[DLC + 09b] N. Daniilidis, T. Lee, R. Clark, S. Narayanan, and H. Häffner. Wiring up trapped ions to study aspects of quantum information. J. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. B., to appear, 2009. [DOS + 06] L. Deslauriers, S. Olmschenk, D. Stick, W. K. Hensinger, J. Sterk, and C. Monroe. Scaling and suppression of anomalous heating in ion traps. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. Lett., 97, 103007, 2006. [DRS03] J. Dukelsky, J. M. Roman, and G. Sierra. Comment on “Polynomial-time simulation of pairing models on a quantum computer”. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. Lett., 90, 249803–1, 2003. [DS96] D. P. DiVincenzo and P. W. Shor. Fault-tolerant error correction with efficient quantum codes. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. Lett., 77, 3260, 1996. [DS99] J. Dukelsky and G. Sierra. A density matrix renormalization group study of ultrasmall superconducting grains. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. Lett., 83, 172, 1999. [EKN68] L. E. Estes, T. H. Keil, and L. M. Narducci. Quantum-mechanical description of two coupled harmonic oscillators. <strong>Ph</strong>ysical Review, 175, 286–299, 1968. [ESL + 07] R. J. Epstein, S. Seidelin, D. Leibfried, J. H. Wesenberg, J. J. Bollinger, J. M. Amini, R. B. Blakestad, J. Britton, J. P. Home, W. M. Itano, J. D. Jost, E. Knill, C. Langer, R. Ozeri, N. Shiga, and D. J. Wineland. Simplified motional heating rate measurements of trapped ions. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. A, 76, 033411, 2007. [Fey82] R. Feynman. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. <strong>Ph</strong>ys., 21, 467, 1982. [Fis76] J. R. Fisk. Helical-resonator design techniques. QST, p. 11, 1976. [FKW02] M. H. Freedman, A. Kitaev, and Z. Wang. Simulation of topological field theories by quantum computers. Comm. Math. <strong>Ph</strong>ys., 227, 587, 2002. [FSG + 08] A. Friedenauer, H. Schmitz, J. Glückert, D. Porras, and T. Schätz. Simulating a quantum magnet with trapped ions. Nature <strong>Ph</strong>ysics, 4, 757, 2008. [GC97] N. Gershenfeld and I. L. Chuang. Bulk spin-resonance quantum computation. Science, 275, 350, 1997. [GC99] D. Gottesman and I. L. Chuang. Demonstrating the viability of universal quantum computation using teleportation and single-qubit operations. Nature, 402, 390, 1999. [Gho95] P. K. Ghosh. Ion Traps. Oxford Science Publications, 1995. [GKK + 08] D. Gavinsky, J. Kempe, I. Kerenidis, R. Raz, and R. de Wolf. Exponential separation for one-way quantum communication complexity, with applications to cryptography. www.arxiv.org: quant-ph/0611209v3, 2008. [GL50] V. L. Ginzburg and L. D. Landau. Zh. Eksperim. i Teor. Fiz., 20, 1064, 1950. 220
[GME + 02] M. Greiner, O. Mandel, T. Esslinger, T. W. Hänsch, and I. Bloch. Quantum phase transition from a superfluid to a Mott insulator in a gas of ultracold atoms. Nature, 415, 39–44, 2002. [Got97] D. Gottesman. Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. A, 57, 127, 1997. [GP00] G. Grosso and G. P. Parravicini. Solid State <strong>Ph</strong>ysics. Academic Press, 2000. [GRL + 03] S. Gulde, M. Riebe, G. P. T. Lancaster, C. Becher, J. Eschner, H. Häffner, F. Schmidt-Kaler, I. L. Chuang, and R. Blatt. Implementation of the Deutsch-Josza algorithm on an ion-trap quantum computer. Nature, 421, 48–50, 2003. [Gro97] L. K. Grover. Quantum computers can search arbitrarily large databases by a single query. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. Lett., 79, 4709, 1997. [GS01] B. Georgeot and D. L. Shepelyansky. Exponential gain in quantum computing of quantum chaos and localization. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Rev. Lett., 86(13), 2890–2893, 2001. [HBW98] R. Cleve H. Buhrman and A. Wigderson. Quantum vs. classical communication and complexity. In Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, p. 63, ACM, New York, NY, 1998. [HDS + 08] G. Huber, T. Deuschle, W. Schnitzler, R. Reichle, K. Singer, and F. Schmidt- Kaler. Transport of ions in a segmented linear Paul trap in printed-circuitboard technology. New Journal of <strong>Ph</strong>ysics, 10, 013004, 2008. [HGH + 07] R. J. Hendricks, D. M. Grant, P. F. Herskind, A. Dantan, and M. Drewsen. An all-optical ion-loading technique for scalable microtrap architectures. Appl. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. B, 88, 507–513, 2007. [HHHR01] W. Hänsel, P. Hommelhoff, T. W. Hänsch, and J. Reichel. Bose-Einstein condensation on a microelectronic chip. Nature, 413, 498, 2001. [HHR + 05] H. Häffner, W Hänsel, C. F. Roos, J. Benhelm, D. Chek-al-kar, M. Chwalla, T. Körber, U. D. Rapol, M. Riebe, P. O.Schmidt, C. Becher, O. Gühne, W. Dür, and R. Blatt. Scalable multiparticle entanglement of trapped ions. Nature, 438, 643, 2005. [HMO + 06] Y. Hashimoto, L. Matsuoka, H. Osaki, Y. Fukushima, and S. Hasegawa. Trapping laser ablated 40 Ca + ions in linear Paul trap. Japanese Journal of Applied <strong>Ph</strong>ysics, 45, 7108, 2006. [HOS + 06] W. K. Hensinger, S. Olmschenk, D. Stick, D. Hucul, M. Yeo, M. Acton, L. Deslauriers, and C. Monroe. T-junction ion trap array for two-dimensional ion shuttling, storage, and manipulation. Appl. <strong>Ph</strong>ys. Lett., 88, 034101, 2006. [HSG + 07] A. A. Houck, D. I. Schuster, J. M. Gambetta, J. A. Schreier, B. R. Johnson, J. M. Chow, L. Frunzio, J. Majer, M. H. Devoret, S. M. Girvin, and R. J. Schoelkopf. Generating single microwave photons in a circuit. Nature, 449, 328–331, 2007. 221
- Page 1:
An Investigation of Precision and S
- Page 5 and 6:
Acknowledgments What a long, strang
- Page 7:
should totally start a band. I also
- Page 10 and 11:
2.4 Conclusions and further questio
- Page 12 and 13:
7.6.1 Regular array of stationary q
- Page 15 and 16:
List of Figures 2-1 The CNOT gate i
- Page 17:
7-12 Magnetic fields due to a “tr
- Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 Introduction The growth o
- Page 23 and 24:
1.1 Quantum information The concept
- Page 25 and 26:
us whether the target system obeys
- Page 27 and 28:
Nevertheless, there are a number of
- Page 29 and 30:
Digital Analog Classical Quantum Sp
- Page 31 and 32:
electrodes [TKK + 99]. This heating
- Page 33 and 34:
Digital Analog Classical Quantum Sp
- Page 35 and 36:
2. Initialization to a simple fiduc
- Page 37 and 38:
qubits, and in Ref. [SGA + 05] in t
- Page 39 and 40:
the lattice architecture, we discov
- Page 41 and 42:
1.6 Contributions to this work In t
- Page 43:
5) Ref. [DLC + 09b] Wiring up trapp
- Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 2 Quantum simulation using
- Page 49 and 50:
µN the nuclear magneton, and B0 th
- Page 51 and 52:
⎡ ⎤ a 0 0 0 ⎢ ⎥ ⎢ ρ2 =
- Page 53 and 54:
The same effect as number 2 above i
- Page 55 and 56:
where V0 is the maximum signal stre
- Page 57 and 58:
actions that occur between nuclei i
- Page 59 and 60:
Figure 2-2: The 2,3-dibromothiophen
- Page 61:
detail how this was done with a sim
- Page 64 and 65:
and thus requires invocation of the
- Page 66 and 67:
Renormalization Group (DMRG), with
- Page 68 and 69:
3.3 The bounds on precision In this
- Page 70 and 71:
Figure 3-1: A schematic of a generi
- Page 72 and 73:
Figure 3-3: The 11.7 T, 500 MHz sup
- Page 74 and 75:
. Figure 3-4: The above probe is a
- Page 76 and 77:
Figure 3-5: The CHFBr2 molecule. Al
- Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3-6: Frequency-domain spectr
- Page 80 and 81:
used to extract the answer is irrel
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 4 Theory and history of qua
- Page 85 and 86:
GND RF r ENDCAP 0 z 0 ENDCAP Ring T
- Page 87 and 88:
where Q is the charge of the trappe
- Page 89 and 90:
angular momentum along the quantiza
- Page 91 and 92:
emission from the excited state |
- Page 93 and 94:
selection rule ∆m = ±1 is applie
- Page 95 and 96:
Figure 4-3: Schematic diagram of sp
- Page 97 and 98:
to address an ion in state |↑〉
- Page 99 and 100:
the vibrational temperature is low.
- Page 101 and 102:
to the design of the trap itself. M
- Page 103 and 104:
to the quantum-mechanical ground st
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 5 Lattice ion traps for qua
- Page 107 and 108:
Figure 5-1: Schematic of the lattic
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 5-3: Fit to Eq. 5.2 of the C
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 5-4: The vacuum chamber for
- Page 113 and 114:
weeks. Low pressures depend on choo
- Page 115 and 116:
Figure 5-5: Left: Level diagram for
- Page 117 and 118:
Figure 5-7: (a) Schematic of the cr
- Page 119 and 120:
(a) Lattice Trap Schematic TOP PLAT
- Page 121 and 122:
mix the microspheres evenly in the
- Page 123 and 124:
Using the expression for ωˆr deri
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 5-15: Plot of the motional c
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 5-17: Dependence of the trap
- Page 129 and 130:
Chapter 6 Surface-electrode PCB ion
- Page 131 and 132:
Figure 6-1: Schematic of a linear i
- Page 133 and 134:
Figure 6-2: Layout of the trap elec
- Page 135 and 136:
Figure 6-3: Above are the cross sec
- Page 137 and 138:
Figure 6-6: Photograph of the trap
- Page 139 and 140:
Figure 6-8: CCD image of a cloud of
- Page 141 and 142:
Figure 6-9: Measurement results sho
- Page 143 and 144:
Figure 6-11: Bastille mounted in th
- Page 145 and 146:
Figure 6-13: A diagram of the setup
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 6-14: A plot of the trapped
- Page 149 and 150:
allows us to upper-bound the amount
- Page 151 and 152:
Chapter 7 Quantum simulation in sur
- Page 153 and 154:
Figure 7-1: Left: Uraniborg 1, as r
- Page 155 and 156:
Figure 7-3: Calculated secular freq
- Page 157 and 158:
Figure 7-5: Left: Structure of 2-D
- Page 159 and 160:
Figure 7-7: Scaling of the order of
- Page 161 and 162:
involved. Because ions near the cen
- Page 163 and 164:
Results Before presenting the numer
- Page 165 and 166:
Figure 7-10: Calculation results fo
- Page 167 and 168:
7.3 Magnetic gradient forces Now th
- Page 169 and 170: Figure 7-13: Scaling of the J-coupl
- Page 171 and 172: how are single-ion operations to be
- Page 173 and 174: 250 psi, which increases to around
- Page 175 and 176: Figure 7-18: At the center of this
- Page 177 and 178: Figure 7-19: The plastic socket tha
- Page 179 and 180: Figure 7-21: The two internal lense
- Page 181 and 182: Figure 7-22: Measured secular frequ
- Page 183 and 184: Along ˆy, the spacing is dˆy = 28
- Page 185 and 186: of O2 to 2 × 10 −12 torr. Decohe
- Page 187 and 188: Part III Toward ion-ion coupling ov
- Page 189 and 190: Chapter 8 Motivation for and theory
- Page 191 and 192: Figure 8-1: Schematic of the experi
- Page 193 and 194: are in close agreement in the case
- Page 195 and 196: 8.2.3 Simulated coupling rates We n
- Page 197 and 198: Johnson noise We begin our discussi
- Page 199 and 200: should suffice. Note that the above
- Page 201 and 202: Chapter 9 Measuring the interaction
- Page 203 and 204: Figure 9-2: Left: Level diagram for
- Page 205 and 206: Figure 9-5: Photograph of the micro
- Page 207 and 208: A fit of the resulting curve return
- Page 209 and 210: Figure 9-9: Linear fit of the ωˆy
- Page 211 and 212: Figure 9-12: Heating rate as determ
- Page 213 and 214: Chapter 10 Conclusions and outlook
- Page 215 and 216: traps, linking ions using photons,
- Page 217 and 218: Bibliography [ADM05] Paul M. Alsing
- Page 219: [CGB + 94] J. I. Cirac, L. J. Garay
- Page 223 and 224: [LCL + 07] D. R. Leibrandt, R. J. C
- Page 225 and 226: [PC04a] D. Porras and J. I. Cirac.
- Page 227 and 228: [TBZ05] L. Tian, R. Blatt, and P. Z
- Page 229 and 230: Appendix A Matlab code for Ising mo
- Page 231 and 232: err_result = mean(theerr) 231
- Page 233 and 234: J = J0; Jt(1) = J; Bt(1) = B; for k
- Page 235 and 236: A.3 Simulation with constant force
- Page 237 and 238: Appendix B Mathematica code for ion
- Page 239 and 240: 2 crystal_shape_6uraniborg.nb Out[6
- Page 241 and 242: Appendix C How to trap ions in a cl
- Page 243 and 244: Finally, we note that the chilled w
- Page 245 and 246: C.4 Laser alignment and imaging As