25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

digits of precision in the final result. We also note that the inefficiency increases if error<br />

correction techniques need to be used, such that the time required scales as O(1/ǫ r ), where<br />

r ≥ 2. Errors in the final answer are also induced by systematic control errors; we find that<br />

evolution during single-qubit pulses due to the “always-on” NMR interaction Hamiltonian<br />

is the main source of these errors. The time resources needed for error correction and<br />

to compensate control errors may be compared to Table 1.2, which presents the required<br />

resources accounting only for the error in the final measurement estimates.<br />

Our results do not rule out the usefulness of digital quantum simulations. They merely<br />

point out that quantum simulation outperforms classical only for specific problems and<br />

numbers of qubits. It remains exponentially more efficient than classical simulation for<br />

quantum systems for which no good approximate classical simulation is known, as long as<br />

only fixed precision is required.<br />

Part II<br />

In the second part, we ask: how can one build a scalable two-dimensional array of trapped<br />

ions that is suitable for analog quantum simulation? We will be focused, in particular,<br />

on the goal of analog simulation of quantum spin models, particularly spin frustration. In<br />

pursuing the answer to this question, we design, test, and evaluate two types of ion trap<br />

that may be suitable for this purpose, a lattice ion trap and an elliptical surface-electrode<br />

ion trap. It is essential not only to design, model, build, and test these traps, but also<br />

to examine how analog quantum simulation might actually be performed in such traps. It<br />

will be important to estimate the expected simulated coupling rates in each type of trap,<br />

including all rf and dc fields that act on the ion. This requires us to ask, for example, how<br />

the motional frequencies and simulated coupling rates scale with the size of the trap, how<br />

the potentials that produce an effective Hamiltonian might be applied, and how rf-induced<br />

micromotion might affect the fidelity of analog quantum simulations.<br />

In Chapter 4, we begin with an introduction to quantum simulation with trapped<br />

ions, including ion trap Hamiltonians, control techniques, and proposals for analog quantum<br />

simulation. We particularly focus on the proposal of Porras and Cirac for the study of 2-D<br />

spin models [PC04b]. The goal of building a 2-D simulator of antiferromagnetic spin lattices,<br />

in which phenomena such as spin frustration could be observed, is the prime motivation for<br />

the rest of the work in this part.<br />

In Chapter 5, we examine the lattice ion trap architecture, in which ions are confined<br />

in a 2-D array of individual potential wells, enabling the trapping of ions in virtually any<br />

configuration (since sites can be loaded selectively) with a well-defined spacing between<br />

ions. Such a trap could provide the stable array of trapped ions that is required for scalable<br />

analog quantum simulation. We experimentally test certain predictions about the trapping<br />

potentials, most importantly the motional frequencies of the ions, and find that the traps<br />

agree well with our theoretical predictions. However, despite the apparent advantages of<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!