25.07.2013 Views

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

Ph.D. Thesis - Physics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

7.3 Magnetic gradient forces<br />

Now that we have seen that in many cases quantum simulations may be performed in an<br />

elliptical trap (or other trap with nonzero micromotion), we are ready to discuss the actual<br />

source of the state-dependent forces F. Optical forces have been discussed at length in<br />

Ref. [PC04b], and in the thesis of Ziliang Lin [Lin08]. We focus in this section, rather, on<br />

fields of a magnetic origin. This has been treated in Ref. [CW08], but for the case of an array<br />

of microtraps, similar to the trap design studied in Ch. 5. The weakness of interactions<br />

between ions contained in different trapping regions motivates our work here on ions in the<br />

same trap. Two questions drive this work:<br />

1. What types of forces may be created using wires in the ground plane of the elliptical<br />

trap?<br />

2. How does the magnitude of this force and the magnitude of the J coupling rate scale<br />

with the trap size?<br />

A state-dependent force based on magnetic fields requires a field gradient in space, giving<br />

rise to a force F = −∇(m · B), where m is the magnetic moment of the atom. For the<br />

present work, we will consider the Zeeman-split sublevels of the ground S state in a 40 Ca +<br />

or 88 Sr + -like ion. The absolute value of the magnetic moment is then m = gJµBmJ, where<br />

µB is the Bohr magneton and mJ is the magnetic quantum number for the projection on the<br />

ˆz axis of the total angular momentum J. This choice is made to facilitate straightforward<br />

estimates for the types of ions discussed in this thesis, and indeed, coherence times of<br />

several seconds have been observed for such qubits encoded in decoherence-free subspaces<br />

[HSKH + 05]. However, hyperfine levels may prove to be a better choice because of their<br />

excellent coherence times even without such encoding.<br />

The state-dependent force thus depends on the alignment of the atom’s magnetic mo-<br />

ment in space, which follows the orientation of the local magnetic field. This force, for<br />

example along direction ˆy, is given by<br />

Fˆy = gJµB<br />

<br />

mˆx<br />

∂Bˆx<br />

∂y<br />

∂Bˆy<br />

+ mˆy + mˆz<br />

∂y<br />

7.3.1 Calculation of the gradients and interaction strengths<br />

<br />

∂Bˆz<br />

. (7.7)<br />

∂y<br />

The calculation of the fields and field gradients can be done by direct numerical integration<br />

of the applied surface currents. Methods used are similar to those employed by Wang et al.<br />

[WLG + 09] in their design of magnetic gradients for individual ion addressing. We assume<br />

that the wires are infinitesimally narrow; this becomes less accurate as the trap scale is<br />

decreased, and more sophisticated methods must be employed. Also, we limit the current<br />

through a given wire to 1 A, comparable to the maximal currents employed in neutral atom<br />

traps [HHHR01]. The fact that eventually, to reduce heating rates, these traps will need to<br />

167

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!