25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The same effect as number 2 above is achieved if we regard ˆz rotations as merely<br />

a shifting of the reference frame by the angle θ in each Rˆz(θ) rotation. The effect<br />

of ˆz rotations is implemented by shifting the phases of each subsequent single-qubit<br />

pulse to account for them. Choosing between this method and number 2 is a practical<br />

matter; because it requires less modification to the pulse sequence, this method is<br />

generally preferred.<br />

2.1.4 Two-qubit operations<br />

Now that we are armed with the ability to do arbitrary single-qubit rotations and with an in-<br />

teraction Hamiltonian (Eq. 2.4) we can construct two-qubit gates such as the controlled-not<br />

(CNOT). The CNOT, along with arbitrary single-qubit rotations, is sufficient to implement<br />

universal quantum computation; all the operations needed for quantum simulation are con-<br />

tained within this, and in practice less control is often required. In the computational basis<br />

({|00〉 , |01〉,|10〉 , |11〉}), the CNOT has this matrix representation:<br />

⎡ ⎤<br />

1 0 0 0<br />

⎢ ⎥<br />

⎢<br />

CNOT12 = ⎢<br />

0 1 0 0 ⎥<br />

⎢<br />

⎣ 0 0 0 1<br />

⎥ . (2.17)<br />

⎦<br />

0 0 1 0<br />

Suppose there are two coupled spins. The basic pulse sequence rotates spin 2, the “target<br />

qubit,” from a ˆz eigenstate into the ˆx-ˆy plane of the Bloch sphere. Then, during a period<br />

of free evolution under H0 + HI, the direction of the rotation of this spin (in the rotating<br />

frame) depends on the state of spin 1, called the “control qubit.” After a time equal to<br />

1/(2J12), the spin is rotated back into a ˆz eigenstate. This effectively flips (or doesn’t) spin<br />

2 based on the state of spin 1. Specifically, the pulse sequence looks like:<br />

U ′ CNOT = Rˆx(π/2)UI(1/(2J12))Rˆy(π/2) =<br />

⎡ ⎤<br />

1 0 0 0<br />

⎢ ⎥<br />

⎢<br />

0 i 0 0 ⎥<br />

⎢<br />

⎣ 0 0 0 −i<br />

⎥ ,<br />

⎦<br />

(2.18)<br />

0 0 1 0<br />

where UI(t) = exp(−iHIt/) is the unitary evolution under HI. Fig. 2-1 shows the opera-<br />

tion of the CNOT gate as described here.<br />

This does not exactly produce the CNOT presented in Eq. 2.17, but the gate can be<br />

exactly duplicated by applying appropriate single-qubit pulses to spins 1 and 2. Specifically,<br />

a Rˆz(−π/2) is required on qubit 2 and Rˆz(π/2) on qubit 1.<br />

2.1.5 Refocusing<br />

We briefly present one more invaluable technique for NMR quantum control. In NMR, the<br />

ZZ interaction between spins is “always on,” in the sense that it’s a part of the Hamilto-<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!