25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2. Initialization to a simple fiducial state such as |000...0〉.<br />

3. Decoherence times much longer than the gate times.<br />

4. A universal set of quantum gates.<br />

5. High efficiency, qubit-specific measurements.<br />

We now briefly summarize how these criteria differ for quantum simulation. The first<br />

criterion certainly holds, although the form of the large-scale quantum simulator may be<br />

different for analog, as opposed to digital, quantum simulation (as discussed above). The<br />

second and third also hold, but the initial state will depend greatly on the problem being<br />

simulated. It may be necessary to create a state such as |000...0〉, which may then be<br />

transformed into the correct initial state through single-qubit rotations. An example of this<br />

is in Ref. [WBL02]. However, it is also possible that the relevant degrees of freedom may<br />

be described by continuous variables. In the example of cold atoms in an optical lattice,<br />

it is typically necessary for the translational degrees of freedom of the atoms to be cold;<br />

however, the simulation itself may not depend on the internal states. This is one way in<br />

which analog quantum simulation enables simulation with less control than digital; in the<br />

digital case, the momenta of the atoms would be discretized and then programmed into a<br />

set of qubits at the beginning of the simulation.<br />

The fourth criterion must also be modified for quantum simulation, and again varies<br />

between the digital and analog types. Depending on the problem being implemented, a<br />

set of controls less powerful than those of a universal quantum computer may be required.<br />

The optical lattices are again a good example. In this analog simulation, sufficient control<br />

is present to simulate a Bose-Hubbard model. By contrast, a universal quantum simulator<br />

is equally as powerful as a universal quantum computer, because for either any arbitrary<br />

Hamiltonian (and corresponding unitary gate) may be approximated to arbitrary accuracy.<br />

It is also true, however, that for certain digital quantum simulations, only a subset of a<br />

universal gate set will be required. Finally, high measurement fidelity is important in both<br />

analog and digital quantum simulation, but for the analog variety, it may be a measurement<br />

of a continuous variable, and “qubit-specific” may not have meaning. Measuring the density<br />

of atoms in space is an example of this.<br />

Scaling up quantum simulators is a major research question no matter what physical<br />

system forms the qubit. The two physical systems that are studied in this thesis are solution-<br />

state NMR and trapped ions; however, solution-state NMR is intrinsically unscalable. Ion<br />

traps, by contrast, do satisfy all the DiVincenzo criteria. The only caveat is that although<br />

ion traps are scalable in principle, we do not yet know which method for scaling them up<br />

will prove most effective. We therefore focus here on the scalability of ion traps.<br />

35

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!