Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Along ˆy, the spacing is dˆy = 28±3 µm, while along ˆx it is dˆx = 17±3 µm. These values are<br />
consistent with the theoretical values of dˆy = 29.6 µm and dˆx = 17.1µm.<br />
Again, it was not possible to crystallize larger numbers of ions, and therefore confir-<br />
mation of the crystal structure for higher numbers of ions was not done. However, we do<br />
now have some confidence that the crystal structure in elliptical traps may be accurately<br />
computed. There are a number of possible reasons for the low ion number. Among them<br />
are the stability of the lasers used, the fact that crystals were only observed at relatively low<br />
trap depths (0.3 eV), and the possibility of heating from the rf electrode rendering larger<br />
crystals unstable. Indeed, the lifetime of a single ion in the absence of cooling light was at<br />
most a few seconds, indicating that heating may indeed be a problem.<br />
7.6 Discussion: connection to quantum simulation<br />
We have now presented the design and testing of a new method for preparing a 2-D Coulomb<br />
crystal in a Paul trap: the surface-electrode elliptical trap. The next step is to evaluate the<br />
usefulness of this trap for quantum simulation, focusing again on the challenging problem<br />
of spin frustration. We frame this discussion in terms of the requirements posed in Sec. 4.3.<br />
There, we note that a viable trap design must:<br />
1. Provide a regular array of stationary qubits in at least two spatial dimensions.<br />
2. Enable sufficient control over each qubit to implement the desired simulation.<br />
3. Possess, in principle, a low enough decoherence rate to perform meaningful simulations<br />
given certain coupling rates.<br />
We address these criteria one-by-one.<br />
7.6.1 Regular array of stationary qubits<br />
We have calculated crystal structures for the elliptical trap presented in this chapter, but<br />
it is seen from these that a truly regular array of ions is not produced. The reason for this<br />
is that the test trap was designed with more difference between the radial frequencies ωˆx<br />
and ωˆy than is strictly necessary to support a 2-D crystal with fixed ion positions.<br />
Recent calculations [BKGH08, BH09] have suggested that in a 2-D ion crystal regular<br />
lattice structures near the center of the lattice may be observed. We expect that, in our trap,<br />
as ωˆx → ωˆy, that such regular structures will also appear. The calculations of Sec. 7.1.2<br />
support this hypothesis.<br />
7.6.2 Sufficient controls<br />
We have outlined in this chapter two methods for implementing the state-dependent forces<br />
required for quantum simulation of spin models: optical forces and magnetic field gradients.<br />
183