant positions was valid in April but will have changed. We requested up-to-date information on the position in June but did not have this information at the time this final version was prepared. This report has been prepared by the FRIDOM Project funded by the Department for International Development of the United Kingdom (UK) Government. We would like to thank the Minister of Health, the Deputy Minister of Health, and the Minister’s advisers for the advice provided, including the insights on the key issues facing the health sector. We would also like to thanks staff members from the MOH, the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), the Kosovo Medicines Agency, the Kosovo University Hospital Clinic, the Telemedicine Centre, the Registration and Licensing Board, the FRIDOM team members, the EC, the World Bank, UNICEF, WHO, the Ministry of Finance and others who contributed ideas and provided advice to contribute to this report. We would like to thank Mentor Sadiku and Diana Pacolli for their very supportive assistance with the arrangement of meetings in the MOH. The suggestions in the report do not necessarily represent the views of people interviewed, or the Department for International Development, or the UK Government. The review has been conducted by Qamile Ramadani and Lynne McKenzie. The review is set out in the following sections. Section I Legal, policy and medium term planning framework Section II Barriers to change Section III Overview of structure Section IV Corporate functions Section V Strategic management Section VI Secondary and tertiary services Section VII Pharmaceuticals Section VIII Public health services Section IX Primary health services Section X Mental health services Section XI Health information, internal audit, licensing, inspection, special offices and committees Section XII Examples from other countries Section XIII New structure and current structure Appendices: Appendix A Abbreviations; Appendix B Review Methodology; Appendix C Legal Framework; Appendix D MTEF policy and planning priorities and strategic challenges for the MOH; Appendix E Staff numbers and budget 2009; Appendix F Organisation structure (current official one); and Appendix G Additional Advice in Response to Requests from the Minister of Health. 8

SECTION I: Legal, policy and medium term planning framework The legal framework for the health sector is described in Appendix C. There are significant changes being considered that will impact on the MOH, including the role of private and public providers and health insurance. Regardless of whether health insurance is adopted via the use of a Health Insurance Fund, the legal framework has requirements which need to be reviewed, including roles, responsibilities and reporting arrangements for many health sector institutions (see Appendix C). Advice on possible changes to the Health law was provided in response to a request from the Ministry of Health’s Working Group (see Appendix G). The draft Strategic Plan sets out a very challenging agenda of major changes in the health sector with far reaching implications for the MOH in terms of developing its role in policy, planning, monitoring and review. While it retains its responsibilities for the providers of public health, secondary and tertiary health, pharmaceuticals and mental health services, it carries considerable responsibilities for leading improvements in the providers of services in these areas. Appendix D provides an overview of the MTEF, the draft Health Sector Strategy, and some major policy issues affecting the structure of the MOH and other institutions in the health sector. SECTION II: Barriers to change There are many constraints on making changes to the structure, functions and operations of the MOH that need to be dealt with at the government level. The working arrangements and structure of the Ministry has evolved in response to issues such as the ones set out below. The method of setting pay levels is providing incentives to create divisions, centres, and agencies with many management positions. There are incentives for doctors and other technically skilled staff to be managers to get into the higher paid management positions. This reduces the breadth of other skills at senior levels. There is insufficient recognition in the civil service classifications and pay scales of the value of technicians in the public sector compared to managers. The proposals to change the Civil Service Law include four levels of civil servants with the top two being managers and the third level being professionals. Many officials are holding more than one position by being responsible for their usual position plus fulfilling an acting management role for a higher position. This situation can continue for some time with no active efforts to recruit vacant positions. Some contributing factors to this problem identified by officials include: rigid job structure; low funding levels resulting in multiple vacant positions that are being covered by one person; and narrow jobs resulting from government or donor policy decisions. Government-wide administrative instructions require a legal department, an information department, and other government requirements such as the European Integration Office; the Gender, Human Rights and Quality Office, etc. This results in many offices and positions with narrow roles and an inability to use these people for other priority work. It can overload a ministry with staff of lower priority, for example, the MOH is not filling some of the positions in the administrative instructions as it has more pressing needs in other areas. It also overloads the PS as many of these functions have to report to the PS according to the administrative instructions. The political situation and the civil service arrangements do not support an adequate level of continuity in ministers and PSs. There have been four ministers and six permanent secretaries since 2002. Many senior positions have staff in acting roles, including the PS. In these circumstances it is difficult to provide leadership for a sufficient period to design and implement necessary reforms. Government entities do not appear to be incentivised to consider contracting out options. For example, the Department of Pharmacy is refurbishing a government owned building instead of continuing to contract out the warehousing service. While there is an analysis of the comparative costs, this analysis does not ye4t cover the cost of owning the building and other assets. There is an opportunity cost to owning buildings and vehicles, maintenance including repairs and insurance costs, and depreciation costs. Some countries levy a capital 9

Introduction<br />

This report contains findings and recommendations of the vertical functional review of the Kosovo<br />

Ministry of Health (MOH) conducted in the period of February to June 2009 as a part of the<br />

Functional Review and Institutional Design of Ministries (FRIDOM) project.<br />

The review involved interviewing many health sector personnel. The report has been reviewed by<br />

the Minister of Health and the new acting PS, but has not been circulated more widely within the<br />

MOH. Further work leading to the Institutional Development Plan should include thoroughly testing<br />

this report with MOH senior officials and others from the health sector.<br />

Note that the information on the organisational structure and the vacant positions was valid in April<br />

but will have changed. We requested up-to-date information on the position in June but did not have<br />

this information at the time this final version was prepared.<br />

This report has been prepared by the FRIDOM Project funded by the Department for International<br />

Development of the United Kingdom (UK) Government. We would like to thank the Minister of<br />

Health, the Deputy Minister of Health, and the Minister’s advisers for the advice provided, including<br />

the insights on the key issues facing the health sector. We would also like to thanks staff members<br />

from the MOH, the National Institute of Public Health (NIPH), the Kosovo Medicines Agency, the<br />

Kosovo University Hospital Clinic, the Telemedicine Centre, the Registration and Licensing Board,<br />

the FRIDOM team members, the EC, the World Bank, UNICEF, WHO, the Ministry of Finance and<br />

others who contributed ideas and provided advice to contribute to this report. We would like to thank<br />

Mentor Sadiku and Diana Pacolli for their very supportive assistance with the arrangement of<br />

meetings in the MOH. The suggestions in the report do not necessarily represent the views of people<br />

interviewed, or the Department for International Development, or the UK Government. The review<br />

has been conducted by Qamile Ramadani and Lynne McKenzie.<br />

The review is set out in the following sections.<br />

Section I Legal, policy and medium term planning framework<br />

Section II Barriers to change<br />

Section III Overview of structure<br />

Section IV Corporate functions<br />

Section V Strategic management<br />

Section VI Secondary and tertiary services<br />

Section VII Pharmaceuticals<br />

Section VIII Public health services<br />

Section IX Primary health services<br />

Section X Mental health services<br />

Section XI Health information, internal audit, licensing, inspection, special offices and<br />

committees<br />

Section XII Examples from other countries<br />

Section XIII New structure and current structure<br />

Appendices: Appendix A Abbreviations; Appendix B Review Methodology; Appendix C<br />

Legal Framework; Appendix D MTEF policy and planning priorities and strategic challenges<br />

for the MOH; Appendix E Staff numbers and budget 2009; Appendix F Organisation<br />

structure (current official one); and Appendix G Additional Advice in Response to Requests<br />

from the Minister of Health.<br />

8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!