25.07.2013 Views

Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...

Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...

Copyright by Kirsten Viering 2006 - Raizen Lab - The University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 6.3: Dependance <strong>of</strong> the final state probability <strong>of</strong> the detuning δ from the Raman<br />

resonance frequency<br />

By confining the atoms in an optical lattice it is possible to circumvent the<br />

resolution limits due to the atoms velocity and acceleration. We can then use a long<br />

pulse duration time, to ensure an efficient population transfer and to gain a good<br />

spectral resolution. But this also means that the resolution is ultimately limited <strong>by</strong> the<br />

size <strong>of</strong> each individual lattice site, i.e. 266nm for a beam with a wavelength <strong>of</strong> 532nm.<br />

<strong>The</strong> center <strong>of</strong> the resonant Raman region should coincide with the center <strong>of</strong> the lattice<br />

site to avoid a population transfer in the two neighbouring sites.<br />

A magnetic field gradient <strong>of</strong> 150G/cm means a splitting <strong>of</strong> the magnetic levels<br />

according to the anomalous Zeeman effect. Fig. 6.4 represents the case where the<br />

quantization axis <strong>of</strong> the atoms coincides with the z-direction in the lab frame (magnetic<br />

field along the direction <strong>of</strong> beam propagation). In this case eq. 6.7 reduces to<br />

46

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!