Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Ph.D. Thesis - Physics
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7.3 Magnetic gradient forces<br />
Now that we have seen that in many cases quantum simulations may be performed in an<br />
elliptical trap (or other trap with nonzero micromotion), we are ready to discuss the actual<br />
source of the state-dependent forces F. Optical forces have been discussed at length in<br />
Ref. [PC04b], and in the thesis of Ziliang Lin [Lin08]. We focus in this section, rather, on<br />
fields of a magnetic origin. This has been treated in Ref. [CW08], but for the case of an array<br />
of microtraps, similar to the trap design studied in Ch. 5. The weakness of interactions<br />
between ions contained in different trapping regions motivates our work here on ions in the<br />
same trap. Two questions drive this work:<br />
1. What types of forces may be created using wires in the ground plane of the elliptical<br />
trap?<br />
2. How does the magnitude of this force and the magnitude of the J coupling rate scale<br />
with the trap size?<br />
A state-dependent force based on magnetic fields requires a field gradient in space, giving<br />
rise to a force F = −∇(m · B), where m is the magnetic moment of the atom. For the<br />
present work, we will consider the Zeeman-split sublevels of the ground S state in a 40 Ca +<br />
or 88 Sr + -like ion. The absolute value of the magnetic moment is then m = gJµBmJ, where<br />
µB is the Bohr magneton and mJ is the magnetic quantum number for the projection on the<br />
ˆz axis of the total angular momentum J. This choice is made to facilitate straightforward<br />
estimates for the types of ions discussed in this thesis, and indeed, coherence times of<br />
several seconds have been observed for such qubits encoded in decoherence-free subspaces<br />
[HSKH + 05]. However, hyperfine levels may prove to be a better choice because of their<br />
excellent coherence times even without such encoding.<br />
The state-dependent force thus depends on the alignment of the atom’s magnetic mo-<br />
ment in space, which follows the orientation of the local magnetic field. This force, for<br />
example along direction ˆy, is given by<br />
Fˆy = gJµB<br />
<br />
mˆx<br />
∂Bˆx<br />
∂y<br />
∂Bˆy<br />
+ mˆy + mˆz<br />
∂y<br />
7.3.1 Calculation of the gradients and interaction strengths<br />
<br />
∂Bˆz<br />
. (7.7)<br />
∂y<br />
The calculation of the fields and field gradients can be done by direct numerical integration<br />
of the applied surface currents. Methods used are similar to those employed by Wang et al.<br />
[WLG + 09] in their design of magnetic gradients for individual ion addressing. We assume<br />
that the wires are infinitesimally narrow; this becomes less accurate as the trap scale is<br />
decreased, and more sophisticated methods must be employed. Also, we limit the current<br />
through a given wire to 1 A, comparable to the maximal currents employed in neutral atom<br />
traps [HHHR01]. The fact that eventually, to reduce heating rates, these traps will need to<br />
167