Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
The same effect as number 2 above is achieved if we regard ˆz rotations as merely<br />
a shifting of the reference frame by the angle θ in each Rˆz(θ) rotation. The effect<br />
of ˆz rotations is implemented by shifting the phases of each subsequent single-qubit<br />
pulse to account for them. Choosing between this method and number 2 is a practical<br />
matter; because it requires less modification to the pulse sequence, this method is<br />
generally preferred.<br />
2.1.4 Two-qubit operations<br />
Now that we are armed with the ability to do arbitrary single-qubit rotations and with an in-<br />
teraction Hamiltonian (Eq. 2.4) we can construct two-qubit gates such as the controlled-not<br />
(CNOT). The CNOT, along with arbitrary single-qubit rotations, is sufficient to implement<br />
universal quantum computation; all the operations needed for quantum simulation are con-<br />
tained within this, and in practice less control is often required. In the computational basis<br />
({|00〉 , |01〉,|10〉 , |11〉}), the CNOT has this matrix representation:<br />
⎡ ⎤<br />
1 0 0 0<br />
⎢ ⎥<br />
⎢<br />
CNOT12 = ⎢<br />
0 1 0 0 ⎥<br />
⎢<br />
⎣ 0 0 0 1<br />
⎥ . (2.17)<br />
⎦<br />
0 0 1 0<br />
Suppose there are two coupled spins. The basic pulse sequence rotates spin 2, the “target<br />
qubit,” from a ˆz eigenstate into the ˆx-ˆy plane of the Bloch sphere. Then, during a period<br />
of free evolution under H0 + HI, the direction of the rotation of this spin (in the rotating<br />
frame) depends on the state of spin 1, called the “control qubit.” After a time equal to<br />
1/(2J12), the spin is rotated back into a ˆz eigenstate. This effectively flips (or doesn’t) spin<br />
2 based on the state of spin 1. Specifically, the pulse sequence looks like:<br />
U ′ CNOT = Rˆx(π/2)UI(1/(2J12))Rˆy(π/2) =<br />
⎡ ⎤<br />
1 0 0 0<br />
⎢ ⎥<br />
⎢<br />
0 i 0 0 ⎥<br />
⎢<br />
⎣ 0 0 0 −i<br />
⎥ ,<br />
⎦<br />
(2.18)<br />
0 0 1 0<br />
where UI(t) = exp(−iHIt/) is the unitary evolution under HI. Fig. 2-1 shows the opera-<br />
tion of the CNOT gate as described here.<br />
This does not exactly produce the CNOT presented in Eq. 2.17, but the gate can be<br />
exactly duplicated by applying appropriate single-qubit pulses to spins 1 and 2. Specifically,<br />
a Rˆz(−π/2) is required on qubit 2 and Rˆz(π/2) on qubit 1.<br />
2.1.5 Refocusing<br />
We briefly present one more invaluable technique for NMR quantum control. In NMR, the<br />
ZZ interaction between spins is “always on,” in the sense that it’s a part of the Hamilto-<br />
53