Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
digits of precision in the final result. We also note that the inefficiency increases if error<br />
correction techniques need to be used, such that the time required scales as O(1/ǫ r ), where<br />
r ≥ 2. Errors in the final answer are also induced by systematic control errors; we find that<br />
evolution during single-qubit pulses due to the “always-on” NMR interaction Hamiltonian<br />
is the main source of these errors. The time resources needed for error correction and<br />
to compensate control errors may be compared to Table 1.2, which presents the required<br />
resources accounting only for the error in the final measurement estimates.<br />
Our results do not rule out the usefulness of digital quantum simulations. They merely<br />
point out that quantum simulation outperforms classical only for specific problems and<br />
numbers of qubits. It remains exponentially more efficient than classical simulation for<br />
quantum systems for which no good approximate classical simulation is known, as long as<br />
only fixed precision is required.<br />
Part II<br />
In the second part, we ask: how can one build a scalable two-dimensional array of trapped<br />
ions that is suitable for analog quantum simulation? We will be focused, in particular,<br />
on the goal of analog simulation of quantum spin models, particularly spin frustration. In<br />
pursuing the answer to this question, we design, test, and evaluate two types of ion trap<br />
that may be suitable for this purpose, a lattice ion trap and an elliptical surface-electrode<br />
ion trap. It is essential not only to design, model, build, and test these traps, but also<br />
to examine how analog quantum simulation might actually be performed in such traps. It<br />
will be important to estimate the expected simulated coupling rates in each type of trap,<br />
including all rf and dc fields that act on the ion. This requires us to ask, for example, how<br />
the motional frequencies and simulated coupling rates scale with the size of the trap, how<br />
the potentials that produce an effective Hamiltonian might be applied, and how rf-induced<br />
micromotion might affect the fidelity of analog quantum simulations.<br />
In Chapter 4, we begin with an introduction to quantum simulation with trapped<br />
ions, including ion trap Hamiltonians, control techniques, and proposals for analog quantum<br />
simulation. We particularly focus on the proposal of Porras and Cirac for the study of 2-D<br />
spin models [PC04b]. The goal of building a 2-D simulator of antiferromagnetic spin lattices,<br />
in which phenomena such as spin frustration could be observed, is the prime motivation for<br />
the rest of the work in this part.<br />
In Chapter 5, we examine the lattice ion trap architecture, in which ions are confined<br />
in a 2-D array of individual potential wells, enabling the trapping of ions in virtually any<br />
configuration (since sites can be loaded selectively) with a well-defined spacing between<br />
ions. Such a trap could provide the stable array of trapped ions that is required for scalable<br />
analog quantum simulation. We experimentally test certain predictions about the trapping<br />
potentials, most importantly the motional frequencies of the ions, and find that the traps<br />
agree well with our theoretical predictions. However, despite the apparent advantages of<br />
38