Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

More documents

Recommendations

Info

[SCR + 06] S. Seidelin, J. Chiaverini, R. Reichle, J. J. Bollinger, D. Liebfried, J. Britton, J. H. Wesenberg, R. B. Blakestad, R. J. Epstein, D. B. Hume, J. D. Jost, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, N. Shiga, and D. J. Wineland. Microfabricated surfaceelectrode ion trap for scalable quantum information processing. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 253003, 2006. [SGA + 05] S. Stahl, F. Galve, J. Alonso, S. Djekic, W. Quint, T. Valenzuela, J. Verdu, M. Vogel, and G. Werth. A planar Penning trap. Eur. Phys. J. D, 32, 139–146, 2005. [Sho38] W. Shockley. Currents to conductors induced by a moving point charge. J. Appl. Phys., 9, 635, 1938. [Sho94] P. W. Shor. Algorithms for quantum computation: Discrete log and factoring. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on the Foundations of Computer Science, p. 124, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1994. [Sho96] P. W. Shor. Fault-tolerant quantum computation. In Proceedings of the 37th Symposium on Foundations of Computing, p. 56, IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, 1996. [SHO + 06] D. Stick, W. K. Hensinger, S. Olmschenk, M. J. Madsen, K. Schwab, and C. Monroe. Ion trap in a semiconductor chip. Nature Physics, 2, 36, 2006. [SRL + 05] P. O. Schmidt, T. Rosenband, C. Langer, W. M. Itano, J. C. Bergquist, and D. J. Wineland. Spectroscopy using quantum logic. Science, 309, 749–752, 2005. [SRM + 08] R. Schmied, T. Roscilde, V. Murg, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac. Quantum phases of trapped ions in an optical lattice. New J. Phys., 10, 045017, 2008. [SSSK08] Y.-I. Shin, C. H. Schunck, A. Schirotzek, and W. Ketterle. Phase diagram of a two-component Fermi gas with resonant interactions. Nature, 451, 689, 2008. [Ste96] A. M. Steane. Error correcting codes in quantum theory. Phys. Rev. Lett., 77, 793, 1996. [Ste03] Matthias Steffen. A Prototype Quantum Computer using Nuclear Spins in Liquid Solution. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2003. [STH + 98] S. Somaroo, C. H. Tseng, T. F. Havel, R. Laflamme, and D. G. Cory. Quantum simulations on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82, 5381, 1998. [Suz92] M. Suzuki. Phys. Lett. A, 165, 387, 1992. [SvDH + 03] M. Steffen, W. van Dam, T. Hogg, G. Breyta, and I. L. Chuang. Experimental implementation of an adiabatic quantum optimization algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett., 90, 067903, 2003. [SWL09] R. Schmied, J. Wesenberg, and D. Leibfried. Optimal surface-electrode trap lattices for quantum simulation with trapped ions. www.arXiv.org: quantph/0902.1686v1, 2009. 226
[TBZ05] L. Tian, R. Blatt, and P. Zoller. Scalable ion trap quantum computing without moving ions. Eur. Phys. J. D, 32, 201–208, 2005. [TKK + 99] Q. A. Turchette, D. Kielpinski, B. E. King, D. Liebfried, D. M. Meekhof, C. J. Myatt, M. A. Rowe, C. A. Sackett, C. S. Wood, W. M. Itano, C. Monroe, and D. J. Wineland. Heating of trapped ions from the quantum mechanical ground state. Phys. Rev. A, 61, 063418, 1999. [Tro58] H. F. Trotter. Approximation of semi-groups of operators. Pacific Journal of Math, 8, 887, 1958. [TSS + 00] C. H. Tseng, S. Somaroo, Y. Sharf, E. Knill, R. Laflamme, T. F. Havel, and D. G. Cory. Quantum simulation of a three-body-interaction Hamiltonian on an NMR quantum computer. Phys. Rev. A, 61, 012302, 2000. [TW05] M. Troyer and U.-J. Wiese. Computational conplexity and fundamental limitations to fermionic quantum monte carlo simulations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94, 170201, 2005. [Van01] Lieven M. K. Vandersypen. Experimental Quantum Computation with Nuclear Spins in Liquid Solution. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University, 2001. [VC05] L. M. K. Vandersypen and I. L. Chuang. NMR techniques for quantum control and computation. Rev. Mod. Phys., 76, 1037, 2005. [VC08] F. Verstraete and J. I. Cirac. Renormalization algorithms for quantum many-body systems in two and higher dimensions. www.arxiv.org: condmat/0407066v1, 2008. [Vid04] G. Vidal. Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. Lett., 93, 040502, 2004. [Vid07] G. Vidal. Classical simulation of infinite-size quantum lattice systems in one spatial dimension. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98, 070201, 2007. [VMC08] F. Verstraete, V. Murg, and J. I. Cirac. Matrix product states, projected entangled pair states, and variational renormalization group methods for quantum spin systems. Advances in Physics, 57, 143–224, 2008. [VSB + 01] L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, G. Breyta, C. S. Yannoni, M. H. Sherwood, and I. L. Chuang. Experimental realization of Shor’s quantum factoring algorithm using nuclear magnetic resonance. Nature, 414, 883–887, 2001. [VSS + 99] L. M. K. Vandersypen, M. Steffen, M. H. Sherwood, C. S. Yannoni, G. Breyta, and I. L. Chuang. Implementation of a three-quantum bit search algorithm. Appl. Phys. Lett., 76, 646–648, 1999. [WBL02] L. A. Wu, M. S. Byrd, and D. A. Lidar. Polynomial-time simulation of pairing models on a quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Lett., 82(5), 057904, 2002. 227
Page 1:
An Investigation of Precision and S
Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgments What a long, strang
Page 7:
should totally start a band. I also
Page 10 and 11:
2.4 Conclusions and further questio
Page 12 and 13:
7.6.1 Regular array of stationary q
Page 15 and 16:
List of Figures 2-1 The CNOT gate i
Page 17:
7-12 Magnetic fields due to a “tr
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 Introduction The growth o
Page 23 and 24:
1.1 Quantum information The concept
Page 25 and 26:
us whether the target system obeys
Page 27 and 28:
Nevertheless, there are a number of
Page 29 and 30:
Digital Analog Classical Quantum Sp
Page 31 and 32:
electrodes [TKK + 99]. This heating
Page 33 and 34:
Digital Analog Classical Quantum Sp
Page 35 and 36:
2. Initialization to a simple fiduc
Page 37 and 38:
qubits, and in Ref. [SGA + 05] in t
Page 39 and 40:
the lattice architecture, we discov
Page 41 and 42:
1.6 Contributions to this work In t
Page 43:
5) Ref. [DLC + 09b] Wiring up trapp
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 2 Quantum simulation using
Page 49 and 50:
µN the nuclear magneton, and B0 th
Page 51 and 52:
⎡ ⎤ a 0 0 0 ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ρ2 =
Page 53 and 54:
The same effect as number 2 above i
Page 55 and 56:
where V0 is the maximum signal stre
Page 57 and 58:
actions that occur between nuclei i
Page 59 and 60:
Figure 2-2: The 2,3-dibromothiophen
Page 61:
detail how this was done with a sim
Page 64 and 65:
and thus requires invocation of the
Page 66 and 67:
Renormalization Group (DMRG), with
Page 68 and 69:
3.3 The bounds on precision In this
Page 70 and 71:
Figure 3-1: A schematic of a generi
Page 72 and 73:
Figure 3-3: The 11.7 T, 500 MHz sup
Page 74 and 75:
. Figure 3-4: The above probe is a
Page 76 and 77:
Figure 3-5: The CHFBr2 molecule. Al
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3-6: Frequency-domain spectr
Page 80 and 81:
used to extract the answer is irrel
Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 4 Theory and history of qua
Page 85 and 86:
GND RF r ENDCAP 0 z 0 ENDCAP Ring T
Page 87 and 88:
where Q is the charge of the trappe
Page 89 and 90:
angular momentum along the quantiza
Page 91 and 92:
emission from the excited state |
Page 93 and 94:
selection rule ∆m = ±1 is applie
Page 95 and 96:
Figure 4-3: Schematic diagram of sp
Page 97 and 98:
to address an ion in state |↑〉
Page 99 and 100:
the vibrational temperature is low.
Page 101 and 102:
to the design of the trap itself. M
Page 103 and 104:
to the quantum-mechanical ground st
Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 5 Lattice ion traps for qua
Page 107 and 108:
Figure 5-1: Schematic of the lattic
Page 109 and 110:
Figure 5-3: Fit to Eq. 5.2 of the C
Page 111 and 112:
Figure 5-4: The vacuum chamber for
Page 113 and 114:
weeks. Low pressures depend on choo
Page 115 and 116:
Figure 5-5: Left: Level diagram for
Page 117 and 118:
Figure 5-7: (a) Schematic of the cr
Page 119 and 120:
(a) Lattice Trap Schematic TOP PLAT
Page 121 and 122:
mix the microspheres evenly in the
Page 123 and 124:
Using the expression for ωˆr deri
Page 125 and 126:
Figure 5-15: Plot of the motional c
Page 127 and 128:
Figure 5-17: Dependence of the trap
Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 6 Surface-electrode PCB ion
Page 131 and 132:
Figure 6-1: Schematic of a linear i
Page 133 and 134:
Figure 6-2: Layout of the trap elec
Page 135 and 136:
Figure 6-3: Above are the cross sec
Page 137 and 138:
Figure 6-6: Photograph of the trap
Page 139 and 140:
Figure 6-8: CCD image of a cloud of
Page 141 and 142:
Figure 6-9: Measurement results sho
Page 143 and 144:
Figure 6-11: Bastille mounted in th
Page 145 and 146:
Figure 6-13: A diagram of the setup
Page 147 and 148:
Figure 6-14: A plot of the trapped
Page 149 and 150:
allows us to upper-bound the amount
Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 7 Quantum simulation in sur
Page 153 and 154:
Figure 7-1: Left: Uraniborg 1, as r
Page 155 and 156:
Figure 7-3: Calculated secular freq
Page 157 and 158:
Figure 7-5: Left: Structure of 2-D
Page 159 and 160:
Figure 7-7: Scaling of the order of
Page 161 and 162:
involved. Because ions near the cen
Page 163 and 164:
Results Before presenting the numer
Page 165 and 166:
Figure 7-10: Calculation results fo
Page 167 and 168:
7.3 Magnetic gradient forces Now th
Page 169 and 170:
Figure 7-13: Scaling of the J-coupl
Page 171 and 172:
how are single-ion operations to be
Page 173 and 174:
250 psi, which increases to around
Page 175 and 176: Figure 7-18: At the center of this
Page 177 and 178: Figure 7-19: The plastic socket tha
Page 179 and 180: Figure 7-21: The two internal lense
Page 181 and 182: Figure 7-22: Measured secular frequ
Page 183 and 184: Along ˆy, the spacing is dˆy = 28
Page 185 and 186: of O2 to 2 × 10 −12 torr. Decohe
Page 187 and 188: Part III Toward ion-ion coupling ov
Page 189 and 190: Chapter 8 Motivation for and theory
Page 191 and 192: Figure 8-1: Schematic of the experi
Page 193 and 194: are in close agreement in the case
Page 195 and 196: 8.2.3 Simulated coupling rates We n
Page 197 and 198: Johnson noise We begin our discussi
Page 199 and 200: should suffice. Note that the above
Page 201 and 202: Chapter 9 Measuring the interaction
Page 203 and 204: Figure 9-2: Left: Level diagram for
Page 205 and 206: Figure 9-5: Photograph of the micro
Page 207 and 208: A fit of the resulting curve return
Page 209 and 210: Figure 9-9: Linear fit of the ωˆy
Page 211 and 212: Figure 9-12: Heating rate as determ
Page 213 and 214: Chapter 10 Conclusions and outlook
Page 215 and 216: traps, linking ions using photons,
Page 217 and 218: Bibliography [ADM05] Paul M. Alsing
Page 219 and 220: [CGB + 94] J. I. Cirac, L. J. Garay
Page 221 and 222: [GME + 02] M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T
Page 223 and 224: [LCL + 07] D. R. Leibrandt, R. J. C
Page 225: [PC04a] D. Porras and J. I. Cirac.
Page 229 and 230: Appendix A Matlab code for Ising mo
Page 231 and 232: err_result = mean(theerr) 231
Page 233 and 234: J = J0; Jt(1) = J; Bt(1) = B; for k
Page 235 and 236: A.3 Simulation with constant force
Page 237 and 238: Appendix B Mathematica code for ion
Page 239 and 240: 2 crystal_shape_6uraniborg.nb Out[6
Page 241 and 242: Appendix C How to trap ions in a cl
Page 243 and 244: Finally, we note that the chilled w
Page 245 and 246: C.4 Laser alignment and imaging As
show all

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?