Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Figure 2-2: The 2,3-dibromothiophene molecule. The two unlabeled vertices represent<br />
hydrogen atoms, whose nuclei were used in this experiment.<br />
success; the frequencies at which the signal evolves for each initial state depend on the<br />
energy difference between the two states.<br />
In the same paper, they also implement a simulation of a truncated, driven, anharmonic<br />
oscillator, but the above is sufficient for our purposes of illustrating the basic methods<br />
of quantum simulation with NMR. In what follows, we begin to address the question of<br />
precision using this experiment as a model.<br />
2.3 The question of precision<br />
Having seen qualitative evidence for the success of quantum simulation, we move to dis-<br />
cussing the quantitative issue of how much precision may be obtained in a measured result.<br />
For instance, we might ask in the case of the truncated oscillator experiment, how could one<br />
extract the harmonic oscillator frequency from the simulation results? These peaks could<br />
be Fourier-transformed to yield an energy (or frequency) spectrum; depending on the initial<br />
states used, the spectra would show peaks at Ω, 2Ω, or 3Ω. How well can Ω be measured,<br />
and how does this precision depend on the number of pulses used, or the total simulation<br />
time?<br />
We wish to give a general idea for how the limitation to the precision may be estimated.<br />
To begin with, the precision of the final result is limited by the width of the peak in<br />
frequency space; thus, it depends on the Fourier sampling rate. Also, the minimum time<br />
step determines the maximum energy that can be measured. Therefore, we may suppose<br />
that the error in the final result ǫ scales as Ω/Q, where Q is the maximum number of time<br />
steps. Since the total number of gates NG is proportional to Q, NG ∝ Ω/ǫ. A bound on the<br />
precision may then be obtained by calculating the total simulation time NGtg, where tg is<br />
the time to perform a single iteration of the simulated Hamiltonian, and setting this equal<br />
to the decoherence time.<br />
Admittedly, the above example is somewhat artificial, in that one is attempting to calcu-<br />
59