25.07.2013 Views

Engineering Application of Exergy Analysis - circe - Universidad de ...

Engineering Application of Exergy Analysis - circe - Universidad de ...

Engineering Application of Exergy Analysis - circe - Universidad de ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The exergy <strong>of</strong> gas which is recovered in the<br />

gashol<strong>de</strong>r is shown in Fig. 3. In this figure and in<br />

the following ones, two families <strong>of</strong> points are plot:<br />

the absolute value (left axis) and the relative value<br />

(according to 5 or 6) in the right axis. Due to<br />

quality requirements <strong>of</strong> gas to be stored (e. g.<br />

minimum amount <strong>of</strong> CO), gas recovery only takes<br />

place during part <strong>of</strong> the cycle. It should be noted<br />

that the exergy <strong>of</strong> this gas represents between 50<br />

and more than 80% <strong>of</strong> exergy <strong>of</strong> flow 1.<br />

B[10] (kW)<br />

300000<br />

250000<br />

200000<br />

150000<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

0<br />

B[10] (kW) eta[10] (‐)<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />

Time (s)<br />

Fig. 3. <strong>Exergy</strong> <strong>of</strong> recovered gas.<br />

B[9] (kW)<br />

250000<br />

200000<br />

150000<br />

100000<br />

50000<br />

0<br />

B[9] (kW) phi_flare (‐)<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />

Fig. 4. <strong>Exergy</strong> <strong>of</strong> flared gas.<br />

Time (s)<br />

1<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0<br />

1.0<br />

0.9<br />

0.8<br />

0.7<br />

0.6<br />

0.5<br />

0.4<br />

0.3<br />

0.2<br />

0.1<br />

0.0<br />

The part <strong>of</strong> the gas which is flared is represented<br />

in Fig. 4. This amount represents more than 50%<br />

<strong>of</strong> flow 1 before the recovery but falls at the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the cycle. This result indicates that it is very<br />

interesting to extend the duration <strong>of</strong> the recovery<br />

as much as possible and to flare gas only when this<br />

is the only possibility.<br />

As explained previously, the system not only<br />

recovers gas, but also produces steam. Figure 5<br />

shows the evolution <strong>of</strong> exergy <strong>of</strong> steam used in<br />

several steel treatments (flow 104). This amounts<br />

eta [10] (‐)<br />

phi_flare (‐)<br />

around 12 MW, which corresponds to less than<br />

10% <strong>of</strong> the exergy <strong>of</strong> converter gas.<br />

B[104] (kW)<br />

14000<br />

12000<br />

10000<br />

8000<br />

6000<br />

4000<br />

2000<br />

0<br />

B[104] (kW) eta[104] (‐)<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />

Time (s)<br />

Fig. 5. <strong>Exergy</strong> <strong>of</strong> steam to steel treatments.<br />

0.5<br />

0.45<br />

0.4<br />

0.35<br />

0.3<br />

0.25<br />

0.2<br />

0.15<br />

0.1<br />

0.05<br />

0<br />

<strong>Exergy</strong> <strong>of</strong> steam exported to the steam net <strong>of</strong><br />

steelworks is presented in Fig. 6. First, the system<br />

exports 1.5 MW <strong>of</strong> steam, which are progressively<br />

reduced and afterwards more than 2 MW are<br />

imported (negative value). These amounts are less<br />

than 2% <strong>of</strong> the exergy <strong>of</strong> flow 1.<br />

B[135] (kW)<br />

2000<br />

1500<br />

1000<br />

500<br />

0<br />

‐500<br />

‐1000<br />

‐1500<br />

‐2000<br />

‐2500<br />

‐3000<br />

B[135] (kW) eta[135] (‐)<br />

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200<br />

Time (s)<br />

Fig. 6. <strong>Exergy</strong> <strong>of</strong> steam exchanged with the net.<br />

0.06<br />

0.04<br />

0.02<br />

0<br />

‐0.02<br />

‐0.04<br />

‐0.06<br />

‐0.08<br />

‐0.1<br />

Results presented above have shown the variation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the exergy <strong>of</strong> several flows leaving the system.<br />

However, a key advantage <strong>of</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> exergy is<br />

that it allows one to consi<strong>de</strong>r also losses <strong>of</strong> energy<br />

quality (irreversibilities) taking place insi<strong>de</strong> the<br />

different component.<br />

Figure 7 represents the exergy <strong>de</strong>stroyed in the<br />

combustion process. The low value <strong>of</strong> this variable<br />

(around 2%) can be explained by consi<strong>de</strong>ring two<br />

points. First, only a fraction <strong>of</strong> the CO contained in<br />

the gas is burned (the other part contributes<br />

strongly to the chemical exergy <strong>of</strong> gas which is<br />

either stored or flared, as it can be seen in Fig. 3<br />

http://www.ecos2010.ch 5 14-17th june 2010, Lausanne, Switzerland<br />

eta[104] (‐)<br />

eta[135] (‐)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!