25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

are in close agreement in the case of small coupling constants (γ/ mω 2 ≪ 1). A more<br />

recent solution has shown that complete exchange of motional states can only occur on<br />

resonance (ω1 = ω2) and for specific initial motional states [PRDB08].<br />

The exchange rate, also known as the coupling rate ωex, is given by<br />

ωex<br />

2π<br />

γ<br />

= , (8.5)<br />

πωm<br />

where γ and α were defined above and ω = ω1 = ω2 (the resonant case). Incidentally, it is<br />

also equal to the classical expression!<br />

Referring to Eq. 8.3, the above formula for ωex allows us to evaluate the sensitivity of<br />

the coupling rate to the various parameters of our model system. For instance, the length<br />

of the wire and ion-wire distances enter as 1/ [L(H − h1)(H − h2)], a strong dependence,<br />

while the dependence on the wire radius a is only logarithmic (it is contained in α). Overall,<br />

we see that a shrinking of the entire system size leads to increased coupling, as the ions<br />

induce more charge when closer to the wire; also, a shorter wire length leads to a higher<br />

overall charge density on the wire. The inverse dependence on the secular frequency ω is an<br />

expected feature of coupled harmonic oscillators; we have seen similar physics at work in<br />

the lattice traps of Ch. 5. <strong>Ph</strong>ysically, tighter confinement (higher ω) reduces the effective<br />

“dipole moment” of each ion, which scales as 1/ √ ω.<br />

8.2.2 Circuit model solution<br />

The above model leads to a physical picture of the physics of our system. In this section, we<br />

explore a different approach, which is based on a circuit model of the system, in which each<br />

component is treated as a lumped element: an inductor, capacitor, or resistor. This can<br />

have two key advantages: one is that the above physical model is based on assumptions that<br />

are not strictly true, but are good approximations. To take an example, the capacitance<br />

between the wire and ground will differ from that computed for an infinite ground plane,<br />

especially since the length of the wire is not much less than the width of the trap in our<br />

experiment. A circuit model allows one to quickly plug in more reasonable estimates of<br />

this capacitance. The second, and more compelling, reason to use a circuit model is that it<br />

makes the treatment of decoherence simpler. This is because the main decoherence sources<br />

are electrical in nature; dissipation of currents in the wire and Johnson noise heating are<br />

the two prime examples. This approach was presented in Refs. [WD75] and [HW90], and<br />

we follow it here.<br />

We begin with the equations of motion for the ions:<br />

ec<br />

m Ei = ¨zi + ω 2 i zi, (8.6)<br />

where the electric field Ei is due to the voltage in the wire induced by the other ion. We<br />

wish to write this field in terms of quantities in the above model, and the result is<br />

193

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!