Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...
Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...
Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Figure 6.3: Dependance <strong>of</strong> the final state probability <strong>of</strong> the detuning δ from the Raman<br />
resonance frequency<br />
By confining the atoms in an optical lattice it is possible to circumvent the<br />
resolution limits due to the atoms velocity and acceleration. We can then use a long<br />
pulse duration time, to ensure an efficient population transfer and to gain a good<br />
spectral resolution. But this also means that the resolution is ultimately limited <strong>by</strong> the<br />
size <strong>of</strong> each individual lattice site, i.e. 266nm for a beam with a wavelength <strong>of</strong> 532nm.<br />
<strong>The</strong> center <strong>of</strong> the resonant Raman region should coincide with the center <strong>of</strong> the lattice<br />
site to avoid a population transfer in the two neighbouring sites.<br />
A magnetic field gradient <strong>of</strong> 150G/cm means a splitting <strong>of</strong> the magnetic levels<br />
according to the anomalous Zeeman effect. Fig. 6.4 represents the case where the<br />
quantization axis <strong>of</strong> the atoms coincides with the z-direction in the lab frame (magnetic<br />
field along the direction <strong>of</strong> beam propagation). In this case eq. 6.7 reduces to<br />
46