Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
2. Initialization to a simple fiducial state such as |000...0〉.<br />
3. Decoherence times much longer than the gate times.<br />
4. A universal set of quantum gates.<br />
5. High efficiency, qubit-specific measurements.<br />
We now briefly summarize how these criteria differ for quantum simulation. The first<br />
criterion certainly holds, although the form of the large-scale quantum simulator may be<br />
different for analog, as opposed to digital, quantum simulation (as discussed above). The<br />
second and third also hold, but the initial state will depend greatly on the problem being<br />
simulated. It may be necessary to create a state such as |000...0〉, which may then be<br />
transformed into the correct initial state through single-qubit rotations. An example of this<br />
is in Ref. [WBL02]. However, it is also possible that the relevant degrees of freedom may<br />
be described by continuous variables. In the example of cold atoms in an optical lattice,<br />
it is typically necessary for the translational degrees of freedom of the atoms to be cold;<br />
however, the simulation itself may not depend on the internal states. This is one way in<br />
which analog quantum simulation enables simulation with less control than digital; in the<br />
digital case, the momenta of the atoms would be discretized and then programmed into a<br />
set of qubits at the beginning of the simulation.<br />
The fourth criterion must also be modified for quantum simulation, and again varies<br />
between the digital and analog types. Depending on the problem being implemented, a<br />
set of controls less powerful than those of a universal quantum computer may be required.<br />
The optical lattices are again a good example. In this analog simulation, sufficient control<br />
is present to simulate a Bose-Hubbard model. By contrast, a universal quantum simulator<br />
is equally as powerful as a universal quantum computer, because for either any arbitrary<br />
Hamiltonian (and corresponding unitary gate) may be approximated to arbitrary accuracy.<br />
It is also true, however, that for certain digital quantum simulations, only a subset of a<br />
universal gate set will be required. Finally, high measurement fidelity is important in both<br />
analog and digital quantum simulation, but for the analog variety, it may be a measurement<br />
of a continuous variable, and “qubit-specific” may not have meaning. Measuring the density<br />
of atoms in space is an example of this.<br />
Scaling up quantum simulators is a major research question no matter what physical<br />
system forms the qubit. The two physical systems that are studied in this thesis are solution-<br />
state NMR and trapped ions; however, solution-state NMR is intrinsically unscalable. Ion<br />
traps, by contrast, do satisfy all the DiVincenzo criteria. The only caveat is that although<br />
ion traps are scalable in principle, we do not yet know which method for scaling them up<br />
will prove most effective. We therefore focus here on the scalability of ion traps.<br />
35