25.07.2013 Views

Download

Download

Download

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Some countries have combined health and social functions in one ministry, for example Finland and<br />

many states in Australia. Some countries combine health and disability functions, but not other<br />

social functions. At this stage the option to enlarge the scope of the MOH has not been considered<br />

given the large challenges the MOH faces; weaknesses in key policy, planning and monitoring areas;<br />

the legacy of having had many changes in ministers and PSs; and the considerable capacity<br />

problems. Adding to this ministry’s functions or transporting this ministry’s functions into another<br />

ministry, is likely to create an agenda of issues that would overload any PS and senior management<br />

team.<br />

SECTION XIII: New structure and current structure<br />

The process to develop a new structure reflecting the functions of the MOH needs to be determined.<br />

The Working Group on the Structure has not been able to resolve differences and is not a suitable<br />

forum for this work, given that it is comprised of directors who will be affected by the restructuring. An<br />

alternative process could be to have strong leadership supported by the ministers. A small team<br />

could work with the group to develop and test the proposals before making recommendations to the<br />

PS and ministers. The team could be made up of people skilled in this work with many coming from<br />

outside the MOH. The process should involve gathering the necessary information. This draft report<br />

could be a partial contribution to that work, but it needs to be thoroughly tested. The option that is<br />

most strongly supported by the analysis should be fully costed and refined to make sure it is<br />

financially realistic and sustainable in the medium term.<br />

The main changes suggested for further testing have been set out in the executive summary. Table<br />

4 maps these changes to the current structure. While this table presents one option, note that<br />

variations on this option have been discussed in the report for many areas. Further work should test<br />

the variations in this report and other variations that emerge from the process outlined above. The<br />

mapping table below is not intended to suggest that staff members from the current structure are<br />

automatically transferred to the new structure. The restructuring should involve new job descriptions<br />

with suitable person specifications for all positions and a process for staff selection that might result<br />

in jobs for existing staff, or might involve recruiting new people with the required skills.<br />

37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!