Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...
Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...
Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>The</strong> product <strong>of</strong> the two rotation matrices Dk ⊗ Dj′ in eq. A.1 can be expressed<br />
as a product <strong>of</strong> Clebsch-Gordan coefficients and a rotation matrix D K . <strong>The</strong> linear com-<br />
bination <strong>of</strong> the products T(k, q ′ )|α ′ j ′ m ′′ 〉, that transforms under rotation as a particular<br />
state |βKQ〉 <strong>of</strong> the basis functions <strong>of</strong> the rotation matrix D k is<br />
<br />
|βKQ〉 = 〈kq ′ , j ′ m ′′ |KQ〉T(k, q ′ )|α ′ j ′ m ′′ 〉, (A.3)<br />
q,m ′′<br />
where 〈kq ′ , j ′ m ′′ |KQ〉 is a Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. Taking the inner product with<br />
〈αjm|<br />
<br />
〈kq ′ , j ′ m ′′ |KQ〉〈αjm|T(k, q ′ )|α ′ j ′ m ′′ 〉 = 〈αjm|βKQ〉 (A.4)<br />
q,m ′′<br />
can further be manipulated <strong>by</strong> multiplying both sides with 〈kq, j ′ m ′ |KQ〉 and doing<br />
the summation over K and Q. <strong>The</strong> inner product 〈αjm|βjm〉 equals the reduced matrix<br />
element 〈αj||T k||α ′ j ′ 〉, and the scalar product 〈αjm|βKQ〉 vanishes unless j = K and<br />
m = Q.<br />
〈αjm|T(k, q ′ )|α ′ j ′ m ′ 〉 =<br />
<br />
〈αjm|βKQ〉〈kq, j ′ m ′ |KQ〉<br />
KQ<br />
= 〈kq, j ′ m ′ |jm〉〈αj||Tk||α ′ j ′ 〉. (A.5)<br />
Hence we have successfully separated the dynamics from the geometrical properties<br />
<strong>of</strong> the system.<br />
By transforming the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients <strong>of</strong> eq. A.5 into Wigner-3j-<br />
symbols we derive the Wigner-Eckart <strong>The</strong>orem in the form used in this thesis,<br />
〈αjm|T(k, q ′ )|α ′ j ′ m ′ 〉 = (−1) j−m<br />
<br />
j k k ′<br />
−m q m ′<br />
<br />
〈αj||T k ||α ′ j ′ 〉. (A.6)<br />
One should be careful with the conventions <strong>of</strong> the reduced matrix elements. We<br />
have adopt the convention <strong>of</strong> Zare [12] and Edmonds [32], while others, e.g. Brink [33],<br />
define the reduced matrix element <strong>by</strong> a factor <strong>of</strong> 1<br />
√2j+1 smaller.<br />
52